Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals

Linguistic Review

Volumn 25, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 203-230

  Bobaljik, Jonathan David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949100221     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TLIR.2008.005     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bulgarian source
3. Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meier, Carol Padden and Wendy Sandler (2004). Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), 19-39. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Benveniste, Emile (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
5. Blansitt, Edward L. (1975). Progressive aspect. Working Papers on Language Universals 18: 1-35.
6. Boas, Franz (1911). Introduction. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, Franz Boas (ed.), 1-83. Washington, D.C: Bureau of American Ethnology,.
7. [Reprinted in Preston Holder (ed.) (1991). Introduction to Handbook of American Indian Languages, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.]
8. Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Cinque, Guglielmo (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Conklin, Harold C. (1962). Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In Problems in Lexicography, Fred W. Householder and Sol Saporta (eds.), 119-142. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Comrie, Bernard (1980). Review of Universals of Human Language, vol III: Word Structure, J.H. Greenberg (ed.), Language 56 (4): 834-838.
12. Corbett, Greville G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. _ (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Croft, William (2003). Typology and Universals [Second Edition]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cysouw, Michael (2003). The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Elson, Ben (1960). Sierra Popoluca Morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 26 (3): 206-223.
17. Filimonova, Elena (ed.) (2005). Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of the Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Fillmore, Charles J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin.
19. Foley, William A. (1986). The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Forchheimer, Paul (1953). The Category of Person in Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
21. Fransen, Margo A. E. (1995). A grammar of Limbum, a Grassfields Bantu language spoken in the north-west province of Cameroon. Ph.D. Dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.
22. Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23. Gonzalez, Andrew B. (1981) Pampangan: Towards a Meaning-Based Description. Canberra: Australian National University.
24. Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73-113. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. _ (1988). The first person inclusive dual as an ambiguous category. Studies in Language 12 (1): 1-18.
26. _ (1989). On a metalanguage for pronominal systems: A reply to McGregor. Studies in Language 13 (2): 452-458.
27. _ (1993). The second person is rightly so called. In Principles and Prediction: The analysis of Natural Language, Mushira Eid and Gregory Iverson (eds.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28. Halle, Morris (1997). Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers at the Interface, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30, Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang and Martha McGinnis (eds.), 425-449. Cambridge: MIT Press.
29. Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter (2002). Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482-526.
30. Heim, Irene (in press). Uninterpretable features on bound variable pronouns. In Phi Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules, David Adger, Susana Béjar and Daniel Harbour (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
31. Hewitt, B. George and Zaira K. Khiba (1979). Abkhaz. Amsterdam: North Holland.
32. Ingram, David (1978). Typology and universals of personal pronouns. In Universals of Human Language, vol. III: Word Structure, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 213-248. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
33. Julien, Marit (2002). Syntactic Heads and Word Formation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Kratzer, Angelika (2006). Minimal pronouns: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of bound variable pronouns. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
35. Levinson, Steven C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds.), 161-227. Oxford: Polity Press.
36. Lillo-Martin, Diane and Edward S. Klima (1990). Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, vol. 1: Linguistics, Susan D. Fischer and Patricia Siple (eds.), 191-210. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
37. Lyons, John (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. _ (1977). Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Marantz, Alec (1982). Re Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 483-545.
40. McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince (1996): Prosodic morphology 1986. In Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 32.
41. McGinnis, Martha (2005). On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 81 (3): 699-718.
42. McGregor, William B. (1989). Greenberg on the first person inclusive dual: Evidence from some Australian languages. Studies in Language 13 (2) : 437-458.
43. Meier, Richard P. (1990). Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, vol. 1: Linguistics, Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), 175-190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Milne, Leslie (1921). An Elementary Palaung Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45. Moravcsik, Edith A. (1995). Summing up Suffixaufnahme. In Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.), 451-484, New York: Oxford University Press.
46. _ (2003). A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27 (3): 469-503.
47. Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré (1990). Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Constructions of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan and Robert G. Lee (2000). The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
49. Nelson, Nicole (2003). Asymmetric anchoring. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University.
50. Nevins, Andrew (2007). The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (2): 273-313.
51. Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2005). Possible and Probable Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. _ (2008). Universals in syntax. The Linguistic Review 25: 35-82 [this issue].
53. Noyer, Rolf (1997). Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York: Garland Press.
54. Plank, Frans (1985). Die Ordnung der Personen. Folia Linguistica 19: 111-176.
55. Rice, Keren (2000). Morpheme Order and Semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan Verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Rubino, Carl (2000). Ilocano Dictionary and Grammar: Ilocano-English, English-Ilocano. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
57. _ (2005). Iloko. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Nikolaus Himmelmann and K.A. Adelaar (eds.), 326-349. London: Curzon Press.
58. Sandler, Wendy and Diane Lillo-Martin (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Sauerland, Uli (2004). A comprehensive semantics for agreement. Handout of a paper presented at Workshop on Phi Features. McGill University.
60. Sauerland, Uli (in press). On the semantic markedness of Φ-features. In Phi theory: Phi Features Across Interfaces and Modules, David Adger, Susana Béjar and Daniel Harbour (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Schlenker, Philippe (1999). Propositional attitudes and indexicality: A cross-categorical approach. Ph. D. Dissertation, MIT.
62. Siewierska, Anna (2004). Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Silverstein, Michael (1976). Feature hierarchies and Ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Richard M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
64. Simon, Horst J. (2005). Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second person plural. In Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of the Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction, Elena Filimonova (ed.), 113-150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65. Sokolovskaja, N. K. (1980). Nekotorye semantičeskie universalii v sisteme ličnyx mestoimenij. In Teorija i tipologija mestoimenij, I. F. Vardul' (ed.) 84-102. Moscow: Nauka.
66. Thomas, David (1955). Three analyses of the Ilocano pronoun system. Word 11 (2): 204-208.
67. Tomioka, Satoshi (2006). Plural indexicals in Japanese (and beyond). Paper presented at ZAS Berlin.
68. Turla, Ernesto C. (1999). Classic Kapampangan Dictionary. Aloha, OR: Lazerquick.
69. Zwicky, Arnold (1977). Hierarchies of Person. In Chicago Linguistics Society 13: 714-733. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.