Fracture and damage mechanics modelling of thin-walled structures - An overview

Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 5-43

  Zerbst, Uwe ^a   Heinimann, Markus ^b   Donne, Claudio Dalle ^c   Steglich, Dirk ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b ALCOA TECHNICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c AIRBUS GROUP INNOVATIONS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Damage mechanics; Fracture mechanics; Residual strength; Stable crack extension; Thin walled structures

Indexed keywords

BEAMS AND GIRDERS; BRITTLENESS; CRACK TIPS; FRACTURE; FRACTURE MECHANICS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRESSES; TENSILE STRENGTH; THIN WALLED STRUCTURES;

BONDED STRUCTURES; COHESIVE ZONE MODELS; CRACK DEVIATIONS; CRACK DRIVING FORCES; CRACK TIP OPENINGS; CRITICAL SEPARATIONS; DAMAGE MECHANICS; DAMAGE MODELS; LINEAR ELASTIC STRESSES; MATERIAL COMPOUNDS; PLASTIC ZONES; RESIDUAL STRENGTH; SEPARATION ENERGIES; SITE DAMAGES; STABLE CRACK EXTENSION; STIFFENED PANELS; STRENGTH MISMATCHES; WELDING RESIDUAL STRESSES;

MECHANICS;

EID: 57649193744     PISSN: 00137944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (161)

1. Zerbst U., Schödel M., Webster S., and Ainsworth R.A. Fitness-for-service fracture assessment of structures containing cracks. A workbook based on the European SINTAP/FITNET procedure (2007), Elsevier
2. Weitzman R.H., and Finnie I. Measuring fracture toughness - a simplified approach using controlled crack propagation. J Mater 7 (1972) 294-299
3. ASTM E 399-90. Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. ASTM International; re-approved 1997.
4. NASGRO 3.0. Fatigue crack growth computer program "NASGRO" Version 3.0. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Centre, Houston, Texas; 2000.
5. USAF handbook for damage tolerant design, last update 2002 [chapter 4.5: Residual strength. Built-up structures].
6. Poe Jr. CC. Stress-intensity factor for a cracked sheet with riveted and uniformly spaced stringers. NASA Technical Report TR R-358; 1971.
7. Rooke D.P., and Cartwright D.J. Compendium of stress intensity factors (1974), HMSO, London [chapter 2: Stiffened Sheets]
8. Schmidt H-J. Damage tolerance technology for current and future aircraft structure. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Hamburg, Germany, Plantema Memorial Lecture, vol. 1; 1995. p. 1-41.
9. Toor P.M. On damage tolerance design of fuselage structure (longitudinal cracks). Engng Fract Mech 24 (1986) 915-927
10. Toor P.M. On damage tolerance design of fuselage structure - circumferential cracks. Engng Fract Mech 26 (1987) 771-782
11. Newman Jr. JC. Advances in fatigue and fracture mechanics analyses for aircraft structures. In: Proceedings of the 20th ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Bellevue, Washington, Plantema Memorial Lecture; 1999. p. 3-42.
12. Ingraffea A.R., and Wawrzynek P.A. Finite element method for linear elastic fracture mechanics. In: de Borst R., and Mang H.A. (Eds). Comprehensive structural integrity. Numerical and computational methods vol. 3 (2003), Elsevier, Amsterdam 1-88
13. Aliabadi M.H. Boundary element methods in linear elastic fracture mechanics. In: de Borst R., and Mang H.A. (Eds). Comprehensive structural integrity. Numerical and computational methods vol. 3 (2003), Elsevier, Amsterdam 125-891
14. Atkins AG. Thin sheet fracture. In: Milne I, Ricthie RO, Karihaloo B, editors. Comprehensive structural integrity, Structural integrity assessment, vol. 1; 2003. p. 355-76 [chapter 1.17].
15. c) of aluminium alloy 7475-1/2 inch plate, tempers-T7651 and T7351 and of aluminium alloy 2024-1/8 inch sheet-T81 and T62 temper. General Dynamics, Fort Worth Div., F-16 Air Combat Fighter Technical Reports TIS GA2300, CDRL A031, USAF Contract F33657-75-C-0310; 1975.
