Assisting novice analysts in developing quality conc

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 108-112

  Bolloju, Narasimha ^a   Leung, Felix S K ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MODELS; NOVICE ANALYSTS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE (UML).;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA FLOW ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746061659     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 00010782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1139922.1139926     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Adolph, S. and Bramble, P. Patterns for Effective Use Cases. Addison Weslcy, Boston, 2003.
2. Agarwal, R. and Sinha, A. Object-oriented modeling with UML: A study of developers' perceptions. Commun. ACM 46, 9 (Sept. 2003), 248-256.
3. Ambler, S. The Elements of UML Style. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
4. Cockburn, A. Writing Effective Use Cases, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2001.
5. Fowler, M. Analysis Patterns: Reusable object Models. Addison Wesley, MenloPark, CA, 1997.
6. Introduction to OMG's Unified Modeling Language (UML) (Mar, 27, 2004); www.omg.org/gettingstarted/what_is_uml.htm.
7. Lindland, O., Sindre, G., and Sølvberg, A. Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software 11, 2 (Mar. 1994), 42-49.
8. Moody, D., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., and Sølvberg, A. Evaluating the quality of information models: Empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (Portland, OR, May 3-10). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2003, 295-305.
9. Schenk, K., Vitalari, N., and Shannon Davis, K. Differences between novice and expert systems analysts: What do we know and wliat do we do? journal of Management Information Systems 15, 1 (Summer 1998), 9-50.
10. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., and Weber, R. Using ontology to validate conceptual models. Commun. ACM'46, 10 (Oct. 2003), 85-89.
11. Wand, Y. and Weber, R. Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling: A research agenda. Information Systems Research 13, 4 (Dec. 2002), 363-376.