An evaluation of pan&zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 11-20

  Nekrasovski, Dmitry ^a   Bodnar, Adam ^a   McGrenere, Joanna ^a   Guimbretière, François ^b   Munzner, Tamara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Guaranteed visibility; Information visualization; Navigation; Overview

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); RUBBER PRODUCTS; TREES (MATHEMATICS); USER INTERFACES;

GUARANTEED VISIBILITY; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; OVERVIEW;

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745867609     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1124772.1124775     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Baudisch, P. and Rosenholtz, R. (2003). Halo: A Technique for Visualizing Off-Screen Locations, Proc. ACM CHI 2003, 481-488.
2. Baudisch, P., Lee, B., and Hanna, L. (2004). Fishnet, a Fisheye Web Browser with Search Term Popouts: a Comparative Evaluation with Overview and Linear View. Proc. AVI 2004, 133-140.
3. Beard, D. B. and Walker, J. Q. (1990). Navigational Techniques to Improve the Display of Large Two-Dimensional Spaces. Behav. Info. Techn., 9(6), 451-466.
4. Bederson, B. B., damage, A., Czerwinski, M. P., & Robertson, G. G. (2004). DateLens: A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs. ACM ToCHI, 11(1), 90-119.
5. Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose, T. D. (1993). Toolglass and Magic Lenses: the See-Through Interface. Proc. SIGGRAPH '93, 73-80.
6. Card, S. K., Nation, D. (2002). Degree-of-Interest Trees: A Component of an Attention-Reactive User Interface. Proc. AVI 2002, 231-246.
7. Carrizo, S. F. (2004). Phylogenetic Trees: An Information Visualisation Perspective. Proc. Conference on Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics, 315-320.
8. Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-Squared and Partial Eta-Squared in Communication Science. Human Communication Research, 28, Oxford Journals, 473-490.
9. Carl Gutwin. (2002). Improving Focus Targeting in Interactive Fisheye Views. Proc. ACM CHI 2002, 267-274.
10. Gutwin, C., and Skopik, A. (2003). Fisheye Views are Good for Large Steering Tasks, Proc. ACM CHI 2003, 201-208.
11. Gutwin, C., and Fedak, C. (2004) A Comparison of Fisheye Lenses for Interactive Layout Tasks, Proc. Graphics Interface 2004, 213-220.
12. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
13. Hornbaek, K., and Frokjaer, E. (2001). Reading of Electronic Documents: The Usability of Linear, Fisheye, and Overview+Detail Interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI 2001, 293-300.
14. Hornbask, K., Bederson, B., & Plaisant, C. (2002). Navigation Patterns and Usability of Zoomable User Interfaces with and without an Overview. ACM ToCHI, 9 (4), 362-389.
15. Jul, S. and Furnas, G. W. (1998). Critical Zones in Desert Fog: Aids to Multiscale Navigation. Proc. ACM UIST 1998, 97-106.
16. Kobsa, A. (2004). User Experiments with Tree Visualization Systems. Proc. IEEE InfoVis 2004, 9-16.
17. Keahey, T. A. and Robertson, E. L. (1997). Nonlinear Magnification Fields. Proc. IEEE InfoVis 1997, 51-59.
18. Lamping, J., Rao, R., and Pirolli, P. (1995). A Focus+Context Technique Based on Hyperbolic Geometry for Visualizing Large Hierarchies. In Proc. ACM CHI 1995, 401-408.
19. Landauer, T. (1997). Chapter 9: Behavioral Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. In M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer, and P.V. Prabhu, (Eds), Handbook of human computer interaction (2nd ed.) (pp. 203-227). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
20. Leung, Y. and Apperley, M. (1994). A Review and Taxonomy of Distortion-Oriented Presentation Techniques. ACM ToCHI, 1(2), 126-160.
21. Munzner, T., Guimbretière, F., Tasiran, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, Y. (2003). TreeJuxtaposer: Scalable Tree Comparison using Focus+Context with Guaranteed Visibility. Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, 453-462.
22. Olduvai Project Website, http://olduvai.sourceforge.net/. Retrieved February 1, 2006.
23. Pirolli, P., Card, S. K., and Van Der Wege, M. M. (2001). Visual Information Foraging in a Focus + Context Visualization. In Proc. ACM CHI 2001, 506-513.
24. Plaisant, C., Carr, D., and Shneiderman, B. (1995). Image Browsers: Taxonomy, Guidelines, and Informal Specifications. IEEE Software 12(2), 21-32.
25. Plaisant, C., Grosjean, J., and Bederson, B. (2002). SpaceTree: Supporting Exploration in Large Node Link Tree, Design Evolution and Empirical Evaluation. Proc. IEEE InfoVis 2002, 57-64.
26. Robertson, G., Mackinlay, J. (1993). The Document Lens. Proc. ACM UIST 1993, 101-108.
27. Sarkar, M., Snibbe, S., Tversky, O., and Reiss, S. (1993). Stretching the Rubber Sheet: A Metaphor for Viewing Large Layouts on Small Screens. Proc. ACM UIST 1993, 81-91.
28. Schafer, W. and Bowman, D. (2003). A Comparison of Traditional and Fisheye Radar View Techniques for Spatial Collaboration. Proc. Graphics Interface 2003, 39-46.
29. Schaffer, D., Zuo, Z., Greenberg, S., Bartram, L., Dill, J., Dubs, S., and Roseman, M., Navigating Clustered Networks through Fisheye and Full-Zoom Methods, ACM ToCHI, 3(2), 1996, 162-188.
30. Slack, J., Hildebrand, K., and Munzner, T. (2005) PRISAD: Partitioned Rendering Infrastructure for Scalable Accordion Drawing, Proc IEEE InfoVis 2005, 41-49.
31. Wehrend, S. and Lewis, C. (1990). A Problem-Oriented Classification of Visualization Techniques. Proc. IEEE Visualization 1990, 139-143.
32. Zellweger, P. T., Mackinlay, J. D., Good, L., Stefik, M., and Baudisch, P. (2003). City Lights: Contextual Views in Minimal Space. Proc. ACM CHI 2003, 838-839.