A reference model for conceptual modelling of production planning processes

Production Planning and Control

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 725-734

  Hernandez, Jorge E ^a   Mula, Josefa ^a   Ferriols, Francisco J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Conceptual modelling; Modelling methodology; Production planning; Reference model

Indexed keywords

PLANNING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; CONCEPTUAL MODELS; FINITE PLANNING HORIZONS; MODELLING METHODOLOGY; PRODUCTION PLANNING; PRODUCTION PLANS; REFERENCE MODEL; REFERENCE MODELS; SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATIONS; TOTAL COSTS;

PRODUCTION CONTROL;

EID: 57349179464     PISSN: 09537287     EISSN: 13665871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537280802476128     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aguilar-Saven, R.S., 2004. Business process modelling: review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 90 (2), 129-149.
2. Armstrong Process, Group Open UP/Basic methodology, 2006. [online]. Available from: http://www.aprocessgroup.com/products [Accessed 06 June 2008].
3. Bodart, F., et al., 2001. Should optional properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 12 (4), 384-405.
4. Bolloju, N. and Leung, F.S.K., 2006. Assisting novice analysts in developing quality conceptual models with UML. Communications of the ACM, 49 (7), 108-112.
5. Boma, Process definition, 1996. [online]. Available from: http://www.sesh.com/procdef.html [Accessed 06 June 2008].
6. Bonner, A.J. and Kifer, M., 1998. The state of change: a survey, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1472, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1-36.
7. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I., 1999. The unified modelling language user guide, edited by Addison-Wesley, USA.
8. Davis, A.M., 1993. Software requirements: objects, functions and states. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Doumeingts, G., Chen, D., and Marcotte, D., 1992. Concepts, model and methods for the design of production management systems. Computers in Industry, 19, 89-111.
10. Gemino, A. and Wand, Y., 2005. Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: comparison of mandatory and optional properties. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55 (3), 301-326.
11. Giannoccaro, I. and Pontrandolfo, P., 2001. Models for supply chains management: a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the Production and Operations Management Conference POMS mastery in the new millennium, Orlando, FL, USA.
12. Hernández, J.E., et al., 2008. A conceptual model for the production and transport planning process. An application to the automobile sector. Computers in Industry, 59, 842-852.
13. Holt, A.W., Ramsey, H.R., and Grimes, J.D., 1983. Coordination systems technology as a programming environment. Electrical Communication, 57(4), 307-314.
14. IDEF, Family of methods, 2003. [online] Available from: http://www.idef.com [Accessed 6 June 2008).
15. Kosanke, K. and Zelm, M., 1999. CIMOSA modelling processes. Computers in Industry, 40 (2-3), 141-153.
16. Lakin, R., Capon, N., and Botten, N., 1996. BPR enabling software for the financial services industry. Management Services, 40 (3), 18-20.
17. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., and Solvberg, A., 1994. Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software, 11 (2), 42-49.
18. Maier, R., 2001. Organizational concepts and measures for the evaluation of data modeling. In: S. Becker, ed. Developing quality complex database systems: practices, techniques and technologies. Hershey, PA: DEA Group Publishing, 1-27.
19. Misic, V.B. and Zhao, J.L., 2000. Evaluating the quality of reference models; edited by Springer-Verlag Berlin, 484-498.
20. Moody, D.L., 2005. Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55 (3), 243.
21. Mula, J., et al., 2006. Models for production planning under uncertainty: a review. International Journal of Production Economics, 103 (1), 271-285.
22. Mylopoulos, J., 1992. Conceptual modeling and telos, In: P. Loucopoulos and R. Zicari, eds. Conceptual modeling, databases, and CASE: an integrated view of information systems development. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1-20.
23. Olive, A., 2000. Time and change in conceptual modeling of information systems, In: S. Brinkkemper, E. Lindencrona and A. Solvberg, eds. Information systems engineering: state of the art and research themes. Berlin: Springer, 289-304.
24. Olive, A., 2003a. Derivation rules in object-oriented conceptual modeling languages, In: Proceedings of CAiSE03, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2681, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 404-420.
25. Olive, A., 2003b. Integrity constraints definition in objectoriented conceptual modeling languages, In: Proceedings of ER03, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2813, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 349-362.
26. Olive, A., 2004. Definition of events and their effects in object-oriented conceptual modeling languages, In: Proceedings of ER 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3288, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 136-149.
27. Olive, A. and Raventos, R., 2006. Modeling events as entities in object-oriented conceptual modeling languages. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 58 (3), 243-262.
28. Phillips, C. and Kemp, E., 2002. In support of user interface design in the rational unified process. Australian Computer Science Communications, 24 (4), 21-27.
29. Poler, R., Lario, F.C., and Doumeingts, G., 2002. Dynamic modelling of decision systems (DMDS). Computers in Industry, 49 (2), 175-193.
30. Roshannejad, A. and Eberlein, A., 2001. The use of conceptual models during the design of new telecommunication services, Electrical and Computer Engineering. In: Canadian Conference, Toronto. Vol. 2, 1163-1168.
31. Siau, K., 2004. Informational and computational equivalence in comparing information modelling methods. Journal of Database Management, 15 (1), 73-86.
32. Vernadat, F.B., 1996. Enterprise modelling and integration. London: Chapman & Hall.
33. Zelm, M., Vernadat, F.B., and Kosanke, K., 1995. The CIMOSA business modelling process. Computers in Industry, 21 (2), 123-142.