External feedback in general practice: A focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 142-147

  McKay, John ^a,b   Pope, Lindsey ^a   Bowie, Paul ^a   Lough, Murray ^a  

^a NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audit; Evaluation; Feedback; Peer review; Significant event analyses

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SKILL; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEEDBACK; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; PEER GROUP; SCOTLAND;

EID: 60349129270     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00969.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Grol, R. Lawrence, M. (1995) A model for peer review and audit. In Quality Improvement by Peer Review (eds R. Grol M. Lawrence pp. 3 10. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
2. Helfer, R. (1972) Peer evaluation: its potential usefulness in medical education. British Journal of Medical Education, 6, 224 231.
3. Grol, R., van Eijk, J., Mesker, F. Schellevis, F. (1985) Audit: a project on peer review in general practice. Family Practice, 2, 219 224.
4. Southgate, L., Cox, J., David, T, et al. (2001) The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's performance procedures. Medical Education, 35 (s1 2 8.
5. Scottish Executive, NHS Education for Scotland, RCGP (Scotland) and BMA (Scotland 2003) GP Appraisal: A Brief Guide. Edinburgh : Scottish Executive.
6. Department of Health (2006) New GMS Contract 2006/7. London : Stationery Office.
7. Royal College of General Practitioners (1983) The Quality Initiative. London : RCGP.
8. Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice (1992) Assessment Working Party, Interim Report. London : JCPTGP.
9. McKay, J., Bowie, P. Lough, J. R. M. (2003) Evaluating significant event analyses: implementing change is a measure of success. Education for Primary Care, 14, 34 38.
10. McKay, J., Bowie, P. Lough, J. R. M. (2006) Variation in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a 5-year study of assessment by peer review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 622 629.
11. Bowie, P., Cooke, S., Lo, P., McKay, J. Lough, M. (2007) The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13 (2 352 357.
12. McMillan, R. Cameron, N. (2006) Factors influencing the submission of videotaped consultations by general practitioners for peer review and educational feedback. Quality in Primary Care, 14 (2 85 89.
13. McKay, J., Murphy, D., Bowie, P., Schmuck, M.-L., Lough, M. Eva, K. W. (2007) Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16, 150 153.
14. Donaldson, L. (2006) Good Doctors, Safer Patients. A report by the Chief Medical Officer. London : The Stationary Office.
15. Eva, K. W. Regehr, G. (2005) Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80 (Suppl. s46 54.
16. Regehr, G. Eva, K. W. (2006) Self-assessment, self-direction, and the self regulating professional. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 449, 34 38.
17. Bowie, P., McKay, J., Dalgetty, E. Lough, J. R. M. (2005) A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 185 189.
18. Bowie, P., McCoy, S., McKay, J. Lough, M. (2005) Learning issues raised by the peer review of significant event analyses in general practice. Quality in Primary Care, 13 (2 75 84.
19. General Medical Council (2006) Good Medical Practice. London : General Medical Council.
20. Streiner, D. L. Norman, G. R. (2003) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 3rd edn. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
21. Lough, J. R. M. (2003) The development of integrated audit for the training of general practitioners. MD Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
22. Rennie, D. (2003) editorial peer review. In Peer Review in Health Sciences, 2nd edn (eds. F. Godlee & T. Jefferson), pp. 1 14. London : BMJ Publishing Group.
23. Norcini, J. J. (2007) Workplace-based assessment in clinical training. Association for the Study of Medical Education, p. 19.
24. Norcini, J. J. (2003) Peer assessment of competence. Medical Education, 37 (6 539 543.
25. Woods, D. F. (2007) Formative Assessment. Edinburgh : Association for the Study of Medical Education.
26. Nicol, D. J. McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199 218.
27. Norman, G. R., Shannon. S. Marrin, M. L. (2004) The need for needs assessment in continuing medical education. British Medical Journal, 328, 999 1001.
28. Davidoff, F. (2004) Improving peer review: who's responsible? Medical Education, 328, 657 658.
29. Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : PTR Prentice Hall.
30. Schroter, S., Black. N., Evans. S., Carpenter. J., Godlee, F. Smith. R. (2004) Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised control trial. British Medical Journal, 328, 673 675.
31. Jamtvedt, G., Young, J. M., Kristoffersen, D. T., O'Brien, M. A. Oxman, A. D. (2006) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2.