Process perspective on image quality evaluation

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6808, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Leisti, Tuomas ^a   Halonen, Raisa ^b   Kokkonen, Anna ^b   Weckman, Hanna ^a   Mettänen, Marja ^c   Lensu, Lasse ^d   Ritala, Risto ^c   Oittinen, Pirkko ^b   Nyman, Göte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^d LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Image quality; Pair wise comparison method; Print quality; Qualitative methodology; Test image selection

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRINTING PRESSES; TESTING;

FOCUS OF ATTENTIONS; IMAGE QUALITY EVALUATIONS; IMAGE QUALITY METRICS; LASER PRINTERS; MENTAL PROCESS; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON METHOD; PRINT QUALITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGY; QUALITY EVALUATIONS; SUBJECTIVE QUALITIES; TEST IMAGE SELECTION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 57649087122     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.765438     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. M. P. Eckert and A. P. Bradley, "Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression", Signal Processing, 70, 177-200, 1998.
2. G. Gescheider A., Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985.
3. L. L. Thurstone, "A law of comparative judgment", Psychological Review, 34, 273-286, 1927.
4. R. A. Rensink, "The dynamic representation of scenes," Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42, 2000.
5. D. Simons & R. Rensink, "Change blindness: past, present and future", Tends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, pp. 16-20, 2005.
6. J. M. Wolfe & T. S. Horowitz, "What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 1-20,2004
7. J. Radun, T. Leisti, G. Nyman, J. Häkkinen, H. Ojanen, J. -. Olives and T. Vuori, "Content and quality: Interpretation- based estimation of image quality", ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, (in press).
8. G. Nyman, J. Radun, T. Leisti, J. Oja, H. Ojanen, J.-L. Olives, T. Vuori and J. Hakkinen, "What do users really perceive: Probing the subjective image quality", in Image Quality and System Performance III, edited by L. Cui and Y. Miyake, 6059, 1-7, Proceedings of the SPIE/IS&T, San Jose, California USA, 2006
9. J. R. Bettman, M. F. Luce and J. W. Payne, "Constructive consumer choice processes", Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217, 1998.
10. B. A. Mellers, A. Schwartz and A. D. J. Cooke, "Judgment and decision making", Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 447-477, 1998.
11. A. Tversky, "Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice", Psychological Review, 79, 281-299, 1972.
12. P.G. Engeldrum, "Image Quality Modeling: Where Are We?", Proc of IS&TPICS Conference, 251-255,1999.
13. B. W. Keelan, Handbook of Image Quality, Marcel Dekker inc., New York, 2002.