Temporal and spatial allocation of motor preparation during a mixed-strategy game

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 2101-2108

  Mikulić, Areh ^a   Dorris, Michael C ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COGNITION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOVEMENT; SACCADES; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 57349087716     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90703.2008     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aumann RJ. What is Game Theory Trying to Accomplish? In: Frontiers of Economics, edited by Arrow K, Hankapohja S. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985, p. 28-78.
2. Barraclough DJ, Conroy ML, Lee D. Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game. Nat Neurosci 7: 404-410, 2004.
3. Camerer CF, Ho TH, Chong JK. Sophisticated experience-weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. J Econ Theory 104: 137-188, 2002.
4. Carpenter RH, Williams ML. Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377: 59-62, 1995.
5. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45: 801-814, 2005.
6. Coe B, Tomihara K, Matsuzawa M, Hikosaka O. Visual and anticipatory bias in three cortical eye fields of the monkey during an adaptive decision-making task. J Neurosci 22: 5081-5090, 2002.
7. Cohen MX, Ranganath C. Reinforcement learning signals predict future decisions. J Neurosci 27: 371-378, 2007.
8. Corrado GS, Sugrue LP, Seung HS, Newsome WT. Linear-Nonlinear- Poisson models of primate choice dynamics. J Exp Anal Behav 84: 581-617, 2005.
9. Ding L, Hikosaka O. Temporal development of asymmetric reward-induced bias in macaques. J Neurophysiol 97: 57-61, 2007.
10. Dorris MC, Glimcher PW. Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective desirability of action. Neuron 44: 365-378, 2004.
11. Dorris MC, Munoz DP. Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. J Neurosci 18: 7015-7026, 1998.
12. Dorris MC, Olivier E, Munoz DP. Competetive integration of visual and preparatory signals in the superior colliculus during saccadic programming. J Neurosci 27: 5053-5062, 2007.
13. Dorris MC, Pare M, Munoz DP. Neuronal activity in monkey superior colliculus related to the initiation of saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci 17: 8566-8579, 1997.
14. Dorris MC, Pare M, Munoz DP. Immediate neural plasticity shapes motor performance. J Neurosci 20: RC52, 2000.
15. Driver PM, Humphries DA. Protean Behaviour: The Biology of Unpredictability. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 1988.
16. Erev I, Roth AE. Predicting how people play games: reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Am Econ Rev 88: 848-881, 1998.
17. Fundenberg D, Tirole J. Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
18. Glimcher PW. The neurobiology of visual-saccadic decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 26: 133-179, 2003.
19. Godijn R, Theeuwes J. Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28: 1039-1054, 2002.
20. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature 404: 390-394, 2000.
21. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. The influence of behavioral context on the representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. J Neurosci 23: 632-651, 2003.
22. Hanes DP, Schall JD. Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science 274: 427-430, 1996.
23. Harsanyi JC. Equilibrium-point interpretation of stable sets and a proposed alternative definition. Manage Sci Ser A Theory 20: 1472-1495, 1974.
24. Ikeda T, Hikosaka O. Reward-dependent gain and bias of visual responses in primate superior colliculus. Neuron 39: 693-700, 2003.
25. Janssen P, Shadlen MN. A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nat Neurosci 8: 234-241, 2005.
26. Juan CH, Shorter-Jacobi SM, Schall JD. Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 15541-15544, 2004.
27. Lau B, Glimcher PW. Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 84: 555-579, 2005.
28. Lee D, Conroy ML, McGreevy BP, Barraclough DJ. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 22: 45-58, 2004.
29. Maimon G, Assad JA. A cognitive signal for the proactive timing of action in macaque LIP. Nat Neurosci 9: 948-955, 2006.
30. Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
31. Miller GF. Protean primates: the evolution of adaptive unpredictability in competition and courtship. In: Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations, edited by Whiten ABRW. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 1997, p. 312-340.
32. Milstein DM, Dorris MC. The influence of expected value on saccadic preparation. J Neurosci 27: 4810-4818, 2007.
33. Munoz DP, Dorris MC, Pare M, Everling S. On your mark, get set: brain stem circuitry underlying saccadic initiation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 78: 934-944, 2000.
34. Nash JF. Equilibrium points in N-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36: 48-49, 1950.
35. Palacios-Heurta I. Professionals play minimax. Rev Econ Stud 70: 395-415, 2003.
36. Platt ML, Glimcher PW. Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature 400: 233-238, 1999.
37. Rubinstein A. Comments on the interpretation of game theory. Econometrica 59: 909-924, 1991.
38. Schall JD. Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 33-42, 2001.
39. Schultz W. Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annu Rev Psychol 57: 87-115, 2006.
40. Seo H, Lee D. Temporal filtering of reward signals in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex during a mixed-strategy game. J Neurosci 27: 8366-8377, 2007.
41. Shadlen MN, Newsome WT. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 86: 1916-1936, 2001.
42. Shinar J, Forte I, Kantor B. Mixed strategy guidance: a new high-performance missle guidance law. J Guidance, Control Dynam 17: 129-135, 1994.
43. Smith JM. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
44. Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT. Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science 304: 1782-1787, 2004.
45. Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE. Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychol Sci 9: 379-385, 1998.
46. Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE, Zelinsky GJ. Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25: 1595-1608, 1999.
47. Thevarajah D, Dorris MC. Influence of previous choices and rewards on superior colliculus activity is modulated by behavioral context. Soc Neurosci Abstr 719.9, 2007.
48. Trappenberg TP, Dorris MC, Munoz DP, Klein RM. A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. J Cogn Neurosci 13: 256-271, 2001.
49. Usher M, McClelland JL. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108: 550-592, 2001.
50. Utts JM, Heckard RF. Mind on Statistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Thompson, 2007.
51. Walker M, Wooders J. Minmax play at Wimbledon. Am Econ Rev 91: 1521-1538, 2001.
52. Wilimzig C, Schneider S, Schoner G. The time course of saccadic decision making: dynamic field theory. Neural Netw 19: 1059-1074, 2006.
53. Wong K, Wang X. A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions. J Neurosci 26: 1314-1328, 2006.