Region-Based Representations for Face Recognition

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 354-375

  Balas, Benjamin J ^a   Sinha, Pawan ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Face recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 57649211067     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1190036.1190038     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anzai, A. Bearse, M. A., Freeman, R. D., and Cai, D. 1995. Contrast coding by cells in the cat's striate cortex: Monocular vs. binocular detection. Visual Neuroscience, 12, 77-93.
2. Attneave, F. 1954. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61, 183-193.
3. Balas, B. and Sinha, P. (in press). Receptive field structures for recognition. Neural Computation.
4. Bartlett, M. Stewart, Lades, H. Martin, and Sejnowski, T. J. 1998. Independent component representations for face recognition. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol 3299: Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III. 528-539.
5. Belhumer, P. N., Hespanha, J. P., and Kriegman, D. J. 1997. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 19, 711-720.
6. Bell, A. J., and Sejnowski, T. J. 1997. The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research 37, 23, 3327-3338.
7. Beveridge, J. R., She, K., Draper, B., and Givens, G. H. 2001. A nonparametric statistical comparison of principal component and linear discriminant subspaces for face recognition. In Proc. IEEE Conf. CVPR 3, 535-542.
8. Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 115-147.
9. Biederman, I., and Ju, G. 1988. Surface vs. edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology 20, 38-64.
10. Bolme, D., Beveridge, R., Teixeira, M., and Draper, B. 2003. The CSU face identification evaluation system: Its purpose, features and structure. International Conference on Vision Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York. 304-311.
11. Burbeck, C. A., and Pizer, S. M. 1995. Object representation by cores: Identifying and representing primitive spatial regions. Vision Research 35, 13, 1917-1930.
12. Chauvin, A., Worsley, K. J. Schyns, P. G. Arguin, M., and Gosselin, F. 2005. Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. J. Vis. 5, 9, 659-667.
13. Chen, H. F., Belhumeur, P. N., and Jacobs, D. W. 2000. In search of illumination invariants Proc. IEEE Conf. CVPR, 2, 254-261.
14. Danilova, M. V., and Mollon, J. D. 2003. Comparison at a distance. Perception 32, 4, 395-414.
15. Deangelis, G. C., Ohzawa, I., and Freeman, R. D. 1993. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. J. Neurophysiology 69, 1091-1117.
16. Daugman, J. G. 1985. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by twodimensional visual cortical filters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 7, 1160-1169.
17. Davies, G., Ellis, H., and Shepherd, J. 1978. Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology 63, 180-187.
18. Field, D. J. 1994. What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation 6, 559-601.
19. Gosselin, F and Schyns, P. G. 2001. Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research 41, 17, 2261-2271.
20. Kersten, D. 1987. Predicability and redundancy of natural images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 2395-2400.
21. Kohly, R. P. and Regan, D. 2000. Coincidence detectors: Visual processing of a pair of lines and implications for shape discrimination. Vision Research 40, 17, 2291-2306.
22. Lades, M., Vorbruggen, J. C. Buhmann, J. Lange, J. V. D. Malsburg, C. Wurtz, R. P., and Konen, W. 1993. Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers 42, 3, 300-310.
23. Leder, H. 1996. Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing. Perception 25, 355-366.
24. Leder, H. 1999. Matching person identity from facial line drawings. Perception 28, 1171-1175.
25. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., and Brent, H. 2003. Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience 6, 1108-1112.
26. Malik, J., Belongie, S., Shi, J., and Leung, T. K. 1999. Textons, contours and regions: Cue integration in image segmentation, ICCV. 918-925
27. Moghaddam, B., Jebara, T., and Pentland, A. 2000. Bayesian face recognition. Pattern Recognition 333, 11, 1771-1782.
28. Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., and Shimojo, S. 1995. Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Visual Cognition S. M. Kosslyn and D. N. Oshershon, Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Olshausen, B. A. 1996. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, London 381, 607-609.
30. Olshausen, B. A., and Field, D. J. 1997. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? Vision Research 37, 23, 3311-3325.
31. Peli, E. 1990. Contrast in complex images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 10, 2032-2040.
32. Phillips, P. J., Moon, H., Rizvi, S. A., and Rauss, P J. 2000. The FERET Evaluation Methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2, 10, 1090-1103.
33. Sadr, J., Mukherjee, S., Thoresz, K., and Sinha, P. 2002. The fidelity of local ordinal encoding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. T. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani, Eds., MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
34. Samaria, F. and Harter, A. 1994. Parametrisation of a stochastic model for human face identification. Paper presented at the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, Sarasota, FL.
35. Sinha, P. 2002a. Identifying perceptually significant features for recognizing faces. Proc. SPIE Electronic Imaging Symp. 4662. 12-21.
36. Sinha, P. 2002b. Qualitative representations for recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2525. Springer-Verlag, New York, 249-262.
37. Schwaninger, A., Lobmaier, J., and Collishaw, S. M. 2002. Component and configural information in face recognition. Lecture Notes Computer Science, Vol. LNCS2525. 643-650. Springer-Verlag, New York.
38. Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., and Gosselin, F. 2002. Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science 13, 402-409.
39. Turk, M. A. and Pentland, A. P. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 1, 71-86.
40. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., and Sali, E. 2002. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience 5, 7, 682-687.
41. Viola, P. and Jones, M. 2001. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. Paper presented at the Accepted Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
42. Wiskott, L., Fellous, J. M., Kruger, N., and Von Der Malsburg, C. 1997. Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19, 7, 775-779.
43. Yip, A., and Sinha, P. 2002. Role of color in face recognition. Perception 31, 995-1003.
44. Young, R. A., Lesperance, R. M., and Meyer, W. W. 2001. The Gaussian derivative model for spatial-temporal vision: I. Cortical model. Spatial Vision 14, 261-319.
45. Young, R. A. and Lesperance, R. M. 2001. The Gaussian derivative model for spatial-temporal vision: II. Cortical data. Spatial Vision 14, 321-389.