Assessing nanofiltration fouling in drinking water treatment using fluorescence fingerprinting and LC-OCD analyses

Water Science and Technology: Water Supply

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 459-465

  Peiris, B R H ^a   Halle C ^a   Haberkamp, Jens ^b   Legge, R L ^a   Peldszus, S ^a   Moresoli, C ^a   Budman, H ^a   Amy, G ^c   Jekel, Martin ^b   Huck, P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNESCO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Drinking water treatment; Flourescence spectroscopy; LC OCD; Membrane foulants; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMOLECULES; BIOPOLYMERS; CARBOHYDRATES; FLUORESCENCE; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; LIGHT EMISSION; LUMINESCENCE; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ORGANIC ACIDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; POLYMERS; POLYSACCHARIDES; POTABLE WATER; PROTEINS; WATER FILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

COMPLEX MIXTURES; DRINKING WATER TREATMENT; DRINKING WATER TREATMENTS; DRINKING WATERS; FLOURESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE FINGERPRINTING; FOULANTS; FOULING CONTROLS; HUMIC AND FULVIC ACIDS; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; INNOVATIVE APPROACHES; INSTRUMENTAL SENSITIVITIES; LC-OCD; MEMBRANE FOULANTS; MINIMAL SAMPLES; MOLECULAR SIZES; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; ONLINE MONITORING; ORGANIC MEMBRANES;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

CARBOHYDRATE; DRINKING WATER; FULVIC ACID; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER; ORGANIC CARBON; PROTEIN; RIVER WATER;

DRINKING WATER; FILTRATION; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE; ORGANIC MATTER; WATER TREATMENT;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOFOULING; CONTROL STRATEGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FOULING CONTROL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MOLECULAR SIZE; NANOFILTRATION; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 57149096052     PISSN: 16069749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2008.095     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Croué, J. 2004 Isolation of humic and non-humic NOM fractions: structural characterizations. Environ. Monit. Assess. 92(1-3), 193-207.
2. Gray, S. R., Ritchie, C. B., Tran, T. & Bolto, B. A. 2007 Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performance. Water Res. 41(17), 3833-3841.
3. Her, N., Amy, G., McKnight, D., Sohn, J. & Yoon, Y. 2003 Characterization of DOM as a function of MW by fluorescence EEM and HPLC-SEC using UVA, DOC, and fluorescence detection. Water Res. 37(17), 4295-4303.
4. Her, N., Amy, G., Sohn, J. & Gunten, U. 2008 UV absorbance ratio index with size exclusion chromatography (URI-SEC) as an NOM property indicator. J. Water Supply Res. Technol.-AQUA 57.1, 35-44.
5. Huber, S. A. & Frimmel, F. H. 1992 A liquid chromatographic system with multi-detection for the direct analysis of hydrophilic organic compounds in natural waters. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 342(1-2), 198-200.
6. Lee, N., Amy, G. & Croué0, J. 2006 Low-pressure membrane (MF/ UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. Water Res. 40(12), 2357-2368.
7. Sierra, M. M. D., Giovanela, M., Parlanti, E. & Soriano-Sierra, E. J. 2005 Fluorescence fingerprint of fulvic and humic acids from varied origins as viewed by single-scan and excitation/emission matrix techniques. Chemosphere 58(6), 715-733.
8. Smeulders, D. E., Wilson, M. A., Patney, H. & Armstrong, L. 2000 Structure of molecular weight fractions of Bayer humic substances. 2. Pyrolysis behavior of high-temperature products. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39(10), 3631-3639.
9. Standard Methods 2005 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21. American Public Health/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA.
10. Wilson, M. A., Ellis, A. V., Lee, G. S. H., Rose, H. R., Lu, X. & Young, B. R. 1999 Structure of molecular weight fractions of Bayer humic substances. 1. Low-temperature products. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38(12), 4663-4674.