No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 213-227

  Fox, Julia R ^a   Koloen, Glory ^a   Sahin, Volkan ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548069053     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838150701304621     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Armour, T. (2005, April 24). It's a dirty job... Chicago Tribune, sec. 7, p. 18.
2. Baker, W., & Dessart, G. (1998). Down the tube: An inside account of the failure of American television. New York: Basic Books.
3. Ball-Rokeach, S. (1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society, 1(1/2), 5-40.
4. Baum, M. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91-109.
5. Baum, M. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20, 173-190.
6. Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. (2006). "The Dally Show" effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341-367.
7. Benoit, W. L., & Currie, H. (2001). Inaccuracies in media coverage of the 1996 and 2000 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38(1), 28-39.
8. Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(8), 1394-1414.
9. Broh, C. A. (1980). Horse-race journalism: Reporting the polls In the 1976 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 515-549.
10. Broh, C. A. (1983). Presidential preference polls and network news. In W. C. Adams (Ed.), Television coverage of the 1980 presidential campaign (pp. 29-48). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
11. Chaffee, S. (2001). Studying the new communication of politics. Political Communication, 18, 237-244.
12. Chaffee, S., & Cho, S. (1980). Time of decision and media use during the Ford-Carter campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 53-69.
13. Clancey, M., & Robinson, M. J. (1985). General election coverage: Part I. In M. Robinson & A. Ranney (Eds.), The mass media in campaign '84: Articles from Public Opinion magazine (pp. 27-33). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
14. Comedy Central's "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" honored with four TCA awards nominations. (2003, June 5). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://press.comedycentral.com/press/pressreleases/release.jhtml?f=6- 05-03_The_Daily_TCA_Awards_Nominations.xml
15. Cook, J. (2004, November 24). CBS' Rather to sign off as news anchor. Chicago Tribune, sec. 1, pp. 1, 14.
16. "The Daily Show's"Jon Stewart wins prestigious TCA award. (2005, July 25). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://press.comedycentral.com/press/pressreleases/release.jhtml?f= 07_25_05_tca_awardthe_daily_show.xml
17. Davies, D. (Host). (2005, July 22). Fresh Air [Radio broadcast]. Philadelphia, PA: WHYY.
18. Dearin, R. D. (1997). The American dream as depicted In Robert J. Dole's 1996 presidential nomination acceptance speech. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27(1), 698-711.
19. DeFleur, M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989). Theories of mass communication (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman, Inc.
20. Despite uncertain outcome campaign 2000 highly rated. (2000). Washington, DC. Retrieved July 30, 2001, from Election turnout in 2004 was highest since 1968. (2005, January 16). Hoosier Times, p. A6.
21. Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2003). The nightly news nightmare: Network television's coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2000. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
22. Fleischer, M. (2004, November 3), Youth turnout up sharply in 2004 [Press release]. Washington, DC: The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement.
23. Fox, J. R. (2003). The alarm function of mass media: A critical study of "The plot against America," a special edition of NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw. In N. Chitty, R. Rush, & M. Semati (Eds.), Studies in terrorism: Media scholarship and the enigma of terror (pp. 55-71). Penang, Malaysia: Southbound (in association with the Journal of International Communication).
24. Fox, J. R., Angelini, J. R., & Goble, C. (2005). Hype versus substance In network television coverage of presidential election campaigns. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(1), 97-109.
25. Fox, J. R., & Park, B. (2006). The "I" of embedded reporting: An analysis of CNN coverage of the "Shock and Awe" campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 36-51.
26. Fox, J. R., Park, B., & Lang, A. (2006, June). Complicated emotional messages produce liberal bias: Effects of valence and complexity on sensitivity and criterion. Top paper presented to the Information Systems Division at the International Communication Association annual conference, Dresden, Germany.
27. Gilbert, M. (2004, December 30). Pop culture swung wildly left, right In election year. Chicago Tribune, sec. 2, p. 2.
28. Graber, D. A. (1976). Press and TV as opinion resources In presidential campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 285-303.
29. Graber, D. A. (1980). Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
30. Graber, D. A. (1993). Mass media and American politics (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
31. Hofstetter, C. R. (1981). Content analysis. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 529-560). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Hollander, B. (1995). The new news and the 1992 presidential campaign: Perceived vs. actual political knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(4), 786-798.
33. Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz, C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 25-42). New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc.
34. Jamieson, K. H., Johnston, R., Hagen, M. G., Waldman, P., & Kenski, K. (2000). The public learned about Bush and Core from conventions; half ready to make an informed choice. Philadelphia: Annenberg Pubic Policy Center.
35. Johnson, S. (2004, November 28). The future of network news: Follow the money. Chicago Tribune, sec. 7, pp. 1, 8-9.
36. The Jon Stewart and undecided voter connection. (2004, September 20). New York: Fox News Network. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from
37. Just, M., Crigler, A., & Wallach, L. (1990). Thirty seconds or thirty minutes: What viewers learn from spot advertisements and candidate debates. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 120-133.
38. Kraus, S. (Ed.). (1979). The great debates: Carter v. Ford, 1976. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
39. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70.
