Whither... the future for contact dermatitis? A report from the 2007 International Review of Current Problems in Contact Dermatitis

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 159, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1229-1231

  Alexandroff, A B ^a   Burova, E ^b  

^a LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b BEDFORD HOSPITAL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Coronary artery disease; Fragrance; Occupational disease; Sensitization

Indexed keywords

2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; 4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; 5 CHLORO 2 METHYL 4 ISOTHIAZOLIN 3 ONE; ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ALLERGEN; CHROMIC ACID; CINNAMALDEHYDE; CONTACT ALLERGEN; DISULFIRAM; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; GOLD; HAIR DYE; ISOEUGENOL; NICKEL; QUATERNIUM 15; STEROID;

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CORONARY STENT; ECZEMA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; IMMUNITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INCIDENCE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN DISEASE; SKIN SENSITIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; ECZEMA; HUMANS; LONDON; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TESTS;

EID: 56549115033     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08859.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Mirshahpanah P, Maibach HI. Relationship of patch test positivity in a general versus an eczema population. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 125 30.
2. Thomas CL, Statham BN, Chowdhury MMU et al. The frequency of nickel allergy in patch-tested female patients: age-stratified data from nine U.K. centres for 2004-2005. Br J Dermatol 2007 157 (Suppl. 1) 84 Abstract
3. Britton JE, Wilkinson SM, English JS et al. The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governance. Br J Dermatol 2003 148 : 259 64.
4. Everness KM, Gawkrodger DJ, Botham PA et al. The discrimination between nickel-sensitive and non-nickel-sensitive subjects by an in vitro lymphocyte transformation test. Br J Dermatol 1990 122 : 293 8.
5. White JM, McFadden JP, White IR. A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization? Br J Dermatol 2008 158 : 518 21.
6. Hillen U, Jappe U, Frosch PJ et al. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Br J Dermatol 2006 154 : 665 70.
7. Jensen CD, Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2006 55 : 30 5.
8. Athavale P, Shum KW, Chen Y et al. Occupational dermatitis related to chromium and cobalt: experience of dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) in the U.K. over an 11-year period (1993-2004). Br J Dermatol 2007 157 : 518 22.
9. Health and Safety Executive. Dermatitis and Other Skin Disorders. 2008. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/dermatitis/index.htm (last accessed 30 July 2008).
10. McFadden JP, White IR, Frosch PJ et al. Allergy to hair dye. BMJ 2007 334 : 220.
11. White JM, White IR. The role of self-tests in the diagnosis of hair dye allergy. Br J Dermatol 2007 157 : 847 8.
12. White JM, White IR, Glendinning A et al. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005. Br J Dermatol 2007 157 : 580 2.
13. Ekqvist S, Svedman C, Moller H et al. High frequency of contact allergy to gold in patients with endovascular coronary stents. Br J Dermatol 2007 157 : 730 8.
14. Buckley DA. Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2007 157 : 295 300.
15. Basketter DA. Skin sensitization: strategies for the assessment and management of risk. Br J Dermatol 2008 159 : 267 73.