Anatomy teaching in the 21st century - Dead cool or cold dead?

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 136-137

  Gogalniceanu, Petrut ^a,d   Madani, Hardi ^b   Paraskeva, Paraskevas A ^c   Darzi, Ara ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b North Central Thames Foundation School   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CADAVER; DISSECTION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL THEORY; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING STYLE; LETTER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TEACHING;

EID: 57549091861     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.27     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. 2007. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medicine course? Surg Radiol Anat 29:173-180.
2. Dozois E. 2008. Laparoscopic anatomy for medical students. Anat Sci Ed 1: 135.
3. Gogalniceanu P, Madani H, Paraskeva PA, Darzi A. 2008. A minimally invasive approach to undergraduate anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Ed 1:46-47.
4. Magtibay PM. 2008. Traditional cadaveric anatomy... gross! Endoscopic anatomy is where it is at. Anat Sci Ed 1:92-93.
5. Older J. 2004. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2:79-90.
6. Patel KM, Moxham BJ. 2008. The relationship between teaching outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists. Clin Anat 21:182-189.