Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: principles and prototypes

Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web 2008, WWW'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 705-714

  Ullrich, Carsten ^a   Borau, Kerstin ^a   Luo, Heng ^a   Tan, Xiaohong ^a   Shen, Liping ^a   Shen, Ruimin ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Education; Research; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

APPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; INTERNET;

DEPTH ANALYSIS; ENHANCE LEARNINGS; ONE HANDS; SUPPORTED LEARNINGS; TEACHING AND LEARNINGS; WEB 2.0;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 57349137160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1367497.1367593     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. H. S. Al-Khalifa and H. C. Davis. Folksannotation: A semantic metadata tool for annotating learning resources using folksonomies and domain ontologies. Innovations in Information Technology, November 2006.
2. B. Alexander. Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDU CAUSE Review, 41(2):32-44, March/April 2006.
3. C. Anderson. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, July 2006.
4. J. R. Anderson. The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.
5. J. R. Anderson, A. T. Corbett, K. R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2):167-207, 1995.
6. P. Anderson. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Technical report, JISC, 2007.
7. H. Barrett. Electronic portfolios: Digital stories of lifelong and lifewide learning, 2005. Keynote at ePortfolio 2005. This is an electronic document. Date retrieved: August 28, 2006. http://www.eife-l.org/ publications/eportfolio/proceedings/ep2005/ presentations/barrett-Eifel2005.pdf.
8. S. Bateman, C. Brooks, and G. Mccalla. Collaborative tagging approaches for ontological metadata in adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (SW-EL 2006), pages 3-12, Dublin, Ireland, 2006.
9. T. Berners-Lee. Weaving the Web, Orion Business Books, 1999.
10. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5):34-43, 2001.
11. M. Birbeck and B. Adida. RDFa primer. W3C working draft, W3C, Oct. 2007. http://www.w3.org/ TR/2007/WD-xhtml-rdfa-primer-20071026/.
12. J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1):32-41, 1989.
13. J. S. Bruner. On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.
14. E. Brynjolfsson, Y. J. Hu, and D. Simester. Goodbye Pareto Principle, Hello Long Tail: The Effect of Search Costs on the Concentration of Product Sales. SSRN eLibrary, 2007.
15. M. Caceres and A. van Kesteren. Widgets 1.0. W3C working draft, W3C, Oct. 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-widgets-20071013/.
16. F. Carmagnola, F. Cena, and C. Gena. User modeling in the social web. In B. Apolloni, R. J. Howlett, and L. C. Jain, editors, Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 11th International Conference, KES 2007, XVII Italian Workshop on Neural Networks, Proceedings, Part III, volume 4694 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 745-752, Vietri sul Mare, Italy, 2007. Springer.
17. J. Collins, M. Hammond, and J. Wellington. Teaching and learning with multimedia. Routledge, London, 1997.
18. A. Dash. Introducing the microcontent client, 2002. This is an electronic document. Date of publication: November 13, 2002. Date retrieved: November 1, 2007. http://www.anildash.com/magazine/2002/ll/ introduc ing-the.html.
19. S. Downes. E-learning 2.0. ehearn, 2005(10):l, 2005.
20. N. Henze and W. Nejdl. Adaptation in open corpus hypermedia. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12:325-350, 2001.
21. R. Khare. Microformats: The next (small) thing on the semantic web? IEEE Internet Computing, 10(l):68-75, 2006.
22. G. Lawton. Web 2.0 creates security challenges. Computer, 40(10):13-16, 2007.
23. R. Lelouche. Intelligent tutoring systems from birth to now. Kunstliche Intelligent, 4:5-11, 1999.
24. S. Mantyka. The Math Plague: How to Survive School Mathematics. MayT Consulting Cooperation, 2007.
25. E. Melis, G. Goguadze, M. Homik, P. Libbrecht, C. Ullrich, and S. Winterstein. Semantic-aware components and services of ActiveMath. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3):405-423, 2006.
26. M. D. Merrill. Instructional transaction theory: Instructional design based on knowledge objects. In C. M. Reigeluth, editor, Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, volume 2, pages 397-424. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
27. M. Niss. Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: the danish KOM project. Technical report, IMFUFA, Roskilde University, 2002.
28. R. Noss and N. Pachler. The Challenge of New Technologies: Doing Old Things in a New Way, or Doing New Things? In P. Mortimore, editor, Understanding Pedagogy and its impact on learning., pages 195-211. Sage, London, 1999.
29. OECD, editor. Learning for Tomorrows World First Results from, PISA 2003. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publishing, 2004.
30. T. O'Reilly. What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the next generation of software, 2005. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/ tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
31. S. Papert. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1980.
32. R. Schulmeister. Grundlagen hypermedialer Lernsysteme. Oldenbourg, Mtlnchen, Germany, 2002. English version: http://www.izhd.uni-hamburg.de/ paginae/Book/Frames/start-frame.html, last accessed 29.10.2007.
33. M. Sharpies, J. Taylor, and G. Vavoula. Towards a Theory of Mobile Learning. In Proceedings of mLearn 2005 Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 2005. http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Sharples-y, 20Theory°/20of °/20Hobile . pdf.
34. A. Smith. Plagiarism and google generation under spotlight, 2006. This is an electronic document. Date of publication: June 19, 2006. Date retrieved: October 29, 2007. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/jun/19/news. highereducation.
35. S. O. Tergan. Hypertext und Hypermedia: Konzeption, Lernmoglichkeiten, Lernprobleme und Perspektiven. In P. Klimsa and L. Issing, editors, Information und Lernen mit Multimedia und Internet - Lehrbuch fur Studium und Praxis, pages 99-112. Beltz Verlag, Weinheim, 2002.
36. M. D. Thang, V. Dimitrova, and K. Djemame. Personalised mashups: Opportunities and challenges for user modelling. In C. Conati, K. F. McCoy, and G. Paliouras, editors, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on User Modeling, 0volume 4511 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 415-419, Corfu, Greece, 2007. Springer.
37. C. Ullrich. The learning-resource-type is dead, long live the learning- resource-type! Learning Objects and Learning Designs, 1(1):7-15, 2005.
38. C. Ullrich. Course Generation as a Hierarchical Task Network Planning Problem,. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Saarland University, Saarbriicken, 2007.
39. M. van Harmelen. Personal learning environments. In ICALT '06: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pages 815-816, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
40. J. Vassileva. Dynamic Courseware Generation: at the Cross Point of CAL, ITS and Authoring. In Proceedings International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE'95, pages 290-297, Singapore, 1995.
41. L. S. Vygotsky. Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.
42. X. Wu, L. Zhang, and Y. Yu. Exploring social annotations for the semantic web. In WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 417-426, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
43. J. Zhang. A cultural look at information and communication technologies in eastern education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3):301-314, June 2007.