16. Krafft JM, Sullivan AM, Boyle RW. Effect of dimensions on fast fracture instability of notched sheets. In: Kennedy AJ, editor. Proceedings of the symposium on crack propagation, Cranfield, UK; 1961. p. 8-28.
17. McCabe DE. Fracture toughness evaluation by the R-curve method. ASTM STP 527; 1973.
18. ASTM E 561-98. Standard practice for R-curve determination. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1998.
19. Anderson T.L. Fracture mechanics (1991), CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL
20. Schwalbe K-H, Heerens J, Zerbst U, Pisarski H, Koçak M. EFAM-GTP 02. The GKSS procedure for determining the fracture behaviour of materials. GKSS-Research Centre Geesthacht. GKSS Report 2002/24; 2002.
21. ESIS P3-04D. Draft unified procedure for determining the fracture behaviour of material. European Structural Integrity Society (ESIS); 2007.
22. Schwalbe K.-H., Newman Jr. J.C., and Shannon Jr. J.L. Fracture mechanics testing on specimens with low constraint-standardization activities within ISO and ASTM. Engng Fract Mech 72 (2005) 557-576
23. Concalves W, Pramono A, Chaves CE. Embraer new family of jets - meeting the current fatigue and damage tolerance requirements. In: Proceedings of the 22th ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Sheffield, UK; 2004. p. 231-57.
24. Boscolo M, Allergi G, Zhang X. Design and modeling of selective reinforcements for integral aircraft structures. AIAA Paper 2007-1034 2116. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference; 2007.
25. ASTM E 1820-01. Standard test method for fracture toughness. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2001.
26. ISO 12135. Metallic materials - unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness. International Standard Organisation (ISO); 2003.
27. 5 as an operational definition of the CTOD and its practical use. ASTM STP 1256. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1995. p. 763-78.
28. Schwalbe K.-H., and Heerens J. R-curve testing and its relevance to structural assessment. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 21 (1998) 1259-1271
29. Andersson H. Finite element representation of stable crack growth. J Mech Phys Solids 21 (1973) 337-356
30. de Koning AU. A contribution to the analysis of quasi static crack growth in steel materials. In: Fracture 1977, Proceedings of the fourth international conference fracture (ICF4), vol. 3; 1977. p. 25-31.
31. Demofonti G., and Rizzi L. Experimental evaluation of CTOA in controlling unstable ductile fracture propagation. In: Blauel J.G., and Schwalbe K.-H. (Eds). Defect assessment in components - fundamentals and applications, SEIS/EGF 9 (1991), Mech. Engng. Publ., London 693-703
32. Newman Jr. JC, Dawicke DS, Bigelow CA. Finite element analysis and measurement of CTOA ductile stable tearing in a thin sheet aluminium alloy. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on structural integrity of aging airplanes. Atlanta, Georgia; 1992. p. 167-86.
33. Kanninen M.F., Popelar C.H., and Broek D. A critical survey on the application of plastic fracture mechanics to nuclear pressure vessels and piping. Nucl Engng Des 67 (1981) 27-55
34. Newman Jr. JC, Zerbst U, editors. Special issue on fundamentals and applications of the crack tip opening angle (CTOA). Engng Fract Mech 2003;70(3-4):367-577.
35. James M, Bucci B. Resistance curve predictions using the constant CTOA toughness fracture criterion. Engng Fract Mech, this issue.
36. Pirondi A., and Fersini D. Simulation of ductile crack growth in thin panels using CTOA. Engng. Fract Mech 76 1 (2009) 88-100
37. 5 measurement technique. Engng Fract Mech, this issue.
38. Newman J.C., James M.A., and Zerbst U. A review of the CTOA/CTOD fracture criterion. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 371-385
39. Dawicke D.S., and Sutton M.A. CTOA and crack tip tunneling measurements in aluminium alloy 2024-T3. Exp Mech 34 (1994) 357-368
40. 5 measuring technique. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 417-426
41. Sutton M.A., Turner J.L., Bruck H.A., and Chae T.A. Full-field representation of discretely sampled surface deformation for displacement and strain analysis. Exp Mech 31 (1991) 168-177
42. Dawicke DS, Newman Jr. JC, Bigelow CA. Three-dimensional CTOA and constraint effects during stable tearing in a thin-sheet material. ASTM STP 1256; 1995. p. 223-42.
