The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 193-197

  Reis, André Figueiredo ^a   Giannini, Marcelo ^b   Lovadino, José Roberto ^b   Dos Santos Dias, Carlos Tadeu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALERT COMPOSITE RESIN; ALUMINUM OXIDE; DIAMOND; RESIN; RUBBER; SOLITAIRE; TUNGSTEN CARBIDE; TUNGSTEN DERIVATIVE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; VISCOSITY;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DIAMOND; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RUBBER; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TUNGSTEN COMPOUNDS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0036617608     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bowen RL. Dental filling material comprising vinyl-silane-treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the reaction product of bysphenol and glycidil methacrylate. US Patent 3,006,112, 1962.
2. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composites. State-of-the-art clinical applications. Dent Clin N Am 1993; 37: 411-418.
3. Leinfelder KF. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 230-237.
4. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 234-249.
5. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, et al. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: Two-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 164-169.
6. Eames WB, Strain JD, Weitman RT, et al. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam and silicate restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 89: 1111-1117.
7. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Santos JFF, et al. Five-year clinical evaluation of anterior and posterior restorations of composite resin. Oper Dent 1980; 5: 57-65.
8. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: The materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 663-676.
9. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Lesaffre E, et al. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: In vivo wear results. J Dent 1993; 21: 79-86.
10. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987; 12: 53-78.
11. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 207-211.
12. Bayne SC, Heyman HO, Swift Jr EJ. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 687-701.
13. Iazetti G, Burgess JO, Gardiner D, et al. Color stability of fluoride-containing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2000; 25:520-525.
14. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20: 544-550.
15. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 375-383.
16. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 1998; 42: 613-627.
17. Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin N Am 1989; 33: 305-318.
18. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, et al. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: An in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 352-262.
19. Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 169-173.
20. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite resin surfaces after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 101-106.
21. Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of food to stain two composites. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43: 542-545.
22. Zalkind MM, Keisar O, Ever-Hadani P, et al. Accumulation of Streptococcus mutans on light-cured composites and amalgam: An in vitro study. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 187-190.
23. Berastegui E, et al. Surface roughness of finished composites resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 742-749.
24. Stoddard JW, Johnson GH. An evaluation of polishing agents for composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 491-495.
25. Tjan AHL, Chan CA. The polishability of posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 138-146.
26. Van Noort R, Davis LG. The surface finish of composite resin restorative materials. Br Dent J 1984; 157: 360-364, 1984.
27. Wilson F, Heath JR, Watts DC. Finishing composite restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 79-87.
28. Toledano M, De La Torre FJ, Osorio R. Evaluation of two polishing methods for resin composites. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 328-330.
29. Glants PO, Larson LA. Surface roughness of composite resins before and after finishing. Acta Odontol Scand 1972; 30: 335.
30. McLundie AC, Murray FD. Comparison of methods used in finishing composite resin. A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 31: 164-171.
31. Lee HL, Swartz ML. Scanning electron microscope study of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1970; 49: 149-158.
32. Maccchi RL, Craig RG. Physical and mechanical properties of composite restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1969; 78: 328.
33. McCabe JF, Chen C, Caddick RJK. The finishing of composite restorations. Br Dent J 1978; 145: 101-104.
34. Chandler HH, Bowen RL, Paffenbarger GC. Method for finishing composite restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 83: 344-348.
35. Heath JR, Wilson HJ. Surface roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 1976; 140: 131-140.
36. Pratten D, Johnson G. An evaluation of finishing instruments for an anterior and a posterior composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 154-158.
37. Strassler H. Polishing composite resins to perfection depends on the filler. Dent Off 1990; 10; 9-10.
38. Christensen RP, Christensen GJ. Comparison of instruments and commercial pastes used for finishing and polishing composite resin. Gen Dent 1981;29:40-45.
39. Chung K. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 325-330.
40. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Kijayaraghavan TV, et al. The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: A profilometric and scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 34-38.
41. Boghosian AA, Randolph RG, Jekkals VJ. Rotatory instrument finishing of micro-filled and small-particle hybrid composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115: 299.