Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: The early stages

Constraints in Phonological Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 158-203

  Hayes, Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053888353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486418.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Aksu-Koç, A. A. and D. I. Slobin (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In D. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: the Data. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Albright, A. and B. Hayes (1998). An automated learner for phonology and morphology. MS., Department of Linguistics, UCLA. [http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/learning]
3. Albro, D. (1997). Evaluation, implementation, and extension of Primitive Optimality Theory. M.A. thesis, UCLA. [http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/grads/albro/papers.html]
4. Algeo, J. (1978). What consonant clusters are possible? Word 29. 206–224.
5. Baker, W. J. and B. L. Derwing (1982). Response coincidence analysis as evidence for language acquisition strategies. Applied Psycholinguistics 3. 193–221.
6. Beckman, J. (1998). Positional Faithfulness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts. [ROA 234, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
7. Benua, L. (1997). Transderivational Identity: Phonological Relations Between Words. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts. [ROA 259, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
8. Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177.
9. Berman, R. A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In D. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: the Data. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bernhardt, B. H. and J. P. Stemberger (1998). Handbook of Phonological Development from the Perspective of Constraint-Based Nonlinear Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
11. Best, C. T., G.W. McRoberts, and N. M. Sithole (1988). Examination of the perceptual re-organization for speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14. 345–360.
12. Boersma, P. (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 21. 43–58.
13. Boersma, P. (1998). Functional Phonology. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
14. Boersma, P. (2000). Learning a grammar in Functional Phonology. In Dekkers et al. (2000). 465–523.
15. Boersma, P. and B. Hayes (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. LI 32. 45–86.
16. Burzio, L. (1998). Multiple correspondence. Lingua 103. 79–109.
17. Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. In J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz (eds.) The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
18. Chomsky, N. and M. Halle (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. JL 1. 97–138.
19. Dekkers, J., F. van der Leeuw, and J. van de Weijer (eds.) (2000). Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Derwing, B. L. and W. J. Baker (1986). Assessing morphological development. In P. Fletcher and M. Garman (eds.) Language Acquisition: Studies in First Language Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Dinnsen, D. A., L.W. McGarrity, K. O’Connor, and K. Swanson (2000). On the role of sympathy in acquisition. Language Acquisition 8. 321–361.
22. Eimas, P. D., E. R. Siqueland, P. Jusczyk, and J. Vigorito (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science 171. 303–306.
23. Eisner, J. (1997). Efficient generation in primitive Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid. [ROA 259, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
24. Ellison, M. (1994). Phonological derivation in Optimality Theory. In COLING, Vol. 2. 1007–1013, Kyoto. [ROA 75, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
25. Fikkert, P. (1994). On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. Leiden and Amsterdam: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
26. Fodor, J. A., T. G. Bever, and M. F. Garrett (1974). The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw Hill.
27. Friederici, A. D. and J. E. Wessels (1993). Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 54. 287–295.
28. Gerken, L. (1994). Child phonology: past research, present questions, future directions. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
29. Gomez, R. L. and L. Gerken (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70. 109–135.
30. Guenther, F. H. and M. N. Gjaja (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. JASA 100. 1111–1121.
31. Hale, M. and C. Reiss (1998). Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. LI 29. 656–683.
32. Hayes, B. (1986). Assimilation as spreading in Toba Batak. LI 17. 467–499.
33. Hayes, B. (1999a). Phonetically-driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and Inductive Grounding. In M. Darnell, E. Moravscik, M. Noonan, F. Newmeyer, and K. Wheatly (eds.) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. 1: General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 243–285.
34. Hayes, B. (1999b). Phonological restructuring in Yidi and its theoretical consequences. In B. Hermans and M. Oostendorp (eds.) (1999). The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 175–205.
35. Hermans and M. Oostendorp (eds.) (1999c). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. [ROA 327, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
36. Hermans and M. Oostendorp (eds.) (2000). Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. In Dekkers et al. (2000). 88–120.
37. Jun, S.-A. (1996). The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. New York: Garland.
38. Jusczyk, P. W. and R. N. Aslin (1995). Infants’ detection of sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology 29. 1–23.
39. Jusczyk, P. W., A. Cutler, and N. J. Redanz (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64. 675–687.
40. Jusczyk, P. W., A. D. Friederici, J. M. I. Wessels, V. Y. Svenkerud, and A. Jusczyk (1993). Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language 32. 402–420.
41. Jusczyk, P.W. and E. A. Hohne (1997). Infants’ memory for spoken words. Science 277. 1984–1986.
42. Jusczyk, P. W., P. A. Luce, and J. Charles-Luce (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33. 630–645.
43. Kager, R. (1999a). Surface opacity of metrical structure in Optimality Theory. In B. Hermans and M. Oostendorp (eds.) The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 207–245.
44. Kager, R. (1999b). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Kazazis, K. (1969). Possible evidence for (near-)underlying forms in the speech of a child. CLS 5. 382–388.
46. Keating, P. A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Lg 60. 286–319.
47. Keating, P., W. Linker, and M. Huffman (1983). Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops. Journal of Phonetics 11. 277–290.