40. Lang, A. (2006a). Motivated cognition (LC4MP): The influence of appetitive and aversive activation on the processing of video games. In P. Messarsis & L. Humphries (Eds.), Digital Media: Transformation in human communication (pp. 237-254). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
41. Lang, A. (2006b). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(Suppl.), S57-S81.
42. Lang, A., Sparks, J. V., Bradley, S. D., Lee, S., & Wang, Z. (2004). Processing arousing Information: Psychophysiological predictors of motivated attention. Psychophysiology, 47(Suppl. 1), S61.
43. Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1961). Ordeal by debate: Viewer reactions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 277-288.
44. Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37-51). New York: Harper and Row.
45. Lazaroff, L. (2004, November 24). Audience decline an old story. Chicago Tribune, sec. 3, pp. 1, 8.
46. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
47. Lethbridge, R., Simmons, J., & Allen, N. (2002). All things unpleasant are not equal: Startle reflex modification while processing social and physical threat. Psychophysiology, 39(Suppl. 1), S51.
48. Lichter, S. R., Amundson, D., & Noyes, R. (1988). The video campaign: Network coverage of the 1988 primaries. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and the Center for Media and Public Affairs.
49. Lichter, S. R., & Lichter, L. S. (1996). Campaign '96 final: How TV news covered the general election. Media Monitor. Washington, DC: Center for Media and Public Affairs. Retrieved February 8, 1997, from
50. Lippmann, W. (1921). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan Company.
51. Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. L. (1983). Milestones in mass communication research. New York: Longman.
52. McDonald, D., & Fredin, E. (2001, May). Primitive emotional contagion in coviewing. Paper presented to the Information Systems Division at the International Communication Association 51st annual conference, Washington, DC.
53. McKain, A. (2005). Not necessarily not the news: Gatekeeping, remediation, and The Daily Show. The Journal of American Culture, 28(4), 415-430.
54. McRae, K., Taitano, E., Kaszniak, A., & Lane, R. (2004). Differential skin conductance response to biologically and non-biologically relevant IAPS stimuli at brief exposure durations before a backward mask. Psychophysiology, 47(Suppl. 1), S60.
55. Mendelsohn, H., & O'Keefe, G. (1975). The people choose a president: Influences on voter decision making. New York: Praeger Publishers.
56. Middleton, R. (1962). National TV debates and presidential voting decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 426-429.
57. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1995). Public opinion and rationality. In T. Glasser & C. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 33-54). New York: The Guilford Press.
58. Patterson, T. E. (1977). The 1976 horserace. The Wilson Quarterly, 1, 73-79.
59. Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. New York: Praeger Publishers.
60. Patterson, T. E., & McClure, R. D. (1976). The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics. New York: Paragon Books.
61. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2002, June 9). Public's news habits little changed by September 11. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 15, 2002, from http://people-press.org
62. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2004a, January 11). Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political universe: Perceptions of partisan bias seen as growing. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 22, 2004, from http:\\people-press.org
63. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2004b, June 8). Online news audience larger, more diverse. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved July 31, 2006, from http:\\people-press.org
64. Price, V., & Roberts, D. (1987). Public opinion processes. In C. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.) Handbook of communication science (pp. 781-816). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Ranney, A. (Ed.). (1979). The past and future of presidential debates. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
66. Reber, B. H., & Benoit, W. L. (2001). Presidential debate stories accentuate the negative, Newspaper Research Journal, 22(3), 30-43.
67. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
68. Ryan, M. (2005, April 8). Good decision: Putting "indecision" on DVD. Chicago Tribune, sec. 2, p. 2.
69. Salant, R. S., (1962). The television debates: A revolution that deserves a future, Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 335-350.
70. Scheele, H. Z. (1984). Ronald Reagan's 1980 Acceptance Address: A focus on American values. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48(1), 51-61.
71. Schudson, M. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Sears, D. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (3), 515-530.
73. Sesno, F. (2001). Let's cover the conventions. The Harvard International Journal of Press/ Politics, 6(1), 11-15.
74. Stewart's 'stoned slackers"? Not quite. (2004, September 28). Atlanta, GA: CNN.com. Retrieved September 28, 2004, from wysiwyg://1/http:// cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/28/tv.stewart.oreilly.ap/index.html
75. Trent, J. S., & Friedenberg, R. V. (2004). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
76. Under-30 voters top 20 million. (2004, November 6). The Herald-Times, p. A5.
77. Williams, B., & Edy, J. (1999). Basic beliefs, democratic theory, and public opinion. In C. Glynn, S. Herbst, G. O'Keefe, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Public Opinion (pp. 212-245). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
78. Willis, E. F. (1962). Little TV debates in Michigan. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 48, 15-23.
79. Wright, C. (1974). The nature and functions of mass communication. In J. Civikly (Ed.), Messages; A reader on human communication (pp. 241-250). New York: Random House. (Reprinted from Mass communication: A sociological perspective, pp. 11-23, by C. Wright, Ed., 1959, New York: Random House)
80. Young America's news source: Jon Stewart. (2004, March 2). CNN.com. Retrieved March 3, 2004, from wysiwyg://1//http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHO. ..2/apontv.stewarts.stature.ap/index.html