Definition of events and their effects in object-oriented conceptual modeling languages

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3288, Issue , 2004, Pages 136-149

  Olive, Antoni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DATA MINING;

BEHAVIORAL MODEL; CONCEPTUAL MODELING LANGUAGES; DERIVATION RULES; ENTITY-TYPES; LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS; MODEL EVENTS; OBJECT ORIENTED; TYPE-SPECIALIZATION;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 25144489346     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_12     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrial, J-R. The B-Book. Cambridge University Press, 1996,779p.
2. Bonner, A.J.; Kifer, M. The State of Change: A Survey. LNCS 1472,1998, pp. 1-36.
3. Borgida, A.; Greenspan, S. Data and Activities: Exploiting Hierarchies of Classes. Workshop on Data Abstraction, Databases and Conceptual Modelling, 1980, pp. 98-100.
4. Bubenko, J.A.jr. Information Modeling in the Context of System Development. Proc. IFIP 1980, North-Holland, 1980, pp. 395-411.
5. Cabot, J.; Olive, A.; Teniente, E. Representing Temporal Information in UML. Proc. UML'03. LNCS 2863, pp. 44-59.
6. Ceri, S.; Fraternalli, P. Designing Database Applications with Objects and Rules. The IDEA Methodology. Addison-Wesley, 1997,579p.
7. Coleman, D.; Arnold, P.; Bodoff, S.; Dollin, C.; Gilchrist, H.; Hayes, F.; Jeremaes, P. Object-Oriented Development. The Fusion Method. Prenticel Hall, 1994,316p.
8. Cook, S.; Daniels, J. Designing Object Systems. Object-Oriented Modelling with Syntropy. Prentice Hall, 1994,389 p.
9. Costal, D.; Olive, A.; Sancho, M-R. 'Temporal Features of Class Populations and Attributes in Conceptual Models. Proc. ER'97, LNCS 1331, Springer, pp. 57-70.
10. D'Souza, D.F.; Wills, A.C. Objects, Components and Frameworks with UML. The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, 1999,785 p.
11. Dardenne, A.; van Lamsweerde, A.; Fickas, S. Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20(1993), pp. 3-50.
12. Davis, A.M. Software Requirements. Objects, Functions and States. Prentice-Hall, 1993.
13. Embley, D.W.; Kurtz, B.D.; Woodfield, S.N. Object-Oriented System Analysis. A ModelDriven Approach. Yourdon Press, 1992,302 p.
14. Frias, L.; Olive, A.; Queralt, A. EU-Rent Car Rentals Specification. UPC, Research Report LSI 03-59-R, 2003,159 p., http://www.lsi.upc.es/dept/techreps/ techreps.html.
15. Gamma, E.; Helm, R.; Johnson, R.; Vlissides, J. Design Patterns. Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1995,395 p.
16. Harel, D.; Gery, E. Executable Object Modeling with Statecharts. IEEE Computer, July 1997, pp. 31-42.
17. IEEE. IEEE Standard for Conceptual Modeling Language Syntax and Semantics for IDEF1X97 (IDEFobject). IEEE Std 1320.2-1998,1999.
18. ISO/TC97/SC5/WG3. Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base, J.J. van Griethuysen (ed.), March, 1982.
19. Jungclaus, R.; Saake, G.; Hartmann, T.; Sernadas, C. TROLL-A Language for ObjectOriented Specification of Information Systems. ACM TOIS, 14(2), 1996, pp. 175-211.
20. Larman, C. Applying UML and Patterns. Prentice Hall, 2002,627 p.
21. Martin, J.; Odell, J.J. Object-Oriented Methods: A Foundation. Prentice Hall, 1995,412 p.
22. Martin, R.C. Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns and Practices. Prentice Hall, 2003,529p.
23. Mellor, S.J.; Balcer, M.J. Executable UML. A Foundation for Model-Driven Architecture. Addison-Wesleyy, 2002,368p.
24. Mylopoulos, J.; Bernstein, P.A.; Wong, H.K.T. A Language Facility for Designing Database-Intensive Applications. ACM TODS, 5(2), pp. 185-207,1980.
25. Olivé, A. Time and Change in Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems. In Brinkkemper, S.;' Lindencrona, E.; Solvberg, A. Information Systems Engineering. State of the Art and Research Themes, Springer, 2000, pp. 289-304.
26. Olivé, A. Derivation Rules in Object-Oriented Conceptual Modeling Languages. Proc. CAiSE 2003, LNCS 2681, pp. 404-420.
27. Olivé, A. Integrity Constraints Definition in Object-Oriented Conceptual Modeling Languages. Proc. ER 2003, LNCS 2813, pp. 349-362,2003.
28. Olivé, A.; Teniente, E. Derived types and taxonomic constraints in conceptual modeling. Information Systems, 27(6), 2002, pp. 391-409.
29. OMG. UML Superstructure 2.0 Final Adopted Specification, 2003, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc7ptc/2003-08-02.
30. Robinson, K.; Berrisford, G. Object-oriented SSADM. Prentice Hall, 1994,524p.
31. Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I.; Booch, G. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1999,550 p.
32. Selic.B.; Gullekson, G.; and Ward, P.T. Real-Time Object-Oriented Modeling. John Wiley & Sons, 1994,525p.
33. Teisseire, M; Poncelet, P.; Cichetti, R. Dynamic Modelling with Events, Proc. CAiSE'94, LNCS 811, pp. 186-199,1994.
34. Wieringa, R. A survey of structured and object-oriented software specification methods and techniques. ACM Computing Surveys, 30(4), December 98, pp. 459-527.