Enhancing learning outcomes with an interactive knowledge-based learning environment providing narrative feedback

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 265-281

  Stranieri, Andrew ^a   Yearwood, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

Author keywords

Case based learning; decision making; Interactive learning environment; Narrative

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349180691     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820802114176     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bennett, W. L. and Feldman, M. S. (1981) Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: Justice and judgment in American culture, Rutgers University Press, Brunswick, NJ
2. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. S., Hesselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K. and Williams, S. M. (1990) Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. Cognition, education, and multi-media: Exploration ideas in high technology, pp. 115-141. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
3. Bransford, J. D. and Vye, N. J. (1989) Cognitive research and its implications for instruction. Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research, pp. 173-205. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA
4. Bromby, M. and Hall, M. J. (2002) The development and rapid evaluation of the knowledge model of ADVOKATE: An advisory system to assess the credibility of eyewitness testimony. Fifteenth Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2002 Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 143-152.
5. Bruner, J. (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Cavazza, M., Charles, F. and Mead, S. J. (2002) Character-based interactive storytelling. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17:4, pp. 17-24.
7. Cognition Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990) Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19:6, pp. 2-10.
8. Dryzak, J. and Niemeyer, S. (2006) Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, pp. 634-649.
9. Frize, M. and Frasson, C. (2000) Decision support and intelligent tutoring systems in medical education. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 23:4, pp. 266-269.
10. Geoffrey, N. (2005) Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39:4, pp. 418-427.
11. Herreid, C. F. (1998) What makes a good case? Some basic rules of good storytelling help teachers generate student excitement in the classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching (January), pp. 163-165.
12. Hung, D., Tan, S., Cheung, W. S. and Hu, C. (2004) Supporting problem solving with case-stories learning scenario and video-based collaborative learning technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7:2, pp. 120-128.
13. Iuppa, N., Weltman, G. and Gordon, A. (2004) Bringing Hollywood storytelling techniques to branching storylines for training applications. Proceedings of narrative and interactive learning environments (NILE 2004), pp. 1-8. Center for Computer Games Research, Edinburgh
14. Merseth, K. (1991) The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42:4, pp. 243-249.
15. Mezirow, J. (2000) Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. Learning as Transformation, 4:4, pp. 335-361.
16. Murray, J. (2000) Hamlet on the holodeck. The future of narrative in cyberspace, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Neuhauser, P. C. (1993) Corporate legends and lore: The power of storytelling as a management tool, McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Peinado, F., Gervas, P. and Moreno-Ger, P. (2005) Interactive storytelling in educational enviroments. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on multimedia and ICT in education: Recent research developments in learning technologies, III Badajoz, Spain Formatex Research Centre, pp. 1345-1349. Extremadura, Spain
19. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988) Narrative knowing and the human sciences, SUNY Press, Albany, NY
20. Polti, G. (1922) The art of inventing characters, Century Bookbindery, New York
21. Riedl, M. and Young, R. (2004) An intent-driven planner for multi-agent story generation. Proceedings of the 3rd international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2004) IEEE Computer Society, pp. 186-193. New York
22. Schank, R. C. (1996) Goal-based scenarios: Case-based reasoning meets learning by doing. Case-based reasoning: Experiences, lessons and future directions, pp. 295-347. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA
23. Stranieri, A., Yearwood, J., Gervasoni, S., Garner, S., Deans, C. and Johnstone, A. (2004) Web-based decision support for structured reasoning in health. Proceedings of the twelfth national health informatics conference (HIC 2004) Brisbane Melbourne: Health Informatics Society of Australia, Australia
24. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M. and Lewis, B. (1999) A hybrid rule-neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7:23, pp. 153-183.
25. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J. and Yearwood, J. (2001) Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 16:4, pp. 331-358.
26. Van Horn, M. (1986) A guide to expert systems, Bantam Books, New York
27. Weber, G. and Brusilovsky, P. (2001) ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12:4, pp. 351-384.
28. Woolf, B., Blegen, D., Jansen, J. H. and Verloop, A. (1987) Teaching a complex industrial process. Artificial intelligence and education: Learning environments and tutoring systems, pp. 413-427. Ablex Publishing Corp, Norwood, NJ
29. Yearwood, J. and Stranieri, A. (1999) The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: A third generation legal knowledge based system. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on artificial ntelligence and law (ICAIL'990) ACM Press, pp. 117-137. New York
30. Yearwood, J. and Stranieri, A. (2006) The generic actual argument model of practical reasoning. Decision Support Systems, 41, pp. 358-379.