Control of translation initiation: A model-based analysis from limited experimental data

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 6, Issue 30, 2009, Pages 51-61

  Dimelow, Richard J ^a,b   Wilkinson, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b CYPROTEX DISCOVERY LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flux control; Parameter fitting; Translation initiation

Indexed keywords

CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; EXPERIMENTS; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES); YEAST;

BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; EXPERIMENTAL DATUMS; FLUX CONTROL; FLUX CONTROLS; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDES; IN VIVO MEASUREMENTS; INITIATION FACTORS; KEY SYSTEMS; KINETIC MODELS; MODEL-BASED; PARAMETER FITTING; PARAMETER SETS; PARAMETER VALUES; RANDOM SAMPLINGS; TRANSLATION INITIATION; UNCERTAIN PARAMETER SPACES; UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS;

RATE CONSTANTS;

GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTOR; INITIATION FACTOR 2; TRANSFER RNA;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; KINETICS; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; RANDOM SAMPLE; TRANSLATION INITIATION; YEAST;

EID: 57349131865     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0221     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen, J. K., Davey, H. M., Broadhurst, D., Heald, J. K., Rowland, J. J., Oliver, S. G. & Kell, D. B. 2003 High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 692-696. (doi:10.1038/nbt823)
2. Asano, K. & Sachs, M. S. 2008 Translation factor control of ribosome conformation during start codon selection. Genes Dev. 21, 1280-1287. (doi:10.1101/gad.1562707)
3. Met is an important translation initiation intermediate in vivo. Genes Dev. 14, 2534-2546. (doi:10.1101/gad.831800)
4. Basu, A. & Chowdhury, D. 2007 Traffic of interacting ribosomes: effects of single machine mechanochemistry on protein synthesis. Phys. Rev. E 75, 021 902. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.021902)
5. Campbell, S. G. & Ashe, M. P. 2006 Localization of the translational guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B. Cell Cycle 5, 678-680.
6. Campbell, S. G., Hoyle, N. P. & Ashe, M. P. 2005 Dynamic cycling of eIF2 through a large eIF2B-containing cytoplasmic body: implications for translational control. J. Cell Biol. 170, 925-934. (doi:10.1083/jcb.200503162)
7. Cornish-Bowden, A. 1995 Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. London, UK: Portland Press.
8. Di Ventura, B., Lemerle, C., Michalodimitrakis, K. & Serrano, L. 2006 From in vivo to in silico biology and back. Nature 443, 527-533. (doi:10.1038/nature05127)
9. French, S. L., Osheim, Y. N., Cioci, F., Nomura, M. & Beyer, A. L. 2003 In exponentially growing saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, RNA synthesis is determined by the summed RNA polymerase I loading rate rather than by the number of active genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1558-1568. (doi:10.1128/MCB.23.5.1558-1568.2003)
10. Futcher, B., Latter, G. I., Monardo, P., McLaughlin, C. S. & Garrels, J. I. 1999 A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7357-7368.
11. Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W. K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Sheah, E. K. & Weissman, J. S. 2003 Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741. (doi:10.1038/nature02046)
12. Gutenkunst, R. N., Waterfall, J. J., Casey, F. P., Brown, K. S., Myers, C. R. & Sethna, J. P. 2007 Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comp. Biol. 3, e189. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189)
13. Heinrich, R. & Rapoport, T. A. 1974 A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. Eur. J. Biochem. 42, 89-95. (doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03318.x)
14. Heinrich, R. & Rapoport, T. A. 1980 Mathematical modelling of translation of mRNA in eukaryotes; steady-states, time dependent processes and application to reticulocytes. J. Theor. Biol. 86, 279-313. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(80) 90008-9)
