Wildlife managers and public involvement: Letting the crazy aunt out

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 277-290

  Mortenson, Kristin G ^a   Krannich, Richard S ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Human Dimensions; Public Involvement; Wildlife Management; Wildlife Managers

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745603642     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/108712001753473957     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker, S. V., & Fritsch, J. A. (1997). New territory for deer management: Human conflicts on the suburban frontier. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(2), 404-407.
2. Curtis, P. D., & Hauber, J. R. (1997). Public involvement in deer management decisions: Consensus versus consent. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(2), 399-403.
3. Daniels, S. E., Walker, G. B., Carroll, M. S., & Blatner, K. A. (1996). Using collaborative learning in fire recovery planning. Journal of Forestry, August, 4-9.
4. Decker, D. J., & Chase, L. C. (1997). Human dimensions of living with wildlife-A management challenge for the 21st Century. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(4), 788-795.
5. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
6. Duda, M. D. (1992). Responsive management: Finding the right tool for the job. Transactions of the 57th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 57, 141-147.
7. Enck, J. W., & Brown, T. L. (1996). Citizen participation approaches for successful beaver management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(3), 78-79.
8. Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy debate: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26, 165-187.
9. Gasson, W., & White, J. (1993). Comprehensive management through teamwork in the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Transactions of the 58th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conferences, 58, 221-228.
10. Gigliotti, L. M., & Decker, D. J. (1992). Human dimensions in wildlife management education: Pre-service opportunities and in-service needs. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20, 8-14.
11. Gill, R. B. (1996). The wildlife professional subculture: The case of the crazy aunt. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7(1), 60-69.
12. Jacobson, S. K., & McDuff, M. D. (1998). Training idiot savants: The lack of human dimensions in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 72(2), 263-276.
13. Johnson, K. N., Johnson, R. L., Edwards, D. E., & Wheaton, C. A. (1993). Public participation in wildlife management: Opinions from public meetings and random surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 218-225.
14. Kellert, S. R. (1995). Managing for biological and sociological diversity, or “deja-vu, aU over again.” Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23(2), 274-278.
15. Kennedy, J. J., Dombeck, M. P., & Koch, N. E. (1998). Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the western world at the close of the Twentieth Century. Unasylva, 49(1), 16-26.
16. Kilpatrick, H. J., & Walter, W. D. (1997). Urban deer management: A community vote. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(2), 388-391.
17. Krannich, R. S., & Teel, T. (1999). Utah residents’ views about selected wildlife management issues: Similarities and differences across five stakeholder categories. Logan, UT: Institute for Social Science Research on Natural Resources, Utah State University.
18. Lawrence, R. L., Daniels, S. E., & Stankey, G. H. (1997). Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision-making. Society and Natural Resources, 70, 577-589.
19. Manring, N. J. (1995). Science, politics, and professionalism: Challenges for resource professionals. Journal of Natural Resources Life Science Education, 24, 136-143.
20. McClaran, M. P., & King, D. A. (1998). Procedural fairness, personal benefits, agency expertise, and planning participants’.support for the Forest Service. School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson. Unpublished manuscript.
21. McMullin, Steve L. (1993). Characteristics and strategies of effective state fish and wildlife agencies. Transactions of the 58th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 58, 206-210.
22. Moote, M. A., & McClaran, M. P. (1997). Viewpoint: Implications of participatory democracy for public land planning. Journal of Range Management, 50, 473-481.
23. Mortenson, K. G., & Krannich, R. S. (2000). Wildlife management and the Utah public: Managers’ attitudes, beliefs, and ideas within the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Logan, UT: Institute for Social Science Research on Natural Resources, Utah State University.
24. Stout, R. J., Decker, D. J., Knuth, B. A., Proud, J. C., & Nelson, D. H. (1996). Comparison of three public-involvement approaches for stakeholder input into deer management decisions: A case study. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24(2), 312-317.
25. Van de Wetering, S. (1997). Enlightened self-interest: Wyoming experiments with coordinated resource management. Chronicle of Community, 1(2), 17-25.
26. Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. B. (1996). The Clinton Administration, the Northwest Forest Conference and managing conflict: When talk and structure collide. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 77-91.