Implicit user-adaptive system engagement in speech and pen interfaces

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 969-978

  Oviatt, Sharon ^a   Swindells, Colin ^a   Arthur, Alex ^b  

^a Incaa Designs ^*  (United States)

^b Adapx Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational interface; Implicit; Pen pressure; Speech amplitude; System engagement; User adaptive

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL INTERFACE; IMPLICIT; PEN PRESSURE; SPEECH AMPLITUDE; SYSTEM ENGAGEMENT; USER-ADAPTIVE;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 57649244345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357204     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Arthur, A., Lunsford, R., Wesson, R. and Oviatt, S. Prototyping novel collaborative multimodal systems: Simulation, data collection and analysis tools for the next decade. Proc. of ICMI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 209-216.
2. Arthur, A., Swindells, C., Oviatt, S. and Cohen, P. A High-performance dual-wizard infrastructure supporting speech and digital pen input, in submission.
3. Hinckley, K., Guimbretiere, F., Baudisch, P., Sarin, R., Agrawala, M. and Cutrell. E. The springboard: Multiple modes in one spring-loaded control, Proc. of CHI, ACM Press (2006), 181-190.
4. Kao. H., Hong, M. and Wah, L. Handwriting pressure: Effects of task complexity, control mode and orthographic difference, Graphonomics: Contemporary Research in Handwriting, ed. by H. Kao, G. van Galen & R. Hoosain, North Holland, 1986, 47-66.
5. Li, Y., Hinckley, K., Guan, Z. and Landay, J. Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen-based user interfaces, Proc. of CHI, ACM Press (2005), 461-470.
6. Lindblom, B. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H theory, Speech Production and Speech Modeling, ed. by W. Hardcastle and A. Marchal, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990), 403-139.
7. Lunsford, R., Oviatt, S. & Coulston, R. Audio-visual cues distinguishing self- from system-directed speech in younger and older adults. Proc. of ICMI, ACM Press (2005), 265-272.
8. Lunsford, R., Oviatt, S. and Arthur, A. Toward openmicrophone engagement for multiparty interactions, Proc. of ICMI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 273-280.
9. Messer, D. The identification of names in maternal speech to infants. Journ. of Psycholinguistic Research, 10 (1), 1981, 69-77.
10. Neti, C., Iyengar, G., Potamianos, G., Senior, A., and Maison, B. Perceptual interfaces for information interaction: Joint processing of audio and visual information for human-computer interaction. Proc. of ICSLP, Chinese Friendship Publishers, (2000), 11-14.
11. Oviatt, S. L., Arthur, A. and Cohen, J. Q uiet interfaces that help students think, Proc. of VIST, ACM Press (2006), 191-200.
12. Oviatt, S., MacEachern, M. and Levow, G. Predicting hyperarticulate speech during human-computer error resolution, Speech Communication (1998), 24 (2), 1-23.
13. Paek, T., Horvitz, E., and Ringger, E. Continuous listening for unconstrained spoken dialog. Proc. of ICSLP, Chinese Friendship Publishers, (2000), 138-141.
14. Ramos, G., Boulos, M. and Balakrishnan, R. Pressure widgets, Proc. of CHI, (2004), 487-494.
15. Saund, E. and Lank, E. Stylus input and editing without prior selection of mode, Proc. of UIST, ACM Press (2003), 213-216.
16. Schroger, E., A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journ. of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 1996, 527-539.
17. Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A. and Baron, D. Observations on overlap: Findings and implications for automatic processing of multi-party conversation. Proc. of Eurospeech, (2001), 1359-1362.
18. van Turnhout, K., Terken, J., Bakx, I. and Eggen, B. Identifying the intended addressee in mixed humanhuman and human-computer interaction from non-verbal features. Proc. of ICMI, ACM Press (2005), 175-182.