The puzzle of free indirect discourse

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 353-395

  Sharvit, Yael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse; Free indirect discourse; Tense

Indexed keywords

EID: 57149135870     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-008-9039-9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. D. Abusch 1997 Sequence of tense and temporal de re Linguistics and Philosophy 20 1 50 10.1023/A:1005331423820
2. Altshuler, D. (2004). A simultaneous perception of things: SOT in Russian. Snippets 8.
3. Altshuler, D. (to appear). Narrative effects in Russian indirect reports and what they reveal about the meaning of the past tense. Proceedings of SALT 18.
4. Anand, P. (2006). De de se. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
5. Anand, P., & Nevins, A. (2004). Shifty operators in changing contexts. Proceedings of SALT XIV.
6. Banfield A. (1982) Unspeakable sentences. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
7. J. Bobaljik 2008 Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals Linguistic Review 25 203 230
8. Borer, H. (1981). Heybetim leSoniyim Sel ha-maba ha-meSulav (Linguistic aspects of the combined discourse). ha-Sifrut, 30-31, 35-57.
9. H.-N. Castañeda 1966 "He": A study in the logic of self-consciousness Ratio 7 130 157
10. Chierchia G. (1989) Anaphora and attitudes de se. In: Bartsch R., van Benthem J., van Emde Boas P. (eds) Semantics and contextual expression. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 1-31
11. Clements 1979 The logophoric pronun in Ewe: It's role in discourse Journal of West African Languages 10 141 177
12. Cooper, R. (1979). The interpretation of pronouns. In F. Heny & H. Schnelle (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (vol. 10, pp. 61-92).
13. M. Cresswell A. von Stechow 1982 belief generalized Linguistics andPhilosophy 5 503 535 10.1007/BF00355585
14. Doron, E. (1990). Point of view. CSLI/Stanford, Report No. CSLI-90-143.
15. Doron, E. (1991). Point of view as a factor of content. In S. Moore & A. Wyner (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 1 (pp. 51-64). Cornell University.
16. D. Dowty 1982 Tense, time adverbs and compositional semantic theory Linguistics and Philosophy 5 23 55 10.1007/BF00390692
17. M. Enç 1987 Anchoring conditions for tense Linguistic Inquiry 18 633 657
18. Heim, I. (1992). Anaphora and semantic interpretation: A reinterpretation of Reinhart's approach. University of Tuebingen, SfS Report 07-93.
19. Heim, I. (1994). Comments on Abusch's theory of tense. In H. Kamp (Ed.), Ellipsis, tense and questions, (pp. 143-170). DYANA deliverable R2.2.B, University of Amsterdam.
20. Heim, I. (2005). Features on bound pronouns. Ms., MIT.
21. Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Oxford
22. Jespersen, O. (1931). A modern English grammar on historical principles, Part IV, syntax, third volume, time and tense. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitatsbuchhandlung.
23. Kamp H., Reyle U. (1993) From discourse to logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht
24. Kamp H., Rohrer C. (1983) Tense in texts. In: Bäuerle R., Schwarze C., Stechow A. (eds) Meaning, use and interpretation of language. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 250-269
25. Kaplan D. (1977) Demonstratives. In Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford
26. D. Kaplan 1979 On the logic of demonstratives Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 81 98 10.1007/BF00258420
27. Kratzer, A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. Proceedings of SALT, VIII, CLC. Publications, Cornell University.
28. Kratzer, A. (to appear). Making a pronoun. Linguistic Inquiry.
29. D. Lewis 1979 Attitudes de dicto and de se The Philosophical Review 88 513 543
30. Ogihara T. (1996) Tense, attitudes and scope. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
31. B. Partee 1973 Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English The Journal of Philosophy 70 18 601 609 10.2307/2025024
32. Percus, O., & Sauerland, U.(2003). On the LFs of attitude reports. In M. Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7, pp. 228-242. Universität Konstanz.
33. Potts, C. (2007). The dimensions of quotation. In C. Barker & P. Jacobson (Eds.), Direct compositionality (pp. 405-431). Oxford University Press.
34. W.V.O. Quine 1956 Quantifiers and propositional attitudes The Journal of Philosophy 53 177 187
35. Reinhart, T. (1991). Self-representation. manuscript.
36. Schlenker, P. (1999). Propositional attitudes and indexicality. PhD dissertation, MIT.
37. P. Schlenker 2003 A plea for monsters Linguistics and Philosophy 26 29 120 10.1023/A:1022225203544
38. P. Schlenker 2004 Context of thought and context of utterance (a note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present) Mind & Language 19 279 304 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00259.x
39. Schlenker, P. (2005). Comments on Sharvit's "Embedded Pronouns". Handout of talk presented at Syntax and Semantics with Attitude, April 2005, USC.
40. Schlenker, P. (to appear). Indexicality and Logophoricity. In K. von Heusinger, P. Portner, & C. Maienborn (Eds.), Handbook of semantics.
41. Y. Sharvit 2003 Tense and identity in copular constructions. NaturalLanguageSemantics 11 363 393 10.1023/A:1025528225951
42. Y. Sharvit 2003 Embedded tense and universal grammar Linguistic Inquiry 34 669 681 10.1162/ling.2003.34.4.669
43. Sharvit, Y. (2004). Free indirect discourse and de re pronouns. In R. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14 (pp. 305-322). CLC Publications, Cornell University.
44. von Fintel, K. (1994). Restrictions on quantifier domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA Publications.
45. von Stechow, A. (1995). On the proper treatment of tense. Proceedings of SALT 6.
46. von Stechow, A. (2003). Feature deletion under semantic binding: Tense, person, and mood under verbal quantifiers. Text of the NELS33 talk.
47. Zimmermann, E. (1991). Kontextabhängigkeit. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik: ein internationals Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung.