The Springboard: Multiple modes in one Spring-loaded control

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 181-190

  Hinckley, Ken ^a   Guimbretiere, Francois ^b   Baudisch, Patrick ^a   Sarin, Raman ^a   Agrawala, Maneesh ^a   Cutrell, Edward ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Keystroke level model; Marking menus; Modes; Pen; Tablet

Indexed keywords

KEYSTROKE-LEVEL MODEL; MARKING MENUS; MODES; PEN; TABLET;

COMPUTER HARDWARE; CONTROL SYSTEMS; COSTS; ERROR ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745834419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Apitz, G., Guimbretiere, F. CrossY; A crossing based drawing application. UIST 2004, 3-12.
2. Appert, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. Context matters: Evaluating interaction techniques with the CIS model. Proc. of HCI 2004, Springer Verlag, 279-295.
3. Bier, E., Stone, M., Pier, K., Buxton, W., DeRose, T. Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The See-Through Interface, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 93, 73-80.
4. Card, S., Moran, T., Newell, A., The Keystroke-Level Model for User Performance Time with Interactive Systems. Communications of the ACM, 1980. 23(7): p. 396-410.
5. Dillon, R., Eday, J., Tombaugh, J., Measuring the True Cost of Command Selection: Techniques and Results.CHI'90, 19-25.
6. Fitzmaurice, G., Khan, A., Pieke, R., Buxton, B., Kurtenbach, G. Tracking Menus. UIST 2003, 71-79.
7. Grossman, T., Hinckley, K., Baudisch, P., Agrawala, M., Balakrishnan, R. Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices. CHI 2006.
8. Guimbretiere, F., Winograd, T. FlowMenu: Combining Command, Text, and Data Entry. UIST 2000, 213-216.
9. Hinckley, K., Baudisch, P., Ramos, G., Guimbretiere, F. Design and Analysis of Delimiters for Selection-Action Pen Gesture Phrases in Scriboli. CHI 2005, 451-460.
10. Johnson, J., Modes in non-computer devices. Int. J. Man-Mach. Studies, 1990. 32(4): 423-438.
11. Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W. The Limits of Expert Performance Using Hierarchic Marking Menus. INTERCHI'93, 482-487.
12. Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G., Owen, R., Baudel, T. The Hotbox: Efficient Access to a Large Number of Menu-items. CHI'99, 231-237.
13. Kurtenbach, G., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., An empirical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of 'marking menus'. J. Human Computer Interaction, 1993. 8(1).
14. Li, Y., Hinckley, K., Guan, Z., Landay, J. A. Experimental Analysis of Mode Switching Techniques in Pen-based User Interfaces. CHI 2005, 461-470.
15. Mackay, W. E. Which Interaction Technique Works When? Floating Palettes, Marking Menus and Toolglasses Support Different Task Strategies. ACM AVI 2002, 203-208.
16. McLoone, H., Hinckley, K., Cutrell, E. Ergonomic Principles Applied to the Design of the Microsoft Office Computer Keyboard. IEA 2003 International Ergonomics Association.
17. Norman, D. A., Categorization of Action Slips. Psychology Review, 1981. 88(1): p. 1-15.
18. Poller, M., Garter, S., The Effect of Modes on Text Editing by Experienced Editor Users. Human Factors, 26(4): 449-462.
19. Pook, S., Lecolinet, E., Vaysseix, G., Barillot, E. Control Menus: Execution and Control in a Single Interactor. CHI 2000 Extended Abstracts, 263-264.
20. Raskin, J., The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems. 2000: ACM Press.
21. Sellen, A., Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W., The Prevention of Mode Errors through Sensory Feedback. J. Human Computer Interaction, 1992, 7(2): p. 141-164.
22. Tesler, L., The Smalltalk environment. Byte 6(8): p. 90-147.
23. Wilson, F. R., The Hand: How its use shapes the brain, language, and human culture. 1998, New York: Pantheon.
24. Zhao, S., Balakrishnan, R. Simple vs. Compound Mark Hierarchical Marking Menus. UIST 2004, 33-42.