Context of thought and context of utterance: A note on free indirect discourse and the historical present

Mind and Language

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 279-304

  Schlenker, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542585463     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00259.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abusch, D. 1997: Sequence of tense and temporal De Re'. Linguistics & Philosophy, 20 1-50
2. Abusch, D. 1998: Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Banfield, A. 1982: Unspeakable Sentences (Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Banfield, A. 1998: The name of the subject: the "il"? Yale French Studies, 93, The Place of Maurice Blanchot, 133-174
5. Cooper, R. 1983: Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.
6. Doron, E. 1991: Point of view as a factor of content In S. Moore and A.Z. Wyner (eds), Proceedings of SALT 1. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publication.
7. Geurts, B. 1999: Presuppositions and Pronouns. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier.
8. Heim, I. 1991: Class notes on 'The First Person', manuscript, MIT.
9. Heim, I. and Kratzer, A. 1998: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10. st, 2002.
11. Kaplan, D. 1969: Quantifying in. In D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine. Dordrecht: Reidel.
12. Kaplan, D. 1977: Demonstratives. In Almog/Perry/Wettstein, Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, 1989
13. Kaplan, D. 1989: Afterthoughts. In Almog/Perry/Wettstein, Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press, 1989
14. Kratzer, A. 1998: More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In D. Strolovirch and A. Lawson (eds), Proceedings of SALT VIII. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications
15. Levinson, S. 1983: Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Partee, B. 1973: Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 601-609.
17. Predelli, S. 1998: Utterance, interpretation and the logic of indexicals. Mind & Language, 13, 400-414.
18. Quine, W. V. 1956: Quantifiers and prepositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 53, pp. 177-187.
19. Recanati, F. 2000: Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
20. Reinhart, T. 1983: Point of view in language - the use of parentheticals. In Gisa Rauh (ed.) Essays on Deixis. Tübinger: Gunter Narr Verlag.
21. Ron, M. 1981: Free indirect discourse, mimetic language games, and the subject of fiction. Poetics Today, 2, 17-39.
22. Schlenker, P. 2003: A plea for monsters. Linguistics & Philosophy, 26, 29-120.
23. Schlenker, P. (to appear, a): Logophoricity, indexicality, and plural pronouns. Papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
24. Schlenker, P. (to appear, b): Sens et contexte. In S. Bourgeois-Gironde (ed.), Les Formes de l'Indexicalité. Presses de la Rue d'Ulm.
25. Stalnaker, R. 1999: Context and Content. Oxford: Clarendon Press.