Two different types of ring-like enhancement on dynamic MR imaging in breast cancer: Correlation with the histopathologic findings

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1435-1443

  Kobayashi, Miki ^a   Kawashima, Hiroko ^a   Matsui, Osamu ^a   Zen, Yoh ^b   Suzuki, Masayuki ^a   Inokuchi, Masafumi ^a   Noguchi, Masakuni ^b   Ohta, Tetsuo ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Delayed rim enhancement; Dynamic MR imaging; Early peripheral enhancement; Lymphangiogenesis; Ring like enhancement

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGENESIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST NECROSIS; CELL INVASION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LYMPH VESSEL; LYMPHANGIOGENESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASTITIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROMA; TUMOR GROWTH; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 57049170321     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21622     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:199-204.
2. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989;170:681-686.
3. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000;217:841-848.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485-493.
5. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:965-974.
6. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:35-43.
7. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110.
8. Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:104-112.
9. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:421-430.
10. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996;200:639-649.
11. Hachiya J, Seki T, Okada M, Nitatori T, Korenaga T, Furuya Y. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Radiat Med 1991;9:232-240.
12. Rubens D, Totterman S, Chacko AK, et al. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:267-270.
13. Mussurakis S, Gibbs P, Horsman A. Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumours: quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:35-46.
14. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238:42-53.
15. Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H, et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 1997;205:209-213.
16. Kuwada T, Tozaki M, Harada J. [Evaluation of enhancement patterns using three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 209 cases of breast cancer.] Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 2004;64:544-551.
17. Teifke A, Behr O, Schmidt M, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of breast lesions: correlation with microvessel distribution pattern and histologic characteristics of prognosis. Radiology 2006;239:351-360.
18. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis - correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1-8.
19. Gasparini G, Harris AL. Clinical importance of the determination of tumor angiogenesis in breast carcinoma: much more than a new prognostic tool. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:765-782.
20. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:260-266.
21. Locopo N, Fanelli M, Gasparini G. Clinical significance of angiogenic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998;52:159-173.
22. Agarwal B, Saxena R, Morimiya A, Mehrotra S, Badve S. Lymphangiogenesis does not occur in breast cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1449-1455.
23. Choi WW, Lewis MM, Lawson D, et al. Angiogenic and lymphangiogenic microvessel density in breast carcinoma: correlation with clinicopathologic parameters and VEGF-family gene expression. Mod Pathol 2005;18:143-152.
24. Vleugel MM, Bos R, van der Groep P, et al. Lack of lymphangiogenesis during breast carcinogenesis. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:746-751.
25. Sarli G, Sassi F, Brunetti B, Rizzo A, Diracca L, Benazzi C. Lymphatic vessels assessment in feline mammary tumours. BMC Cancer 2007;7:7.
26. Seki T. [Dynamic MRI for breast tumors.] Jpn J Magn Reson Med 1990;10:314-325.
27. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995;196:115-122.
28. Revel D, Brasch RC, Paajanen H, et al. Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and tissue differentiation in MR imaging of experimental breast carcinoma. Radiology 1986;158:319-323.
29. Kusama R, Takayama F, Tsuchiya S. MRI of the breast: comparison of MRI signals and histological characteristics of the same slices. Med Mol Morphol 2005;38:204-215.
30. Kawashima H. [Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: radiologic-pathologic correlation.] Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1996;56:459-469.
31. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Ishida N, Hirano T, Ishihara A, Takeda K. Contrast-enhanced high-resolution MRI of invasive breast cancer: correlation with histopathologic subtypes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1805-1809.