Contrast-enhanced high-resolution MRI of invasive breast cancer: Correlation with histopathologic subtypes

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 183, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1805-1809

  Kitagawa, Kakuya ^a   Sakuma, Hajime ^a   Ishida, Nanaka ^a   Hirano, Tadanori ^b   Ishihara, Akinori ^c   Takeda, Kan ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Matsusaka Central Hospital   (Japan)

^c Matsusaka Central Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER REGRESSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 16644377482     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831805     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995;196:115-122
2. Brown J, Buckley D, Coulthard A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study-UK MRI Breast Screening Study Advisory Group. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:765-776
3. Liu PF, Debatin JF, Caduff RF, Kacl G, Garzoli E, Krestin GP. Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. Br J Radiol 1998;71:501-509
4. Malich A, Boehm T, Facius M, et al. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection. Clin Radiol 2001;56:278-283
5. Solomon B, Orel S, Reynolds C, Schnall M. Delayed development of enhancement in fat necrosis after breast conservation therapy: a potential pitfall of MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1998;170:966-968
6. Turetschek K, Huber S, Floyd E, et al. MR imaging characterization of microvessels in experimental breast tumors by using a particulate contrast agent with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2001;218:562-569
7. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 2003;76:3-12
8. Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer, 14th ed. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara, 2000:19-56
9. Page DL, Anderson TJ. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. New York, NY: Churchhill Livingstone, 1987:193-197
10. Sakamoto G. Histological classification of breast cancer [in Japanese]. Gan No Rinsho 1985; [suppl]:105-113
11. Kurosumi M, Tabei T, Inoue K, et al. Prognostic significance of scoring system based on histological heterogeneity of invasive ductal carcinoma for node-negative breast cancer patients. Oncol Rep 2003;10:833-837
12. Tsutsui S, Ohno S, Murakami S, Kataoka A, Kinoshita J, Hachitanda Y. Histological classification of invasive ductal carcinoma and the biological parameters in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2003;10:149-152
13. Samejima N, Yamazaki K. A study on the vascular proliferation in tissues around the tumor in breast cancer. Jpn J Surg 1988;18:235-242
14. Kobayashi S, Iwase H, Ito Y, et al. Clinical significance of bcl-2 gene expression in human breast cancer tissues. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;42:173-181
15. Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H. Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 1999;210:233-240
16. Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W. Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med 2003;26:172-181
17. Kodama H. Reevaluation of the histological classification of breast cancer: a presentation of a new histological classification considering the relationship between scirrhous tendency and postoperative prognosis [in Japanese]. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1985;86:853-862
18. Park IA, Ham EK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions: histologic subtype in false-negative cases. Acta Cytol 1997;41:1131-1138
19. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:421-430
20. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, Satoh T, Tokunaga O, Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000;217:841-848
21. Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H, et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 1997;205:209-213