Effect of inverting electrode on mismatch negativity presence for perceptible/imperceptible tonal frequency contrasts

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 708-714

  Walker Black, Letitia ^a   Stuart, Andrew ^b  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evoked potentials; Inverting electrode; Mismatch negativity; Montage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HUMAN; MASTOID; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE APEX; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTOID; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 56749161795     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020802283241     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alho, K. 1995. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hear, 16, 38-51.
2. American National Standards Institute. 1996. Specifications for Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: ANSI.
3. American National Standards Institute. 1999. Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. (ANSI S3.1-1999). New York: ANSI.
4. Bertrand, O., Perrin, F. & Pernier, J. 1985. A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysio, 62, 462-64.
5. Ceponiene, R., Yaguchi, K., Shestakova, A., Alku, P., Suominen, K., et al. 2002. Sound complexity and 'speechness' effects on pre-attentive auditory discrimination in children. Int J Psychophysio, 43, 199-211.
6. Dalebout, S.D. & Fox, L.G. 2000. Identification of the mismatch negativity in the responses of individual listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 12-22.
7. Dalebout, S.D. & Stack, B. 1999. Mismatch negativity to acoustic differences not differentiated behaviorally. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 388-99.
8. Gomes, H., Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Kurtzberg, D., Brattson, A., et al. 2000. Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task. Psychophysiology, 37, 807-16.
9. Hall, III J.W. 1992. Handbook of Auditory-evoked Potentials. Needham Heights, MA: Bacon & Allyn.
10. Jääskeläinen, I.P., Hautamäki, M., Näätänen, R. & Ilmonieme, R.J. 1999. Temporal span of human echoic memory and mismatch negativity: Revisited. NeuroReport, 10, 1305-1308.
11. Jasper, H.H. 1958. The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysio, 10, 371-73.
12. Keith, R.W. 1995. Development and standardization of SCAN-A: Test of auditory processing disorders in adolescents and adults. J Amer Acad Audiol, 6, 286-92.
13. Kraus, N. 1999. Speech sound perception, neurophysiology and plasticity. Int J Ped ORL, 47, 123-29.
14. Lang, A.H., Eerola, O., Korpilahti, P., Holopainen, I., Salo, S., et al. 1995. Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear, 16, 118-30.
15. Levitt, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Amer, 49, 467-77.
16. McGee, T., Kraus, N. & Nicol, T. 1997. Is it really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysio, 11, 359-68.
17. McPherson, D.L. 1996. Late Potentials of the Auditory System. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
18. McPherson, D.L. & Starr, A. 1993. Auditory evoked potentials in the clinic. In A.M. Halliday (ed.), Evoked potentials in clinical testing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, pp. 359-81.
19. Näätänen, R. 2003. Mismatch negativity: Clinical research and possible applications. Int J Psychophysiol, 48, 179-88.
20. Näätänen, R. 1992. Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W.K. & Mantysalo, S. 1978. Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psycho, 42, 313-29.
22. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K. & Sams, M. 1987. Interstimulus interval and the mismatch negativity. In C. Barber & T. Blum (eds.) Evoked Potentials II. London: Butterworths, pp. 392-397.
23. Nuñez, P.L. 1981. Electric Fields of the Brain. London: Oxford University Press.
24. Picton, T.W. & Hillyard, S.A. 1974. Human auditory evoked potentials. II: Effects of attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysio, 36, 191-99.
25. Polich, J., Aung, M. & Dalessio, D.J. 1988. Long latency auditory evoked potentials: Intensity, inter-stimulus interval, and habituation. Pavlov J Biosoc Sci, 23, 35-40.
26. Ponton, C., Don, M., Eggermont, J. & Kwong, B. 1997. Integrated mismatch negativity (MMNi): A noise free representation of evoked responses allowing single point distribution-free statistical tests. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysio, 104, 381-82.
27. Roup, C.M., Wiley, T.L., Safady, S.H. & Stoppenbach, D.T. 1998. Tympanometric screening norms for adults. Amer J Audiol, 7, 1-6.
28. Schröger, E. 1998. Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp, 30, 131-45.
29. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Sinkkonen, J. & Tervaniemi, M. 2000. Towards optimal recording and analysis of the mismatch negativity. Audiol Neuro-Otol, 5, 235-46.
31. Squires, K.C. & Hecox, K.E. 1983. Electrophysiological evaluation of higher level auditory processing. Sem Hear, 4, 415-33.
32. Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K. & Näätänen, R. 1985. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 62, 437-48.
33. Tervaniemi, M., Schroger, E., Saher, M. & Näätänen, R. 2000. Effects of spectral complexity and sound duration on automatic complex-sound pitch processing in humans: A mismatch negativity study. Neurosci Lett, 290, 66-70.
34. Tervaniemi, M., Lehtokoski, A., Sinkkonen, J., Virtanen, J., Ilmoniemi, R., et al. 1999. Test-retest replicability of mismatch negativity (MMN) for duration, frequency, and intensity changes. Clin Neurophysiol, 110, 1388-1393.
35. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K. & Näätänen, R. 1994. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90-92.
36. Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C. & Otis, B. 2001. Central auditory plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech sound training. Ear Hear, 22, 79-90.
37. Walker, L.J., Downs, C.R., Carpenter, M., Cranford, J.L., Stuart, A., et al. 2001. Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artifacts associated with recording the mismatch negativity response. J Amer Acad Audiol, 12, 348-356.
38. Wier, C.C., Jesteadt, W. & Green, D.M. 1977. Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. J Acoust Soc Amer, 61, 178-84.