Pluralist action research: A review of the information systems literature

Information Systems Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 31-54

  Chiasson, Mike ^a   Germonprez, Matt ^b   Mathiassen, Lars ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action research; IS research methodology; Pluralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349136025     PISSN: 13501917     EISSN: 13652575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00297.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aaen, I., Arent, J., Mathiassen, L. Ngwenyama, O. (2001) A conceptual map of software process improvement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 13, 123 146.
2. Avgerou, C. (2000) Information systems: what sort of science is it? Omega, 28, 567 579.
3. Avison, D., Baskerville, R. Myers, M. (2001) Controlling action research projects. Information Technology & People, 14, 28 45.
4. Baskerville, R. Stage, J. (1996) Controlling prototype development through risk analysis. MIS Quarterly, 20, 481 504.
5. Baskerville, R. Wood-Harper, T. (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 235 246.
6. Baskerville, R. Wood-Harper, T. (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7, 90 107.
7. Burstein, F. Linger, H. (2003) Supporting post-Fordist work practices: a knowledge management framework for dynamic intelligent decision support. Journal of Information Technology and People, 16, 289 305.
8. Checkland, P. (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
9. Checkland, P. (1991) From framework through experience to learning: the essential nature of action research. In : Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Nissen, H.E. et al eds), pp. 397 403. Elsevier, North-Holland, The Netherlands.
10. Checkland, P. Holwell, S. (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11, 9 21.
11. Chiasson, M. Dexter, A. (2001) Systems development conflict during the use of an information systems prototyping method of action research: implications for practice. Information Technology & People, 14, 91 108.
12. Coghlan, D. (2001) Insider action research projects: implications for practicing managers. Management Learning, 32, 49 60.
13. Davison, R. (1998) An action research perspective of group support systems: how to improve meetings in Hong Kong. PhD dissertation, City University of Hong Kong. [WWW document]. URL http://www.is.cityu.edu.hk/staff/isrobert/ phd/phd.htm (last accessed 20 February 2008).
14. Davison, R. (2001) GSS and action research in the Hong Kong police force. Information Technology and People, 14, 60 77.
15. Davison, R.M. Martinsons, M.G. (2007) Action research and consulting: hellish partnership or heavenly marriage? In : Information Systems Action Research: An Applied View of Emerging Concepts and Methods, Kock, N.F. (ed pp. 377 394. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
16. Davison, R. Vogel, D. (2000) Group support systems in Hong Kong: an action research project. Information Systems Journal, 10, 3 20.
17. Davison, R., Martinsons, M. Kock, N. (2004) Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal, 14, 65 86.
18. van Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. Gustavsen, B. (1993) Action research and the generation of knowledge. Human Relations, 46, 1361 1365.
20. Habermas, J. (1981) The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press, London.
21. Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Heineman, London.
22. Hovorka, D., Germonprez, M. Larsen, K. (2003) Explanation in information systems. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments Systems and Organizations, 3, 169 187.
23. Hovorka, D., Germonprez, M. Larsen, K. (2008) Explanation in Information Systems. Information Systems Journal, 18, 23 43.
24. Iversen, J. Mathiassen, L. (2003) Cultivation and engineering of a software metrics program. Information Systems Journal, 13, 3 19.
25. Iversen, J., Mathiassen, L. Nielsen, P.A. (2004) Managing risks in software process improvement: an action research approach. MIS Quarterly, 28, 395 433.
26. Jepsen, L., Mathiassen, L. Nielsen, P.A. (1989) Back to thinking mode-diaries as a medium for effective management of information systems development. Behaviour and Information Technology, 8, 207 217.
27. Kinkaid, H. (1994) Assessing functional explanations in the social sciences. In : Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, Maratin, M. (ed.), pp. 341 354. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
28. Kock, N., McQueen, R. Scott, J. (1997) Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivistic sense? The contribution of an interpretive approach. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 1, 1 24.
29. Kohli, R. Kettinger, W. (2004) Informating the clan: controlling physicians' costs and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 28, 363 394.
30. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
31. Lau, F. (1997) A review on the use of action research in information systems studies. In : Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J. DeGross, J. (eds), pp. 31 68. Chapman and Hall, London.
32. Levin, M. (1993) Creating networks for rural economic development in Norway. Human Relations, 46, 193 218.
33. Lindgren, R., Stenmark, D. Ljungberg, J. (2003) Rethinking competence systems for knowledge-based organizations. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 18 29.
34. Majchrzak, A. (1997) Software to support socio-technical design: the case of TOP-integrator. In : Design of Computing Systems, Salvendy, G., Smith, M. Koubek, R. (eds), pp. 229 231. Elsevier, New York, NY, USA.
35. Majchrzak, A. Finley, L. (1995) A practical theory and tool for specifying socio-technical requirements to achieve organizational effectiveness. In : The Symbiosis of Work and Technology, Benders, J., de Haan, J. Bennett, D. (eds), pp. 95 116. Taylor and Francis, London.
36. Majchrzak, A. Gasser, L. (2000) TOP modeler. Information, Knowledge & Systems Management, 2, 95 110.
37. Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A. Gasser, L. (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly 26, 179 212.
38. Mason, J. (2004) Qualitative Researching. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
39. Mathiassen, L. (2002) Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People, 15, 321 345.
40. Mathiassen, L., Pries-Heje, J. Ngwenyama, O. (2002) Improving Software Organizations - From Principles to Practice. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
41. McKay, J. Marshall, P. (2001) The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology & People, 14, 46 59.
42. Mingers, J. (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12, 240 259.
43. Orlikowski, W. Baroudi, J. (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2, 1 62.
44. Rapoport, R. (1970) Three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23, 499 513.
45. Salmon, M. (1989) Explanation in the social sciences. In : Scientific Explanation; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Kitcher, P. Salmon, W. (eds), pp. 3 220. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
46. Simon, H. (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
47. Susman, G. Evered, R. (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582 603.
48. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G. Sawy, E.O. (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3, 36 59.
49. Wastell, D., Kawalek, P., Langmead-Jones, P. Ormerod, R. (2004) Information systems and partnership in multi-agency networks: an action research project in crime reduction. Information and Organization, 14, 189 210.
50. Webster, J. Watson, R. (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, xiii xxiii.