Transformation of SBVR business design to UML models

Proceedings of the 2008 1st India Software Engineering Conference, ISEC'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 29-38

  Raj, Amit ^a   Prabhakar, T V ^b   Hendryx, Stan ^c  

^a Unisys India Pvt Ltd   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^c Hendryx and Associates Sunnyvale   (United States)

Author keywords

Business design; Business rules; Model driven architecture; Production rule representation; SBVR; UML

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS DESIGN; BUSINESS RULES; MODEL DRIVEN ARCHITECTURE; PRODUCTION RULE REPRESENTATION; SBVR; UML;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MARKUP LANGUAGES; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DESIGN;

EID: 56649095538     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1342211.1342221     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Business motivation model. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/dtc/06-08-03.pdf.
2. Digital business ecosystem project, "an internet based software environment in which business applications can be developed and used". Project. URL: http://www.digital-ecosystem.org/.
3. Open philosophies of associative autopoietic digital ecosystems (opaals). Network of Excellence, funded by the European Union's 6th Framework Programme of research.
4. Meta object facility specification, 2002. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/ formal/02-04-03.pdf.
5. Model driven architecture specification. Specification, Object Management Group, 2003. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf.
6. Object constraint language specification, 2003. URL: http://www.omg.org/ docs/ptc/03-10-14.pdf.
7. Executable uml specification. Object Management Group, May 2004.
8. Unified modeling language specification. Specification, Object Management Group, 2004. URL: http://doc.omg.org/ptc/2004-10-05.
9. Production rules representation. Specification, Object Management Group, 2005. URL: http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/slides/paulvincent.pdf.
10. Semantics of business vocabulary and rules specification. Object Management Group, March 2006.
11. F. Bry and P. lavinia Patranjan. Use cases for reactivity on web: Using eca rules for business process modeling. Report, INSTITUT FUR INFORMATIK der Ludwig-Maximilian-Universitat Munchen, 2006. URL: http://www.pms.ifi.lmu.de/ publikationen/diplomar-beiten/Inna.Romanenko/DA-Inna. Romanenko.pdf.
12. M. Dumas and A. H. M. Uml activity diagrams as a workflow specification language. In Fourth International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML 2001), pages 76-90, Toronto, Canada, 2001.
13. H.-E. Eriksson and M. Penker. Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.
14. C. L. Forgy. Rete: a fast algorithm for the many pattern/many object pattern match problem. Expert systems: a software methodology for modern applications, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pages 324-341, 1991.
15. A. Gupta and A. Raj. Strengthening method contracts for objects. In 13th Asia, Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pages 233-242, Bangalore, India, December 2006.
16. M. H. Linehan. Semantics in model-driven business design. Models/UML Conference, 2001.
17. D. T. Maurizio and C. Pierpaolo. Sbeaver business modeler editor. URL: http://sbeaver.sourceforge.net/.
18. M. Schacher. Moving from zachman row 2 to zachman row 3. Business Rules Journal, 7(6), June 2006.
19. P. Selonen, K. Koskimies, and M. Sakkinen. Transformation between uml diagrams. Journal of Database Management, 14(3):37-55, 2003.
20. D. Sorensen, A. Pastiak, A. Mitra, and A. Gupta. Integrating ontology into sbvr. Report 1033, Eller College of Management, 2006. URL: http://www.knowgravity.com/pdf-e/CASSANDRA-xUML-E.pdf.
21. J. Whittle and J. Schumann. Generating statechart designs from scenarios. International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 314-323, 2000.