DESPERATELY SEEKING SYSTEMS THINKING IN THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS DISCIPLINE

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 757-770

  Alter, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

body of knowledge for information systems; Sysperanto; systems analysis; Systems thinking; work system; work system principles

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS THINKING;

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE; BODY OF KNOWLEDGE FOR INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DISCIPLINES; SYSPERANTO; SYSTEM INFORMATION; SYSTEM THINKINGS; SYSTEMS PRINCIPLES; WORK SYSTEM; WORK SYSTEM PRINCIPLE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 85138697634     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Abran, A., Moore, J. W., Bourque, P., Dupuis, R., and Tripp, L. L. (Eds.). Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge: Trial Version (Version 1.00), 2001 (available online at www.swebok.org; accessed August 14, 2003).
2. Alter, S. “Architecture of Sysperanto—A Model-Based Ontology of the IS Field,” accepted for publication by the Communications of the AIS, 2004a.
3. Alter, S. “18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace the IT Artifact as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field,” Communications of the AIS (12:23), 2003, pp. 365-394.
4. Alter, S. “Making Work System Principles Visible and Usable in Systems Analysis and Design,” in Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, E. Stohr and C. Bullen (Eds.), New York, 2004b, pp. 1604-1611.
5. Alter, S. “The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information System Research,” Communications of the AIS (9:6), 2002, pp. 90-104.
6. Banville, C., and Landry, M. “Can the Field of MIS be Disciplined?,” Communications of the ACM, (32:1), 1989, pp. 48-60.
7. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. “The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), June 2003, pp. 183-194.
8. Bostrom, R. P., and Heinen, J. S. “MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. PART I: The Causes,” MIS Quarterly (1:3), December 1977, pp. 17-32.
9. Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G. J., and Nunamaker, Jr., J. F. “Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems,” Journal of Management Information Systems (19:4), Spring 2003, pp. 31-63.
10. Brown, C. V., and Vessey, I. “NIBCO’s Big Bang,” Communications of the AIS (5:1), January 2001.
11. Brynjolfsson, E. “The IT Productivity Gap,” Optimize Magazine, Issue 21, July 2003 (available online at http://www. optimizemag.com/issue/021/roi.htm; accessed April 25, 2004).
12. Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 1999.
13. Cherns, A. “Principles of Socio-Technical Design,” Human Relations (2:9), 1976, pp. 783-792.
14. Churchman, C. W. The Systems Approach, Dell Publishing, New York, 1979.
15. nd ed.), Goodyear Publishing Company, Santa Monica, CA, 1979.
16. Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. “Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the IS Discipline,” Journal of the AIS (4:5), October 2003, pp. 237-293.
17. Kling, R., and Scacchi, W. “The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization,” Advances in Computing (21), 1982, pp. 1-90.
18. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., and Larsen, K. R. T. “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present and Future,” Communications of the AIS (12:50), 2003, pp. 752-780.
19. Majchrzak, A., and Borys, B. “Generating Testable Socio-Technical Systems Theory,” Journal of Engineering Technology and Management (18:3-4), 2001, pp. 219-240.
20. Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., and Gasser, L. “A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Processes,” MIS Quarterly (26:3), 2003, pp. 179-212
21. Mitchell, V. L., and Zmud, R. W. “The Effects of Coupling IT and Work Process Strategy in Redesign Projects,” Organization Science (10:4), 1999, pp. 424-438.
22. Mumford, E., and Weir, M. Computer Systems in Work Design—The ETHICS Method, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979.
23. Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. “Studying IT in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research (2:1), 1991, pp.1-28.
24. Orlikowski, W. J., and Iacono, C. S. “Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact,” Information Systems Research (12:2), June 2001, pp. 121-134.
25. Paré, G. “Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Study Research,” Communications of the AIS (13:18), 2004, pp. 233-364.
26. Pasmore, W. A. “Social Science Transformer: The Socio-Technical Perspective,” Human Relations (48:1), January 1985, pp. 1-22
27. Petrie, D. E. Understanding the Impact of Technological Discontinuities on Information Systems Management: The Case of Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Claremont Graduate University, 2004.
28. Ramiller, N. “Animating the Concept of Business Process in the Core Course in Information Systems,” Journal of Informatics Education and Research (3:2), 2002, pp. 53-71 (available online at http://iaim.aisnet.org/jier/V3N2/).
29. Senge, P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday/Currency, New York, 1990.
30. Standish Group. CHAOS Chronicles, 2004, cited by softwaremag.com, “Standish Project Success Rates Improved Over 10 Years,” January 15, 2004 (available online at http://www.softwaremag.com/L.cfm?Doc=newsletter/2004-01-15/Standish; accessed September 7, 2004).
31. Sterman, J. D. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000.
32. Stewart, C. “Influences on Systems Thinking,” posting on ISWorld, August 21, 2003 (viewed at http://www.commerce. uq.edu.au/isworld/research/msg.21-08-2003.html).
33. Sumner, M., and Ryan, T. “The Impact of CASE: Can it Achieve Critical Success Factors?,” Journal of Systems Management (45:6), 1994, pp 16ff.
34. Trist, E. “The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program” in Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior, A. Van de Ven and W. Joyce (Eds.), Wiley Interscience, New York, 1981.
35. Wolstenholme, E. F. “A Core Set of Archetypal Structures in Systems Dynamics,” Systems Dynamics Review (19:1), 2003, pp. 7-26.