43. Ma L., Lam P.W., Kokaly M.T., and Kobayashi A.S. CTOA of a stable crack in a thin aluminium fracture specimen. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 427-442
44. Shterenlikht A., Hashemi S.H., Howard I.C., Yates J.R., and Andrews R.M. A specimen for studying the resistance to ductile crack propagation in pipes. Engng Fract Mech 71 (2004) 1997-2013
45. Lloyd W.R. Microtopography for ductile fracture process characterization. Part 1: Theory and methodology. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 387-401
46. Lloyd W.R., and McClintock F.A. Microtopography for ductile fracture process characterization. Part 2: Application for CTOA analysis. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 403-415
47. Shivakumar KN, Newman Jr. JC. ZIP3D - an elastic-plastic finite-element analysis program for cracked bodies. NASA TM 102753; 1990.
48. Hampton R.W., and Nelson D. Stable crack growth and instability prediction in thin plates and cylinders. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 469-491
49. Mahmoud S., and Lease K. Two-dimensional and three dimensional finite element analyses of critical crack-tip-opening angle in 2024-T351 aluminium alloy at four thicknesses. Engng Fract Mech 71 (2004) 1379-1391
50. Newman Jr. J.C., Dawicke D.S., and Seshadri B.R. Residual strength analyses of stiffened and un-stiffened panels - Part I: Laboratory specimens. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 493-507
51. Demofonti G, Buzzichelli G, Venzi S, Kanninen M. Step by step procedure for the two specimen CTOA test. In: Denys R, editor. Third International pipeline conference, Brugge, Belgium, vol. II; 1995. p. 503-12.
52. Salvini P., Fonzo A., and Mannucci G. Identification of CTOA and fracture process parameters by drop weight test and finite element simulation. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 553-566
53. Rudland D.L., Wilkowski G.M., Feng Z., Wang Y.-Y., Horsley D., and Glover G. Experimental investigation of CTOA in linepipe steels. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 567-577
54. Mahmoud S., and Lease K. The effect of specimen thickness on the experimental characterization of critical crack-tip-opening angle in 2024-T351 aluminium alloy. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 443-456
55. Dawicke DS, Newman Jr. JC, Starnes Jr. JH, Rose CA, Youn RD, Seshardy BR. Residual strength analysis methodology: laboratory coupons to structural components. In: Third Joint FAA/DoD/NASA conference on aging aircraft. Albuquerque, MN; 1999.
56. Newman Jr. JC, Crews Jr. JH, Bigelow CA, Dawicke DS. Variations of the global constraint factor in cracked bodies under tension and bending loads. ASTM STP 1244; 1995. p. 21-42.
57. Brocks W., Eberle A., Fricke S., and Veith H. Large stable crack growth in fracture mechanics specimens. Nucl Engng Des 151 (1994) 387-400
58. 5-resistance curves for 2024-T351 aluminium alloy. ASTM STP 1406; 2002. p. 279-97.
59. James M.A., and Newman Jr. J.C. The effect of crack tunneling on crack growth: experiments and CTOA analyses. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 457-468
60. Schödel M., and Zerbst U. Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to thin wall structures. Analytical assessment levels. Engng Fract Mech 71 (2004) 1035-1058
61. Dugdale D.S. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8 (1960) 100-108
62. Barenblatt G.I. The mathematical theory of equilibrium of cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7 (1962) 55-129
63. Needleman A. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech 54 (1987) 525-531
64. Elices G.V., Guinea J., Gomez J., and Planas J. The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. Engng Fract Mech 69 (2002) 137-163
65. Brocks W., Cornec A., and Scheider I. Computational aspects of nonlinear fracture mechanics. In: de Borst R., and Mang H.A. (Eds). Comprehensive structural integrity. Numerical and computational methods vol. 3 (2003), Elsevier Ltd. 127-209
