Wedge: Clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 787-796

  Gustafson, Sean ^a   Baudisch, Patrick ^b   Gutwin, Carl ^c   Irani, Pourang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Maps; Off screen; Peripneral awareness; Small screens; Spatial cognition; Visualization

Indexed keywords

CLUTTER (INFORMATION THEORY); DISPLAY DEVICES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LOCATION; MOBILE DEVICES; OPTICAL PROJECTORS; VISUALIZATION;

MAPS; OFF-SCREEN; PERIPNERAL AWARENESS; SMALL SCREENS; SPATIAL COGNITION;

FLUORESCENT SCREENS;

EID: 57649234056     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357179     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Baudisch, P. and Rosenholtz, R. (2003). Halo: A technique for visualizing off-screen locations. Proc. CHI 2003, 481-488.
2. Baudisch, P., Good, N., Bellotti, V., and Schraedley, P. (2002). Keeping things in context: A comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming. Proc. CHI 2002, 259-266.
3. Bederson, B. B., Hollan, J. D., Perlin, K., Meyer, J., Bacon, D., and Furnas, G. (1996). Pad++: A zoomable graphical sketchpad for exploring alternate interface physics, Visual Languages and Computation, 7, 3-31.
4. Burigat S., Chittaro L., and Gabrielli S. (2006). Visualizing locations of off-screen objects on mobile devices: A comparative evaluation of three approaches, Proc. MobileHCI 2006, 239-246.
5. Carpendale, M. S. T. and Montagnese, C. (2001). A framework for unifying presentation space. Proc. UIST 2001, 61-70.
6. Elder, J. and Zucker, S. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 33(7), 981-991.
7. Gustafson, S. and Irani, P. (2007). Comparing visualizations for tracking off-screen moving targets. Proc. CHI 2007, 2399-2404.
8. Guttman, S. E., and Kellman, P. J. (2002). Do spatial factors influence the microgenesis of illusory contours? Journal of Vision, 2, 355a.
9. Hornbeæk, K. and Frøkjaer, E. (2001). Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces. Proc. CHI 2001, 293-300.
10. Irani, P., Gutwin, C., and Yang, X. D. (2006). Improving selection of off-screen targets with hopping. Proc. CHI 2006, 299-308.
11. Lam, H. and Baudisch, P. (2005). Summary Thumbnails: Readable overviews for small screen web browsers. Proc. CHI 2005, 681-690.
12. Mackinlay, J. D., Good, L., Zellweger, P. T., Stefik, M., and Baudisch, P. (2003). City Lights: Contextual views in minimal space. Proc. CHI 2003, 838-839.
13. Marsh, T. and Wright, P. (2000) Using cinematography conventions to inform guidelines for the design and evaluation of virtual off-screen space. Proc. AAAI 2000 Spring Symp. Ser. Smart Graphics, 123-127.
14. Murray, R., Sekuler, A., and Bennett, P. (2001). Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin, 8, 713-720.
15. Nacenta, M., Subramanian, S., Sallam, S., Champoux, B., and Gutwin, C. (2006). Perspective Cursor: Perspective-based interaction for multi-display environments. Proc. CHI 2006, 289-298.
16. Nekrasovski, D., Bodnar, A., McGrenere, J., Guimbretiere, F., and Munzner, T. (2006). An evaluation of pan & zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview. Proc. CHI 2006, 11-20.
17. Rohs, M. and Essl, G. (2006). Which one is better? - Information navigation techniques for spatially aware handheld displays. Proc. ICMI 2006, 100-107.
18. Sarkar, M. and Brown, M. (1992). Graphical fisheye views of graphs. Proc. CHI 1992, 83-91.
19. Sekuler, A. and Murray, R. (2001). Amodal completion: A case studying grouping. In T. Shipley & P. Kellman (Eds.), From Fragments to Objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision, New York: Elsevier, 265-293.
20. Sekuler, A. and Palmer, S. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
21. Sekuler, A., Palmer, S., and Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260-267.
22. Shore, D. and Enns, T. (1997). Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 980-998.
23. Skopik, A. and Gutwin, C. (2005). Improving revisitation in fisheye views with visit wear. Proc. CHI 2005, 771-780.
24. Ware, C. and Lewis, M. (1995). The DragMag image magnifier. Proc. CHI 1995, 407-408.