Transformations between UML diagrams

Journal of Database Management

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 37-55

  Selonen, Petri ^a   Koskimies, Kai ^a   Sakkinen, Markku ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Diagram transformation; Model synthesis; Model transformation; UML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA STRUCTURES; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DIAGRAM TRANSFORMATION; MODEL SYNTHESIS; MODEL TRANSFORMATION; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0346910440     PISSN: 10638016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.2003070103     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Airaksinen J., Koskimies K., Koskinen J., Peltonen J., Selonen P., Siikarla M., & Systä T. (2002). xUMLi: Towards a Tool-independent UML Processing Platform. In: K. Østerbye (Ed.), Proceedings of NWPER 2002, Copenhagen, Denmark: IT University of Copenhagen.
2. Bodeveix, J.-P., Millan, T., Percebois, C., Le Camus, C., Bazex, P., & Feraud, L. (2002). Extending OCL for verifying UML models consistency. In L. Kuzniarz, G. Reggio, J.L. Sourrouille, & Z. Huzar (Eds.), ≪UML≫ 2002 Workshop on Consistency Problems in UML-based Software Development. (Research Report 2002:06) (pp. 75-90). Ronneby, Sweden: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
3. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Dósa Rácz, F. & Koskimies, K. (1999). Tool-supported compression of UML class diagrams. In R. France, & B. Rumpe (Eds.), Proceedings of ≪UML≫ '99, Fort Collins, CO, October (pp. 172-187). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
5. D'Souza, D.F. & Wills, A.C. (1999). Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Egyed, A. (1999). Integrating Architectural Views in UML. (Technical Report USCCSE-99-514) Los Angeles, CA: Center for Software Engineering, University of Southern California.
7. Engels, G., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G., & Ehrig, H. (1997). A combined reference model- and view-based approach to system specification. International Journal of Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 7(4), 457-477.
8. Frank, H. & Eder, J. (1998). Integration of Statecharts. In Proceedings of CoopIS'98, New York City, NY, August (pp. 364-372). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns - Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Harel, D. & Kugler, H. (2000). Synthesizing state-based object systems from LSC specifications. In S. Yu & A. Paun (Eds.), Proceedings of CIAA 2000, London, Ontario, Canada, July (pp. 1-33). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
11. Henderson-Sellers, B. (2001). Some problems with the UML V1.3 metamodel. In Proceedings of HICSS-34 (CD-ROM), Decision Technologies for Management Track, Maui, HA, January, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The Unified Software Development Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Köhler, H., Nickel, U., Niere, J., & Zündorf, A. (2000). Integrating UML diagrams for production control systems. In: Proceedings of ICSE'00, Limerick, Ireland, June (pp. 241-251). New York: ACM Press.
14. Koskimies, K., Männistö, T., Systä, T., & Tuomi, J. (1998). Automated support for modeling of OO software. IEEE Software, 15(1), 87-94.
15. Koskinen, J., Peltonen, J., Selonen, P., Systä, T., & Koskimies, K. (2001a). Towards tool assisted UML development environments. In T. Gyimóthy (Ed.), Seventh Symposium on Programming Languages and Tools, SPLST'2001, Szeged, Hungary, June (pp. 1-15). Szeged, Hungary: University of Szeged.
16. Koskinen, J., Peltonen, J., Selonen, P., Systä, T., & Koskimies, K. (2001b). Model processing tools in UML. In Proceedings of ICSE 2001, Toronto, Canada, May (pp. 819-820). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
17. Leite, J. C. S. P. & Freeman, P. A. (1991). Requirements validation through viewpoint resolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17(12) 1253-1269.
18. Mäkinen, E. & Systä, T. (2001). MAS - An interactive synthesizer to support behavioral modeling. In: Proceedings of ICSE 2001, Toronto, Canada, May (pp. 15-24). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society
19. Nørmark, K. (1998). Synthesis of Program Outlines from Scenarios in DYNAMO. Available online at: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~normak/dynamo.html.
20. OMG The Object Management Group September The Unified Modeling Language Specification v1.4. Available online at: http://www.omg.org/uml.
21. Peltonen, J. (2000). Visual scripting for UML-based tools. In Proceedings of ICSSEA 2000, Paris, France, December (vol. 3). Paris, France: CNAM.
22. Peltonen, J. & Selonen, P. (2001). Processing UML models with visual scripts. In Proceedings of HCC'01, Stresa, Italy, September (pp. 264-271). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
23. Rational Software Corporation (2002, October). Rational Rose Product Family. Available online: http;//www.rational.com/products/rose.
24. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Reading, MA; Addison-Wesley.
25. Schönberger, S., Keller, R. K., & Khriss, I. (2001). Algorithmic support for model transformation in object-oriented software development. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 13(5), 351-383.
26. Selonen, P., Koskimies, K., & Sakkinen, M. (2001). How to make apples from oranges in UML. In Proceedings of HICSS-34 (CD-ROM), Decision Technologies for Management Track, Maui, HA, January. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
27. Selonen, P., Systä, T., & Koskimies, K. (2001). Generating structured implementation schemes from UML sequence diagrams. In L. Qiaoyun, R. Riehle, G. Pour, & B. Meyer (Eds.), Proceedings of TOOLS USA, Santa Barbara, California, USA, July-August (pp. 317-328). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
28. Seltveit, A. (1996). An approach to information systems modelling based on systematic complexity reduction. In Proceedings of HICSS-29, Volume 2: Decision Support and Knowledge-Based Systems, Maui, HA, January (pp. 251-260). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
29. Systä, T. (2000a). Static and Dynamic Reverse Engineering Techniques for Java Software Systems. Technical Report A-2000-4, Department of Computer and Information Sciences. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
30. Systä, T. (2000b). Incremental construction of dynamic models for object-oriented software systems. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming (JOOP), 13(5), 18-27.
31. Whittle, J. & Schumann, J. (2000). Generating statechart designs from scenarios. In Proceedings of ICSE'00, Limerick, Ireland, June (pp. 314-323). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.