66. Brocks W, Cornec A, editors. Special issue on cohesive models. Engng Fract Mech 2003;70(14):1741-987.
67. Xu X., and Needleman A. Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42 (1994) 1397-1434
68. Scheider I., and Brocks W. Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive zone model. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1943-1961
69. Cornec A., Scheider I., and Schwalbe K.-H. On the practical application of the cohesive model. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 1963-1987
70. Scheider I. Residual strength prediction of a complex structure using crack extension analyses. Engng Fract Mech 76 1 (2009) 149-163
71. Nègre P., Steglich D., and Brocks W. Crack extension at an interface: prediction of fracture toughness and simulation of crack path deviation. Int J Fract 134 (2005) 209-229
72. Chen C.R., Kolednik O., Heeeens J., and Fischer F.D. Three-dimensional modeling of ductile crack growth: cohesive zone parameters and crack tip triaxiality. Engng Fract Mech 72 (2005) 2094-2972
73. Roy Y.D.A., and Dodds R.H. Simulation of ductile crack growth in thin aluminium panel using 3-D surface cohesive elements. Int J Fract 110 (2001) 21-45
74. Roychowdhury S., Roy Y.D.A., and Dodds Jr. R.H. Ductile tearing in thin aluminium panels: experiments and analyses using large-displacement, 3-D surface cohesive elements. Engng Fract Mech 69 (2002) 983-1002
75. Lin G., Cornec A., and Schwalbe K.-H. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of crack extension in aluminium alloy 2024-FC. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 21 (1998) 1159-1173
76. Yuan H., Lin G., and Cornec A. Verification of a cohesive zone model for ductile fracture. J Engng Mater Technol 118 (1996) 192-200
77. Li W., and Siegmund T. An analysis of crack growth in thin-sheet metal via a cohesive zone model. Engng Fract Mech 69 (2002) 2073-2093
78. Scheider I., and Brocks W. Cohesive elements fort thin-walled structures. Comput Mater Sci 37 (2006) 101-109
79. Siegmund T, Brocks W. The role of cohesive strength and separation energy for modeling of ductile fracture. ASTM STP 1360; 2000. p. 139-51.
80. Cornec A, Schönfeld W, Brocks W, Assler H. Restfestigkeit von flugzeugrumpfschalen: finite element analyse und experiment. In: 37th symposium of "K Bruchvorgänge", Germany; 2005. p. 65-74.
81. Kachanov L.M. On the time to failure under creep conditions. Izv Akad Nauk SSR 8 (1958) 26-31
82. Beremin F.M. Cavity formation from inclusions in ductile fracture of A508 steel. Metall Trans 12A (1981) 723-731
83. Beremin F.M. A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metall Trans 14A (1983) 2277-2287
84. Lemaitre J. Local approach of fracture. Engng Fract Mech 25 (1986) 523-527
85. Lemaitre J. Continuum damage mechanics: theory and applications. Technical Report 295, CISM, Udine; 1987.
86. Rousselier G. Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture. Nucl Eng Des 105 (1987) 97-111
87. Eshelby D. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 241 (1957) 376-396
88. Hill R. A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials. J Mech Phys Solids 13 (1965) 213-222
89. Hutchinson J.W. Bounds and self-consistent estimates for creep of polycrystalline materials. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 348 (1976) 101-127
90. Rice J.R., and Tracey D.M. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17 (1969) 201-217
91. Gurson A.L. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I - Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Engng Mater Technol 99 (1977) 2-15
92. Needleman A., and Tvergaard V. An analysis of ductile rupture in notched bars. J Mech Phys Solids 32 (1984) 461-490
93. Needleman A., and Tvergaard V. An analysis of ductile rupture modes at a crack tip. J Mech Phys Solids 35 (1987) 151-183
94. Brocks W, Klingbeil D, Künecke G, Sun D-Z. Application of the Gurson model to ductile tearing resistance. In: Second symposium on constraint effects. ASTM STP 1224. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1995a. p. 232-52.
