Ethics review in research: Role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely

BMJ

Volumn 328, Issue 7441, 2004, Pages 710-

  Beales, Ian L P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 1642344463     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.710-b     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Hearnshaw H. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. BMJ 2004; 328: 140–1. (17 January.)
2. Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ 2004; 328: 121–2. (17 January.)