15. Jacques, N. & Dreyfus, M. 1990 Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: old and new questions. Mol. Micobiol. 4, 1063-1067. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00679.x)
16. Kholondenko, B. N. & Westerhoff, H. V. 1993 Metabolic channelling and control of the flux. FEBS Lett. 320, 71-74. (doi:10.1016/0014- 5793(93)81660-R)
17. Kuepfer, L., Peter, M., Sauer, U. & Stelling, J. 2007 Ensemble modelling for analysis of cell signalling dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1001-1006. (doi:10.1038/nbt1330)
18. Leach, A. R. 2001 Molecular modelling: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
19. Liebermeister, W. & Klipp, E. 2006 Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints. Theor. Biol. Med. Mod. 3, 41. (doi:10.1186/1742-4682-3-41)
20. Manchester, K. L. 2001 Catalysis of guanine-nucleotide exchange on eIF2 by eIF2B: can it be both a substituted enzyme and a sequential mechanism? Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 289, 643-646. (doi:10.1006/bbrc. 2001.6010)
21. McCarthy, J. 1998 Posttranscriptional control of gene expression in yeast. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 1492-1553.
22. Minton, A. P. 2006 How can biochemical reactions within cells differ from those in test tubes? J. Cell Sci. 119, 2863-2869. (doi:10.1242/jcs.03063)
23. Pavitt, G. D. 2005 eIF2B, a mediator of general and gene-specific translation control. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 1487-1492. (doi:10.1042/BST20051487)
24. Pavitt, G. D., Ramaiah, K. V. A., Kimball, S. R. & Hinnebusch, A. G. 1998 eIF2 independently binds two distinct eIF2B sub complexes that catalyze and regulate guanine-nucleotide exchange. Genes Dev. 12, 514-526. (doi:10.1101/gad.12.4.514)
25. Sangthong, P., Hughes, J. & McCarthy, J. E. G. 2007 Distributed control for recruitment, scanning and subunit joining steps of translation initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3573-3580. (doi:10.1093/nar/ gkm283)
26. Schlosshauer, M. & Baker, D. 2004 Realistic protein-protein association rates from a simple diffusional model neglecting long-range interactions, free energy barriers, and landscape ruggedness. Protein Sci. 13, 1660-1669. (doi:10.1110/ps.03517304)
27. Schmidt, H. & Jirstrand, M. 2006 Systems biology toolbox for MATLAB: a computational platform for research in systems biology. Bioinformatics 22, 514-515. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti799)
28. Sherman, F. 1991 Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194, 3-21.
29. Skjøndal-Bar, N. & Morris, D. R. 2007 Dynamics model of the process of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 361-393. (doi:10.1007/s11538-006-9128-2)
30. Sun, J. & Weinstein, H. 2007 Toward realistic modelling of dynamics processes in cell signalling: quantification of macromolecular crowding effects. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 155 105. (doi:10.1063/1.2789434)
31. Van Hoof, A., Lennertz, P. & Parker, R. 2000 Yeast exosome mutants accumulate 3′-extended polyadenylated forms of U4 small nuclear RNA and small nuclear RNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 441-452. (doi:10.1128/MCB.20.2.441-452.2000)
32. von der Haar, T. & McCarthy, J. E. G. 2002 Intracellular translation initiation factor levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their role in cap-complex function. Mol. Microbiol. 2, 531-544. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03172.x)
33. Welsh, G. I., Miyamoto, S., Price, N. T., Safer, B. & Proud, C. G. 1996 T-cell activation leads to rapid stimulation of translation initiation factor eIF2B and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11 410-11 413. (doi:10.1074/jbc.271.4.2121)
34. Wilkinson, S. J., Benson, N. & Kell, B. K. 2008 Proximate parameter tuning for biochemical networks with uncertain kinetic parameters. Mol. Biosyst. 4, 74-97. (doi:10.1039/b707506e)
35. Williams, H. P. 1993 Model building in mathematical programming. New York, NY: Wiley.
36. Zouridis, H. & Hatzimanikatis, V. 2007 A model for protein translation: polyzome self-organization leads to maximum protein synthesis rates. Biophys. J. 92, 717-730. (doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.087825)