95. Xia L., and Shih F.C. Ductile crack growth - I: a numerical study using computational cells with microstructurally-based length scales. J Mech Phys Solids 43 (1995) 223-259
96. Ruggieri C., Panontin T.L., and Dodds R.H. Numerical modeling of ductile crack growth in 3-D using computational cell elements. Int J Fract 82 (1996) 67-95
97. Sun DZ, Hönig A, Böhme W, Schmitt W. Application of micromechanical models to the analysis of ductile fracture under dynamic loading. ASTM STP 1220. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1994. p. 343-57.
98. Nègre P., Steglich D., and Brocks W. Crack extension in aluminium welds: a numerical approach using the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model. Engng Fract Mech 71 (2004) 2365-2383
99. Wyart E., Coulon D., Pardoen T., Remacle J.F., and Lani F. Application of the substructured finite element/eXtended finite element (S-FE/XFE) method to the analysis of cracks in aircraft thin walled structures. Engng Fract Mech 76 1 (2009) 44-58
100. Sumpter J. An experimental investigation of the T stress approach, constraint effects in fracture. ASTM STP 1171. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1993. p. 492-502.
101. Pineau A. Global and local approaches to fracture - transferability of laboratory test results to components. In: Argon A.S. (Ed). Topics in fracture and fatigue (1992), Springer Verlag Inc., NY 197-234
102. Besson J., Brocks W., Chabanet O., and Steglich D. Ductile rupture of aluminum sheet materials. Eur J Finite Elem 10 (2001) 401-415
103. Chabanet O., Steglich D., Besson J., Heitmann V., Hellmann D., and Brocks W. Predicting crack growth resistance of aluminium sheets. Comput Mater Sci 26 (2003) 1-12
104. USAF handbook for damage tolerant design, last update 2002 [chapter 4: Residual strength].
105. Nesterenko BG. Analysis of stiffened structure residual strength using R-curve of skin material. In: Proceedings of the 22th ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Sheffield, UK; 2004. p. 749-61.
106. R6, Revision 4. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. Barnwood, Gloucester: British Energy Generation Ltd. (BEGL); 2000.
107. BS 7910 guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. London: British Standard Institution (BSI); 2005.
108. Kocak M, Webster S, Janosch JJ, Ainsworth RA, Koers R. Fitness for service procedure (FITNET), Final Draft 7; 2006.
109. Schödel M., Zerbst U., and Dalle Donne C. Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to thin wall structures subjected to biaxial and mixed mode loadings. Engng Fract Mech 73 (2006) 626-642
110. Zerbst U, Schödel M, Ata-Ur R. 2005, unpublished results.
111. Brocks W., Schwalbe K.-H., and Zerbst U. Structural integrity assessment of thin-walled structures. Adv Engng Mater 8 (2006) 319-327
112. Schödel M, Scheider I, Iberer T, Rother K. Residual strength of thin-walled structures based on the CTOA approach of ANSYS. In: 23rd CAD-FEM users meeting; 2005.
113. Brocks W., Scheider I., and Schödel M. Simulation of crack extension in shell structures and prediction of residual strength. Arch Appl Mech 76 (2006) 655-665
114. Baumeister WJ, Kalal DR. The design and certification of a monolithic spar in a light business jet. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Hamburg, Germany, vol. I; 2005. p. 177-88.
115. Seshadri B.R., Newman Jr. J.C., and Dawicke D.S. Residual strength analyses of stiffened and un-stiffened panels - Part II: Wide panels. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 493-507
116. Baewell CA, Eber L, Fyfe IM. A study of failure in small pressurized cylindrical shells containing a crack. NASA Report NASA/CR-1998-208454; 1998.
117. Chen C-S, Wawrzynek PA, Ingraffea AR. Crack growth simulation and residual strength prediction in airplane fuselages. NASA Report NASA/CR-1999-209115; 1999.