48. Kenstowicz, M. (1998). Uniform Exponence: exemplification and extension. [ROA 218, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
49. Kiparsky, P. (1988). Phonological change. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey, Vol. 1: Linguistic Theory: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 363–415.
50. Kiparsky, P. and L. Menn (1977). On the acquisition of phonology. In J. Macnamara (ed.) Language Learning and Thought. New York: Academic Press.
51. Kirchner, R. (1997). Contrastiveness and Faithfulness. Phonology 14. 83–113.
52. Kisseberth, C. (1970). On the functional unity of phonological rules. LI 1. 291–306.
53. Koutsoudas, A., G. Sanders, and C. Noll (1974). The application of phonological rules. Lg 50. 1–28.
54. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics 50. 90–107.
55. Kuhl, P. K. (1995). Mechanisms of developmental change in speech and language. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Vol. 2. 132–139.
56. Kuhl, P. K. and J. D. Miller (1975). Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced–voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science 190. 69–72.
57. Kuhl, P. K. and J. D. Miller (1978). Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. JASA 63. 905–917.
58. Kuhl, P. K. and D. M. Padden (1982). Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques. Perception and Psychophysics 32. 542–550.
59. Kuhl, P. K. and D. M. Padden (1983). Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. JASA 73. 1003–1010.
60. Levelt, C. C. (1994). On the Acquisition of Place. Leiden and Amsterdam: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
61. Lombardi, L. (1995). Laryngeal neutralization and syllable well-formedness. NLLT 13. 39–74.
62. Macken, M. (1980). The child’s lexical representation: the puzzle-puddle-pickle evidence. JL 16. 1–17.
63. McCarthy, J. (1998). Morpheme structure constraints and paradigm occultation. CLS 34, Vol. 2: The Panels.
64. McHugh, B. (1986). Cyclicity in phrasal phonology: evidence from Chaga. WCCFL 5. 154–164.
65. Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetics, and phonological capabilities. In B. Butterworth (ed.) Language Production, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press. 3–47.
66. Ohala, J. J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In P. F. MacNeilage (ed.) The Production of Speech. New York: Springer. 189–216.
67. Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition 6: 3. 201–253.
68. Pater, J. (this volume). Bridging the gap between receptive and productive development with minimally violable constraints.
69. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. MS., available from http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/publicationsreports.html.
70. Prince, A. and B. Tesar (1999). Learning phonotactic distributions. [ROA 353, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
71. Pulleyblank, D. and W. J. Turkel (2000). Learning phonology: genetic algorithms and
72. Yoruba tongue root harmony. In Dekkers et al. (2000). 554–591.
73. Smith, N. (1973). The Acquisition of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Smolensky, P. (1993). Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. [ROA 87, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
75. Smolensky, P. (1996a). On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. LI 27. 720–731.
76. Smolensky, P. (1996b). The initial state and ‘Richness of the Base’ in Optimality Theory. [ROA 154, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
77. Steriade, D. (1997). Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/steriade/papers/phoneticsinphology.pdf.
78. Steriade, D. (2000). Paradigm Uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In J. Pierrehumbert and M. Broe (eds.) Acquisition and the Lexicon: Papers in Laboratory Phonology V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 313–334.
79. Tesar, B. (1995a). Computational Optimality Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado. [ROA 90, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
80. Tesar, B. (1995b). Computing optimal forms in Optimality Theory: basic syllabification. [ROA 52, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
81. Tesar, B. (1999). Robust interpretive parsing in metrical stress theory. WCCFL 7. 625–639. [ROA 262, http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html]
82. Tesar, B. and P. Smolensky (1993). The learnability of Optimality Theory: an algorithm and some basic complexity results. [ROA 2, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
83. Tesar, B. and P. Smolensky (1996). Learnability in Optimality Theory. [ROA 156, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
84. Tesar, B. and P. Smolensky (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. LI 29. 229–268.
85. Tesar, B. and P. Smolensky (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
86. Vance, T. (1987). ‘Canadian Raising’ in some dialects of the Northern United States. American Speech 62. 195–210.
87. Vihman, M. (1996). Phonological Development: the Origins of Language in the Child, Oxford: Blackwell.
88. Walther, M. (1996). OT SIMPLE – a construction kit approach to Optimality Theory implementation. [ROA 152, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
89. Werker, J. F. and C. E. Lalonde (1988). Cross-language speech perception: initial capabilities and development change. Developmental Psychology 24. 672–683.
90. Werker, J. F. and R. C. Tees (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7. 49–63.
91. Westbury, J. R. and P. Keating (1986). On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. JL 22. 145–166.
92. Wilson, C. (2001). Learning phonotactic distributions with targeted constraints. Paper presented at the 6th Southwest Workshop on Optimality Theory, Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.
93. Zoll, C. (1998). Positional asymmetries and licensing. MS., MIT. [ROA 282, http://roa.rutgers.edu]
94. Zuraw, K. (2000). Patterned Exceptions in Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. [http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/zuraw/dnld pprs/diss.pdf]