Recent advances in scenario-based training for medical education

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 784-789

  Cannon Bowers, Janis A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Medical education and training; Scenario based training; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MILITARY MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SIMULATION; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TRAINING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; TEACHING;

EID: 56849115138     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283184435     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Ziv A, Shaul B-D, Ziv M. Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors. Med Teach 2005; 27:193-199.
2. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Med Educ 2006; 40:792-797.
3. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27:10-28.
4. Stout RJ, Bowers CA, Nicholson DM. Guidelines for using simulations to train higher level cognitive and teamwork skills. In: Schmarrow D, Conn J, Nicholson DM, editors. Handbook of virtual environments for training and education: developments for the military and beyond. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Greenwood Publishing Group (in press). This chapter summarizes many years of research into SBT and provides specific guidelines for developing effective SBT.
5. Glaser R. Expertise in learning: how do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structure? In: Klahr D, Kotosfky D, editors. Complex information processing: the impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989. pp. 269-282.
6. Chi MTH, Glaser R, Farr MJ, editors. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates; 1988.
7. Gobet F, Simon HA. Recall of random and distorted positions: implications for the theory of expertise. Mem Cogn 1996; 24:493-503.
8. Logan GD. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev 1988; 95:492-527.
9. DeGroot A. Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton; 1965.
10. Egan DE, Schwartz BJ. Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Mem Cogn 1979; 7:149-158.
11. Lesgold A. Toward a theory of curriculum for use in designing intelligent instructional systems. In: Mandl H, Lesgold A, editors. Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems. New York, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1988. pp. 114-137.
12. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
13. Kolb DA, Boyatzis RE, Mainemelis C. Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In: Sternberg RJ, Zhang L, editors. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. The educational psychology series. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. pp. 227-247.
14. Gredler ME. Learning and instruction: theory into practice. 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall; 2005.
15. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. Design training systems systematically. In: Locke EA, editor. Principles of organizational behavior: a handbook. London: Blackwell; 2000. pp. 43-59.
16. Cannon-Bowers J, Burns J, Salas E, Pruitt J. Advanced technology in scenario-based training. Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998. pp. 365-374.
17. Annett J, Stanton N. Task analysis. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 21. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Publishing; 2006. pp. 45-78.
18. Cianciolo A, Matthew C, Sternberg R, Wagner R. Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise: the Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 613-632.
19. Fowlkes J, Dwyer D, Oser R, Salas E. Event-based approach to training (EBAT). Int J Aviat Psychol 1998; 8:209-221.
20. Ironside P. Using narrative pedagogy: learning and practising interpretive thinking. J Adv Nurs 2006; 55:478-486.
21. Witmer BG, Singer MJ. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1998; 7:225-240.
22. Singer MJ, Howey AM. Enhancing virtual environments to support training. In: Schmarrow D, Cohn J, Nicholson DM, editors. Handbook of virtual environments for training and education: developments for the military and beyond. Portsmouth, New Hamphire: Greenwood Publishing Group (in press).
23. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007; 2:115-125. This article reviews methods of debriefing as a mode of feedback in simulation-based training.