118. Scheider I., Schödel M., Brocks W., and Schönfeld W. Crack propagation analyses with CTOA and cohesive model: comparison and experimental validation. Engng Fract Mech 73 (2006) 252-263
119. Brocks W. Cohesive strength and separation energy as characteristic parameters of fracture toughness and their relation to micromechanics. Struct Integr Durab 1 (2005) 233-244
120. Windisch M., Sun D.-Z., Memhard D., and Siegele D. Defect tolerance assessment of ARIANE 5 structure on the basis of damage mechanics material modeling. Engng Fract Mech 76 1 (2009) 59-73
121. Collins RA, Kimmins ST, Campassens D, Rodrigo P. Advanced material and manufacturing techniques on future airbus aircraft, and the implications for fatigue and damage tolerance. In: Proceedings of the 22th ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Sheffield, UK; 2004. p. 231-57.
122. Schijve J. Multiple-site damage in aircraft fuselage structures. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 18 (1995) 329-344
123. Liao M., Shi G., and Xiong Y. Analytical methodology for predicting fatigue life distribution of fuselage splices. Int J Fatigue 23 (2001) S177-S185
124. Moussa W.A. Risk-based reliability evaluation of multi-site damage in pipelines. Comput Ind Engng 35 (1998) 595-598
125. Pitt S., and Jones R. Compliance measurements for assessing structural integrity. Engng Failure Anal 8 (2001) 371-397
126. Harris C.E., Newman Jr. J.C., Piascik R.S., and Starnes J.H. Analytical methodology for predicting widespread fatigue damage onset in fuselage structures. J Aircraft 35 (1998) 307-317
127. Swift T. The effects of stress level, geometry and material on fatigue damage tolerance of pressurized fuselage structure. In: Proceedings of the 14th ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Ottawa, Canada; 1987. p. 1-77.
128. Broek D, Jeong DY, Thomson D. Testing and analysis of flat and curved panels with multiple cracks. In: Proceedings of the FAA/NASA international symposium advanced structural integrity methods for airframe durability and damage tolerance, vol. 3274. Hampton, VA: NASA Conf. Publ.; 1994. p. 85-98.
129. De Wit R, Fields RJ, Low SR, Harne DE, Foecke T. Fracture testing of large scale thin-sheet aluminium alloy. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, NISTIR Rep. 5661; 1995.
130. Nilsson KF. Elastic-plastic models for interaction between major crack and multiple small cracks. In: Proceedings of the FAA/NASA internatinal symposium on continued airworthiness of aircraft structures, Atlanta, GA; 1996. p. 197-225.
131. Smith B.L., Saville P.A., Mouak A., and Myose R.Y. Strength of 2024-T3 aluminium panels with multiple site damage. J Aircraft 37 (2000) 325-331
132. De Wit R., Fields R.J., Mordfin L., Low S.R., and Harne D. Fracture behavior of large-scale thin-sheet aluminium alloy. Proceedings of the FAA/NASA international symposium advanced structural integrity methods for airframe durability and damage tolerance vol. 3274 (1994), NASA Conf. Publ., Hampton, VA 963-983
133. Koolloos MFJ, ten Hoeve HJ, Grooteman FP, de Koning AU. Analysis of residual strength of stiffened panels with multiple site damage. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, The Netherlands, NLR Report NLR-TP-2001-342; 2001.
134. Galatolo R., and Nilsson K.-F. An experimental and numerical analysis of residual strength of butt-joint panels with multiple site damage. Engng Fract Mech 68 (2001) 1437-1461
135. Hsu C.-L., Lo J., Yu J., Lee X.-G., and Tan P. Residual strength analysis using CTOA criteria for fuselage structures containing multiple site damage. Engng Fract Mech 70 (2003) 525-545
136. Ciliato GD, Carneiro SHS. Analysis of the residual strength and link-up stress of aluminium plates with multi-site damage. In: 11th international conference fracture, Milan; 2005.
137. Ingraffea AR. Predicting residual strength of as fuselage section with/without MSD and with/without corrosion. USAF handbook for damage tolerant design, last update 2002, Problem No. FAC-2.
138. Kim J., Zhang G., and Gao X. Modeling of ductile fracture: application of the mechanism-based concepts. Int J Solids Struct 44 (2007) 1844-1862
139. Congourdeau F, Journet B. Damage tolerance of fuselage welded stiffened panels. In: Proceedings of the 22th ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Sheffield, UK; 2004. p. 361-83.
