Integrated mismatch negativity (MMN(i)): A noise-free representation of evoked responses allowing single-point distribution-free statistical tests

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 143-150

  Ponton, Curtis W ^a   Don, Manuel ^a   Eggermont, Jos J ^b   Kwong, Betty ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acoustically different (deviant) stimulus; Mismatch negativity) (MMN); Negative component; Single (standard) auditory stimulus; Statistical evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICS;

EID: 0031106104     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)96104-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Creutzfeldt, O.D., Watanabe, S. and Lux, H.D. Relations between EEG phenomena and potentials of single cortical cells. I. Evoked responses after thalamic and epicortical stimulation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1966a, 20: 1-18.
2. Creutzfeldt, O.D., Watanabe, S. and Lux, H.D. Relations between EEG phenomena and potentials of single cortical cells. I. Spontaneous and convulsive activity. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1966b, 20: 19-37.
3. Edgington, E.S. Randomization Tests. Decker, New York, 1995.
4. Eggermont J.J. and Smith, G.W. Synchrony between single-unit activity and local field potentials in relation to periodicity coding in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 1995, 73: 227-245.
5. Grinvald, A., Frostig, R.D., Lieke, E. and Hildesheim, R. Optical imaging of neural activity. Physiol. Rev., 1988, 68: 1285-1366.
6. Guthrie, D. and Buchwald, J.S. Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiol., 1991, 28: 240-244.
7. Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T. and Sharma, A. Neurophysiologic basis of speech discrimination. Ear Hear., 1995, 16: 19-37.
8. Näätänen, R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear., 1995, 16: 6-18.
9. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W.K. and Mäntysalo, S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Act. Psychol., 1978, 42: 313-329.
10. Näätänen, R., Schröger, E., Karakas, S., Tervaniemi, M. and Paavilainen, P. Development of a memory trace for complex sounds in the human brain. NeuroReport, 1989, 4: 503-506.
11. Näätänen, R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav. Brain Sci., 1990, 13: 201-288.
12. Pekkonen, E. Jousmaki, V., Partanen, J. and Karhu, J. Mismatch negativity and age-related auditory memory. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 321-325.
13. Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K. and Näätänen, R. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 63: 437-448.
14. Shannon, R.V., Adams, D.D., Ferrel, R.L., Palumbo, R.L. and Grandgenett, M. A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1990, 88: 905-907.