A proposal for a set of attributes relevant for Web portal data quality

Software Quality Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 513-542

  Caro, Angélica ^a   Calero, Coral ^b   Caballero, Ismael ^b   Piattini, Mario ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DEL BÍO BÍO   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data consumer; Data quality; Data quality attributes; Web portal

Indexed keywords

PORTALS;

CRITICAL ISSUES; DATA CONSUMER; DATA QUALITY; DATA QUALITY MODELS; QUALITY MODELING; QUALITY MODELS; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 57549114311     PISSN: 09639314     EISSN: 15731367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11219-008-9046-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aboelmeged, M. (2000). A soft system perspective on information quality in electronic commerce. In Fifth Conference on Information Quality (pp. 318-319).
2. Bouzeghoub, M., & Kedad, Z. (2001) Quality in data warehousing. In M. Piattini, C. Calero, & M. Genero (Eds.), Information and Database Quality. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bouzeghoub, M., & Peralta, V. (2004). A framework for analysis of data freshness. In International Workshop on Information Quality in Information Systems, (IQIS2004) (pp. 59-67). ACM, Paris, France.
4. Burgess, M., Fiddian, N., & Gray, W. (2004). Quality Measures and The Information Consumer. In Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 373-388).
5. Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Pernici, B. (2004). Data quality assessment from the user's perspective. In International Workshop on Information Quality in Information Systems, (IQIS2004) (pp. 68-73). ACM, Paris, Francia.
6. Caro, A., Calero, C., Caballero, I., & Piattini, M. (2005). Data quality in web applications: A state of the art. In P. Isaias & M. B. Nunes (Eds.), IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. 364-368). Lisboa-Portugal.
7. Caro, A., Calero, C., Caballero, I., & Piattini, M. (2006). Defining a data quality model for web portals. In WISE2006, The 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (pp. 363-374). Springer LNCS 4255, Wuhan, China.
8. Carver, J., Jaccheri, L., Morasca, S., & Shull, F. (2003). Issues in Using Students in Empirical Studies in Software Engineering Education. In 9th International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'03) (239 pp). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA.
9. Collins, H. (2001). Corporate portal definition and features. AMACOM.
10. Eppler, M. (2001). A generic framework for information quality in knowledge-intensive processes. In Proc. sixth international conference on information quality. pp. 329-346.
11. Eppler, M., Algesheimer, R., & Dimpfel, M. (2003). Quality criteria of content-driven websites and their influence on customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical test of an information quality framework. In Eighth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 108-120).
12. Eppler, M., & Muenzenmayer, P. (2002). Measuring information quality in the web context: A survey of state-of-the-art instruments and an aplication methodology. In Seventh International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 187-196).
13. Fugini, M., Mecella, M., Plebani, P., Pernici, B., & Scannapieco, M. (2002). Data Quality in Cooperative Web Information Systems.
14. Gertz, M., Ozsu, T., Saake, G., & Sattler, K.-U. (2004). Report on the dagstuhl seminar "Data Quality on the Web". SIGMOD Record, 33(1), 127-132.
15. Graefe, G. (2003). Incredible Information on the Internet: Biased information provision and a lack of credibility as a cause of insufficient information quality. In Eighth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 133-146).
16. M. Höst B. Regnell C. Wohlin 2000 Using students as subjects-a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment Empirical Software Engineering 5 201 214
17. Katerattanakul, P., & Siau, K. (1999). Measuring information quality of web sites: Development of an instrument. In 20th International Conference on Information System (pp. 279-285).
18. Katerattanakul, P., & Siau, K. (2001). Information quality in internet commerce desing. In M. Piattini, C. Calero, & M. Genero (Eds.), Information and database quality (pp. 45-56). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews.
20. Kitchenham, B., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2002a). Principles of survey research part 2: Designing a survey. In SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes (Vol. 27, pp. 18-20). ACM Press.
21. Kitchenham, B., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2002b). Principles of survey research part 4: Questionnaire evaluation. In SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes (Vol. 27, pp. 20-23). ACM Press.
22. Kitchenham, B., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2002c). Principles of survey research: Part 3: Constructing a survey instrument. In SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes (Vol. 27, pp. 20-24). ACM Press.
23. Kitchenham, B., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2002d). Principles of survey research: Part 5: Populations and samples. In SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes (Vol. 27, pp. 17-20). ACM Press.
24. Kitchenham, B., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2003). Principles of survey research part 6: Data analysis. In SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes (Vol. 28, pp. 24-27). ACM Press.
25. S. A. Knight J. M. Burn 2005 Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the world wide web Informing Science Journal 8 159 172
26. Kopcso, D., Pipino, L., & Rybolt, W. (2000). The assesment of web site quality. In Fifth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 97-108).
27. J. A. Krosnick 1999 Survey research Annual Review of Psychology 50 537 567
28. Lee, Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management, 40(2), 133-146.
29. Mahdavi, M., Shepherd, J., & Benatallah, B. (2004). A collaborative approach for caching dynamic data in portal applications. In Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on Australian database (Vol. 27, pp. 181-188).
30. Marchetti, C., Mecella, M., Scannapieco, M., & Virgillito, A. (2003). Enabling data quality notification in cooperative information systems through a web-service based architecture. In Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (pp. 329-332).
31. Melkas, H. (2004). Analyzing information quality in virtual service networks with qualitative interview data. In Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 74-88).
32. M. Á. Moraga C. Calero M. Piattini 2006 Comparing different quality models for portals Online Information Review 30 555 568
33. Moustakis, V., Litos, C., Dalivigas, A., & Tsironis, L. (2004). Website quality assesment criteria. In Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 59-73).
34. Naumann, F., & Rolker, C. (2000). Assesment methods for information quality criteria. In Fifth International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 148-162).
35. R. Nelson P. Todd B. Wixom 2005 Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehouse Journal of Management Information Systems 21 199 235
36. Pernici, B., & Scannapieco, M. (2002). Data quality in web information systems. In 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (pp. 397-413).
37. Pfleeger, S. L., & Kitchenham, B. (2001). Principles of survey research: Part 1: Turning lemons into lemonade. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes (Vol. 26, pp. 16-18). ACM Press.
38. Pressman, R. (2001). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. 5/e. McGraw-Hill.
39. Redman, T. (2000). Data quality: The field guide. Boston: Digital Press.
40. C. Reeves D. Bednar 1994 Defining quality: Alternatives and implications Academy of Management Review 19 419 445
41. Strong, D., Lee, Y., & Wang, R. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110.
42. Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 5-33.
43. W. Winkler 2004 Methods for evaluating and creating data quality Information Systems 29 531 550
44. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlson, M., Regnell, B., & A., W. (2000). Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
45. Z. Yang S. Cai Z. Zhou N. Zhou 2004 Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals Information and Management. Elsevier Science 42 575 589
46. Zhu, Y., & Buchmann, A. (2002). Evaluating and selecting web sources as external information resources of a data warehouse. In 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (pp. 149-160).