Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 755-764

  Ozel, Emre ^a   Korkmaz, Yonca ^b   Attar, Nuray ^b   Karabulut, Erdem ^b  

^a Baskent University ^*

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Flowable composite; Polishing; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

ADMIRA FLOW; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOGLASS FLOW; DIAMOND; FERRIC ION; FERRIC OXIDE; FILTEK SUPREME; FILTEK Z250; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; GRANDIO; HEMITERPENE; INORGANIC COMPOUND; LATEX; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; RUBBER; SILICON CARBIDE; SILICON DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOOTH CEMENT; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; VISCOSITY;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CARBON COMPOUNDS, INORGANIC; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DIAMOND; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; HEMITERPENES; HUMANS; LATEX; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; POLYURETHANES; SILICON COMPOUNDS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; VISCOSITY;

EID: 57449119879     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.27.755     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 567-577.
2. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 516-521.
3. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 68-76.
4. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42: 613-627.
5. Strassler HE, Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993; 5: 12-17.
6. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finising procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 101-106.
7. Jefferies SR, Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ. Three composite finishing systems: a multisite in vitro evaluation. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 181-185.
8. Tate WH, DeSchepper EJ, Cody T. Quantitative analysis of six composite polishing techniques on a hybrid composite material. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 30-32.
9. Attar N. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 1: 27-35.
10. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 203-211.
11. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing / polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 275-279.
12. Yap AU, Ong SB, Yap WY, Tan WS, Yeo JC. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 462-467.
13. Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE, Hughes PJ. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 36-42.
14. Hondrum SO, Fernández R Jr. Contouring, finishing and polishing Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 30-36.
15. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacidmodified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 607-614.
16. Duke ES, Trevino DF. A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1998; 77: 13-16, 25.
17. Choi MS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 347-353.
18. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 325-330.
19. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1405-1411.
20. Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33: 305-318, 210-219.
21. Uctasli MB, Bala O, Gullu A. Surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 1197-1202.
22. Yazici AR, Müftü A, Kugel G. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 9-17.
23. Stoddard JW, Johnson GH. An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:491-495.
24. Roulet JF, Hirt T, Lutz F. Surface roughness and marginal behaviour of experimental and commercial composites: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 1984; 11: 499-509.
25. Quiroz L, Lentz DL. The effect of polishing procedures on the surface smoothness of several light-cured posterior composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1986; 7: 676-678.
26. Turkun LS. Effect of re-use of a disposable micropolisher on the surface of a microhybrid resin composite. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 279-282.
27. Lutz F, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. New finishing instruments for composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 107: 575-580.
28. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19: 121-134.
29. Smales RJ, Webster DA, Leppard PI. Predictions of restoration deterioration. J Dent 1992; 20: 215-220.
30. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 169-173.
31. St Germain HA Jr, Meiers JC. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 103-109.
32. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 185-192.
33. Chandler HH, Bowen RL, Paffenbarger GC. Method for finishing composite restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 83: 344-348.
34. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 193-197.
35. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 225-227.
36. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. Influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 44-50.