The influence of schematic knowledge on contradictory versus additive misinformation: False memory for typical and atypical items

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 563-573

  Nemeth, Robert J ^a,b   Belli, Robert F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FALSE MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING TEST; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NARRATIVE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 33746142729     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1207     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Belli, R. F., & Loftus, E. F. (1996). The pliability of autobiographical memory: misinformation and the false memory problem. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 157-179). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., & McCarthy, T. T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory & Cognition, 22, 40-54.
3. Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
4. Erdfelder, E., & Bredenkamp, J. (1998). Recognition of script-typical versus script-atypical information: effects of cognitive elaboration. Memory & Cognition, 26, 922-938.
5. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
6. Frost, P. (2000). The quality of false memory over time: is memory for misinformation 'remembered' or 'known'? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 531-536.
7. Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. F. Ross, J D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 27-55). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Lindsay, D. S. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses'ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 1077-1083.
9. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
10. Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. E. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
11. Loftus, E. F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H. G., & Schooler, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held. Memory & Cognition, 17, 607-616.
12. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 19-31.
13. Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995-1009.
14. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
15. Roediger, H. L., III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365-371.
16. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-12.
17. Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cogntion, 20, 934-945.
18. Zaragoza, M. S., Belli, R. F., & Payment, K. E. (in press). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry, & H. Hayne (Eds.), Retrospection: Elizabeth Loftus's contributions to basic and applied problems in human memory. Erlbaum.