Ethical review of undergraduate student research in the NHS: Evolution of the system could benefit us all

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Wilkinson, Mark ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; ETHICAL REVIEW; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 56749091912     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.025338     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Hunter D. Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system. Med Ethics 2007;33:651-4.
2. Beales IL. Ethics review in research: role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely. BMJ 2004;328:710.
3. Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Ethics review roulette: what can we learn. BMJ 2004;328:121-2.
4. Constant policing of our research makes us look sinister, say scientists, The Times, 25 October 2007. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/ article2733452.ece (accessed 10 Dec 2007).
5. Oakeshott P, Yadava R. Research governance: major barrier to medical student research. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:139-40.
6. Soteriou T, Hek G. Research governance and students: what are NHS trusts looking for? Nurse Res 2003;11:22-31.
7. Whelan K, Thomas JE, madden AM. Student research projects: the experiences of student dietitians, university faculty members, and collaborators. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:1567-74.
8. Tan SP. My disappointment with an ethics committee. BMJ 2004;329:807.
9. NHS. National Patient Safety Agency. NRES. Standard operating procedures for research ethics committees. http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/news- andpublications/publications/standard-operatingprocedures/ (accessed April 2008).
10. Doyal L. The ethical governance and regulation of student projects: a draft proposal. Bull Med Ethics 2004;203:8-11.
11. Heitman E, Olsen CH, Anestidou L, et al. New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 2007;82:838-45.
12. Powell ST, Allison MA, Kalichman MW. Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study. Sci Eng Ethics 2007;13:249-64.
13. Plemmons DK, Brody SA, Kalichman MW. Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Sci Eng Ethics 2006;12:571-82.
14. Tinker A, Coomber V. University research ethics committees: their role, remit and conduct. 2004. King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/02/96/45/UniversityResearchEthicsCommittee. pdf (accessed March 2008).
15. Human Tissue Authority. Research FAQs. http://www.hta.gov.uk/ about_hta/faqs/research_faqs.cfm (accessed March 2008).