Typicality and misinformation: Two sources of distortion

Psicologica

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 171-187

  Luna, Karlos ^a   Migueles, Malen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56549088623     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bower, G.H., Black, J.B., & Turner, T.T. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
2. Brewer, W.F., & Treyens, J.C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
3. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
4. Drivdahl, S.B., & Zaragoza, M.S. (2001). The role of perceptual elaboration and individual differences in the creation of false memories for suggested events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 265-281.
5. Frost, P. (2000). The quality of false memory over time: Is memory for misinformation "remembered" or "known"? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 531-536.
6. Frost, P., Ingraham, M., & Wilson, B. (2002). Why misinformation is more likely to be recognised over time: A source monitoring account. Memory, 10, 179-185.
7. García-Bajos, E., & Migueles, M. (2003). False memories for script actions in a mugging account. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 195-208.
8. Gobbo, C. (2000). Assessing the effects of misinformation on children's recall: how and when makes the difference. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 163-182.
9. Greenberg, M.S., Westcott, D.R., & Bailey, S.E. (1998). When believing is seeing: The effect of scripts on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 685-694.
10. Hekkanen, S.T., & McEvoy, C. (2002). False memories and source-monitoring problems: Criterion differences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 73-85.
11. Higham, P.A. (1998). Believing details know to have been suggested. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 265-283.
12. Holst, V.F., & Pezdek, K. (1992). Scripts for typical crimes and their effects on memory for eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 573-587.
13. Lampinen, J.M., Copeland, S.M., & Neuschatz, J.S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1211-1222.
14. Lindsay, D.S. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1077-1083.
15. Lindsay, D.S., & Johnson, M.K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory and Cognition, 17, 349-358.
16. List, J.A. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Developmental Psychology, 22, 50-57.
17. Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
18. Luna, K., & Migueles, M. (2007). Acceptance of central and peripheral misinformation and confidence. Manuscript in preparation.
19. Migueles, M., & García-Bajos, E. (2004). ¡Esto es un atraco! Sesgos de la tipicidad en la memoria de testigos. Estudios de Psicología, 25,331-342.
20. Miller, M.B. and Gazzaniga, M.S. (1998). Creating false memories for visual scenes. Neuropsychologia, 36, 513-520.
21. Mitchell, K.J., & Zaragoza, M.S. (2001). Contextual overlap and eyewitness suggestibility. Memory and Cognition, 29, 616-626.
22. Nakamura, G.V., & Graesser, A.C. (1985). Memory for script-typical and script-atypical actions: A reaction time study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 384-386.
23. Nakamura, G.V., Graesser, A.C., Zimmerman, J.A., & Riha, J. (1985). Script processing in a natural situation. Memory and Cognition, 13, 140-144.
24. Nemeth, R.J., & Belli, R.F. (2006). The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation: False memory for typical and atypical items. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 563-573.
25. Neuschatz, J.S., Lampinen, J.M., Preston, E.L., Hawkins, E.R., & Toglia, M.P. (2002). The effect of memory schemata on memory and the phenomenological experience of naturalistic situations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 687-702.
26. Payne, D.G., Toglia, M.P., & Anastasi, J.S. (1994). Recognition performance level and the magnitude of the misinformation effect in eyewitness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 376-382.
27. Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (1997). The suggestibility of children's memory for being touched: Planting, erasing, and changing memories. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 95-106.
28. Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
29. Smith, V.L., & Studebaker, C.A. (1996). What do you expect?: The influence of people's prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 517-532.
30. Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
31. Sutherland, R., & Hayne, H. (2001). The effect of postevent information on adults' eyewitness reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 249-263.
32. Tuckey, M.R., & Brewer, N. (2003). How schemas affect eyewitness memory over repeated retrieval attempts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 785-800.
33. Vornik, L.A., Sharman, S.J., & Garry, M. (2003). The power of the spoken word: Sociolinguistic cues influence the misinformation effect. Memory, 11, 101-109.
34. Wright, D.B. (1993). Misinformation and warnings in eyewitness testimony: A new testing procedure to differentiate explanations. Memory, 1, 153-166.
35. Wright, D.B., & Stroud, J.N. (1998). Memory quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 273-286.
36. Zaragoza, M.S., & Lane, S.M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934-945.