140. Farahmand B. Fracture mechanics of metals, composites, welds, and bolted joints. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 274-303 [chapter 6: Welded joints and applications].
141. Zhang X, Irving P, Edwards L, Fitzpatrick M, Sinclair I, Lin J, et al. The influence of residual stress on design and damage tolerance of welded aircraft structures. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Hamburg, Germany, vol. I; 2005. p. 1-265-281.
142. Staron P., Kocak M., Williams S., and Wescott A. Residual stress in friction stir-welded Al sheets. Physica B 350 (2004) e491-e493
143. Ainsworth R.A. The treatment of residual stresses in fracture assessments. Engng Fract Mech 24 (1986) 65-76
144. Dos Santos J., Çam G., Torster F., Isfan A., Riekehr S., Ventzke V., et al. Properties of power beam welded steels, Al- and Ti-alloys: significance of strength mismatch. Weld World 44 (2000) 42-64
145. Çam G., Koçak M., and Dos Santos J. Developments in laser welding of metallic materials and characterization of the joints. Weld World 43 (1999) 13-25
146. Schwalbe K-H, Kim Y-J, Hao S, Cornec A, Koçak M. EFAM ETM-MM 96: the ETM method for assessing the significance of crack-like defects in joints with mechanical heterogeneity (strength mismatch), GKSS Research Centre Geesthacht, GKSS Report 97/E/9; 1997.
147. Seib E, Kocak M. Fracture analysis of strength undermatched welds in thin-walled aluminium structures using the FITNET procedure. International Institute of Welding (IIW), IIW Doc. X-1577-2005; 2005.
148. Zerbst U, Brocks W, Heerens J, Schödel M, Scheider I, Steglich D, et al. Failure assessment concepts fort thin-walled structures. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Hamburg, Germany, vol. 1; 2005. p. 161-75.
149. Higgins A. Adhesive bonding of aircraft structures. Int J Adhes Adhes 20 (2000) 367-376
150. Schijve J. Crack stoppers and ARALL laminates. Engng Fract Mech 37 (1990) 405-421
151. Schmidt HJ, Schmidt-Brandecker B. Damage tolerance design and analysis of current future aircraft structure. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ICAS international air and space symposium and exposition: the next 100 years, Dayton, OH, AIAA 2003-2784; 2003.
152. Rose L. A cracked plate repaired by bonded reinforcements. Int J Fracture 18 (1982) 135-144
153. Baker A. Crack patching: experimental studies, practical applications. In: Baker A, Jones R, editors. Bonded Repair of Aircraft Structures. Martinus Nijhoff; 1988.
154. Valoroso N., and Champaney L. A damage-mechanics-based approach for modeling decohesion in adhesively bonded assemblies. Engng Fract Mech 73 (2006) 2774-2801
155. Carlberger T., and Stigh U. An explicit FE-model of impact fracture in an adhesive joint. Engng Fract Mech 74 (2007) 2247-2262
156. Jensen H.M. Interface fracture in adhesively bonded shell structures. Engng Fract Mech 75 3-4 (2008) 571-578
157. Heinimann MB, Bucci RJ, Kulak M, Garrat M. Improving the damage tolerance of aircraft structures through the use of selective reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ICAF symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Hamburg, Germany, vol. 1; 2005. p. 197-208.
158. Zhang X., and Li Y. Damage tolerance and fail safety of welded aircraft wing panels. AIAA J 43 (2005) 1613-1623
159. Colavita M, Bowler A, Zhang X, Irving PE. Adhesively bonded CFRP strap as fatigue crack growth retarders on AA2024-T3, SAMPE 2006, Long Beach; 2006.
160. Zhang X., Boscolo M., Figueroa-Gordon D., Allegri G., and Irving P. Fail safe of integral aircraft wing structures reinforced by bonded crack retarders. Engng Fract Mech 76 1 (2009) 114-133
161. Alderliesten R. Fatigue crack propagation and delamination growth in glare. PhD Thesis, TU Delft, Delft University Press; 2005.