The state-sponsored student entrepreneur

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 638-670

  Mars, Matthew M ^a   Slaughter, Sheila ^b   Rhoades, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57249115856     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.0.0024     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Altbach, P. (Ed.). (1981). Student politics: Perspectives from the eighties. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, Inc.
2. Baez, B., & Slaughter, S. (2001). Academic freedom and federal courts in the 1990s: The legitimation of the conservative entrepreneurial state. In J. Smart & W. Tierney (Eds.), Handbook of theory and research in higher education (pp. 73-118). Bronx, NY: Agathon Press.
3. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 175-188.
4. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bradshaw, T.K., Kennedy, K.M., Davis, P.R., Lloyd, L.L., Gwebu, N., & Last, J.A. (2003). Contributions of a university-industry toxic substances research and teaching program to economic development. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(3), 292-320.
7. Brint, S., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Levy, C.S. (2005). From liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 151-180.
8. Bygrave, W., & Minniti, M. (2000). The social dynamics of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 25-36.
9. Charney, A., & Libecap, G. (2003). The contribution of entrepreneurship education: An analysis of the Berger program. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(3), 276-288.
10. Creswell, J.W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Chianelli, R.R., Perez De la Rosa, M., Meitzner, G., Siadati, M., Berhault, G., Yacaman, M.J., Mehta, A., Pople, J., Fuentes, S., Alonzo, G., & Polette, L.A. (2005). Synchrotron and simulations techniques applied to problems in material sciences: Catalysts and azul Maya pigments. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, 12, 129-134.
12. Dees, J.G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (Eds.). (2001). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
13. Deli-Amen, R., & Rosenbaum, J.E. (2004). Charter building and labor market contacts in two-year colleges. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 245-265.
14. Delucchi, M. (1997). "Liberal arts" colleges and the myth of uniqueness. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(4), 414-426.
15. Drucker, P.F. (1993). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Business.
16. Eckel, P.D. (2003). Capitalizing on curriculum. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(1), 865-882.
17. Ehrensal, K.N. (2001). Training capitalism's foot soldiers: The hidden curriculum in undergraduate business programs. In E. Margolis (Ed.), The hidden curriculum in higher education (pp. 97-114). New York: Routledge.
18. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation (2007, January). Kauffman Campuses Inititative: The next generation of Kauffman Campuses. Retrieved January 29, 2007, from http://www.kauffman.org/items. cfm?itemID=475.
19. Feldman, M.P. (1994). The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly, 8(1), 67-76.
20. Feller, I. (1996). Technology transfer from universities. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon.
21. Geiger, R.L. (2004). Knowledge and money: Research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Gumport, P.J. & Pusser, B. (1995). A case of bureaucratic accretion: Context and consequences. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 493-520.
23. Jack, S.L., & Anderson, A.R. (1999). Entrepreneurship education within the entrerprise culture: Producing reflective practitioners. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 5(3), 11-115.
24. Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 283-300.
25. Kenney, M., & von Burg, U. (1999). Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: Industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 67-101.
26. Kirp, D.L. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Kranakis, E. (1989). Social determinants of engineering practice: A comparative view of France and America in the nineteenth century. Social Studies of Science, /9(1), 5-70.
28. Lee, J.J. & Rhoads, R.A. (2004). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 45(1). 739-760.
29. Leslie, L.L., & Brinkman, P.T. (1988). The economic value of higher education. Washington, DC: American Council of Education.
30. Libaers, D., Meyer, M., & Geuna, A. (2006). The role of university spinout companies in an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 443-450.
31. Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M.A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545-564.
32. Mangan, K.S. (2004). Entrepreneurs in every department: Using multimillion-dollar grants, 8 universities bring the 'can do' approach to subjects like, history, music, and nursing. The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 28, 2004.
33. Mars, M.M. (2006). The emerging domains of entrepreneurship education: Students, faculty, and the capitalist academy. PhD dissertation. University of Arizona.
34. Mars, M.M. (2007). The diverse agendas of faculty within an institutionalized model of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 10, 43-61.
35. Meyer, M. (2006). Academic inventiveness and entrepreneurship: On the importance of start-up companies in commercializing academic patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 501-510.
36. Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications, Inc.
37. Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (1999). The microfoundations of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 41-52.
38. Morphew, C., & Baker, B.D. (2004). The costs of prestige: Do research I universities incur higher administrative costs? The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 365-384.
39. National Center for Education Statistics (2008, April). Postsecondary institutions in the United States: Fall 2006 and degrees and other awards conferred: 2005-06. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/ pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007166
40. National Science Foundation (2007, February). Patents awarded to U.S. universities. Retrieved February 19, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/ statistics/seind93/chap5/doc/5e293.htm.
41. Nora, A., Cabrera, A., Hagedorn, L. S., & Pascarella, E. (1996). Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 427-451.
42. Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science. Higher Education, 49, 91-117.
43. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W.W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 99-114.
44. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
45. Perna, L.W. (2006). Studying college choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Springer Publishing.
46. Reams, B.D. (1986). University-industry research partnerships: The major legal issues in research and development agreements. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
47. Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany, N.Y.: State University Press.
48. Rhoades, G., & Rhoads, R.A. (2002). The public discourse of U.S. graduate employee unions: Social movement identities, ideologies, and strategies. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 163-186.
49. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1991). Professors, administrators, and patents: The negotiation of technology transfer. Sociology of Education, 64(2), 65-78.
50. Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(1), 3-28.
51. Rhoads, R.A. (1998). Freedom's web: Student activism in an age of cultural diversity. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
52. Rhoads, R.A., & Rhoades, G. (2005). Graduate employee unionization as symbol of and challenge to the corporatization of U.S. research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 243-275.
53. Safranski, S.R. (2004). The growth and advancement of entrepreneurship in higher education: An environmental scan/The contribution of entrepreneurship education: An analysis of the Berger Program/Impact of entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 340-342.
54. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
55. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
56. Slaughter, S., Campbell, T.I.D., Holleman, M., & Morgan, E. (2002). The "traffic" in graduate students: Students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(2), 282-312.
57. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
58. Slaughter. S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59. Soley, L.C. (1995). Leasing the ivory tower: The corporate takeover of academia. Boston: South End Press.
60. St. John, E. P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
61. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
62. University of Texas at El Paso (2006, July). Home page of Materials Corridor Partnership Initiative. Retrieved July 11, 2006, from http://research.utep.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=29069
63. Volk, C.S., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S.L. (2001). Models of institutional resource allocation: Mission, market, and gender. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(4), 387-413.
64. Washburn, J. (2005). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of higher education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.