Genetic and plastic components of divergent male intersexual behavior in Misty lake/stream stickleback

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1217-1224

  Delcourt, Matthieu ^a,c   Räsänen, Katja ^a,b   Hendry, Andrew P ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive divergence; Courtship behavior; Mating traits; Natural selection; Plastic divergence; Reproductive isolation; Sexual selection; Three spined stickleback

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COURTSHIP; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); FISH; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATING BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS;

EID: 56449123591     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn084     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Albert YK. 2005. Mate choice, sexual imprinting, and speciation: a test of a one-allele isolating mechanism in sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution. 59:927-931.
2. Albert YK, Schluter D. 2004. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection. Evolution. 58:1099-1107.
3. Bell AM. 2005. Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Evol Biol. 18:464-473.
4. Bell MA, Foster SA. 1994. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Boughman JW. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature. 411:944-948.
6. Boughman JW, Rundle HD, Schluter D. 2005. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Evolution. 59:361-373.
7. Candolin U. 1997. Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 41:81-87.
8. Endler JA. 1992. Signals, signal conditions and the direction of evolution. Am Nat. 139:S125-S153.
9. Foster SA. 1994. Evolution of the reproductive behaviour of the threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA, editors. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 381-398.
10. Foster SA. 1995. Understanding the evolution of behaviour in threespine stickleback: the value of geographic variation. Behaviour. 132:1107-1129.
11. Foster SA, Baker JA. 1995. Evolutionary interplay between ecology, morphology and reproductive behaviour in threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Environ Biol Fishes. 44:213-223.
12. Hagen DW. 1967. Isolating mechanisms in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus). J Fish Res Board Can. 24:1637-1692.
13. Hatfield T, Schluter D. 1996. A test for sexual selection on hybrids of two sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution. 50:2429-2434.
14. Hay DE, McPhail JD. 2000. Courtship behaviour of male threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from old and new hybrid zones. Behaviour. 137:1047-1063.
15. Hendry AP, Taylor EB. 2004. How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution. 58:2319-2331.
16. Hendry AP, Taylor EB, McPhail JD. 2002. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution. 56:1199-1216.
17. Holland B, Rice WR. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution. 52:1-7.
18. Hurt CR, Stears-Ellis S, Hughes KA, Hedrick PW. 2004. Mating behaviour in the endangered Sonoran topminnow: speciation in action. Anim Behav. 67:343-351.
19. Ishikawa M, Mori S. 2000. Mating success and male courtship behaviours in three populations of the three spine stickleback. Behaviour. 137:1065-1080.
20. Ishikawa M, Mori S. 2006. Intraspecific differences in patterns of courtship behaviours between the Pacific Ocean and the Japan Sea form of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Fish Biol. 69:938-944.
21. Kraak SBM, Bakker TCM. 1998. Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs. Anim Behav. 56:859-866.
22. Lande R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 78:3721-3725.
23. Lavin PA, McPhail JD. 1993. Parapatric lake and stream sticklebacks on northern Vancouver Island disjunct distribution of parallel evolution. Can J Zool. 71:11-17.
24. Maan ME, Hofker KD, Alphen JJM, Seehausen O. 2006. Sensory drive in cichlid speciation. Am Nat. 167:947-954.
25. McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, Kingsley DL, Jamieson DM, Chou JL, Schluter D. 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature. 429:294-298.
26. McKinnon JS, Rundle HD. 2002. Speciation in nature: the three spine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:480-488.
27. McPhail JD, Hay DE. 1983. Differences in male courtship in freshwater and marine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Can J Zool. 61:292-297.
28. Miller GL, Stratton GE, Miller PR, Hebets E. 1998. Geographical variation in male courtship behaviour and sexual isolation in wolf spiders of the genus Schizocosa. Anim Behav. 56:937-951.
29. Moore J-S, Gow JL, Taylor EB, Hendry AP. 2007. Quantifying the constraining influence of gene flow on adaptive divergence in the lake-stream threespine stickleback system. Evolution. 61:2015-2026.
30. Moore J-S, Hendry AP. 2005. Both selection and gene flow are necessary to explain adaptive divergence: evidence from clinal variation in stream stickleback. Evol Ecol Res. 7:1-16.
31. Nagel L, Schluter D. 1998. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution. 52:209-218.
32. Olafsdottir GA, Ritchie MG, Snorrason SS. 2006. Positive assortative mating between recently described sympatric morphs of Icelandic sticklebacks. Biol Lett. 2:250-252.
33. Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature. 409:185-188.
34. Podos J, Hendry AP. 2006. The biomechanics of ecological speciation. In: Herrel A, Speck T, Rowe N, editors. Ecology and biomechanics: a mechanical approach to the ecology of animals and plants. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. p. 301-321.
35. Price TD. 2006. Phenotypic plasticity, sexual selection and the evolution of color patterns. J Exp Biol. 209:2368-2376.
36. Ridgway MS, McPhail JD. 1988. Raiding shoal size and a distraction display in male sticklebacks (Gasterosteus). Can J Zool. 66:201-205.
37. Rowland WJ. 1989. The ethological basis of mate choice in male sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav. 38:112-120.
38. Rowland WJ. 1994. Proximate determinants of stickleback behaviour: an evolutionary perspective. In: Bell MA, Foster SA, editors. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 297-344.
39. Rundle HD, Schluter D. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution. 52:200-208.
40. Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Schluter D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol. 16:372-380.
42. Schluter D, Price T. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 253:117-122.
43. Schwartz AK, Hendry AP. 2006. Sexual selection and the detection of ecological speciation. Evol Ecol Res. 8:399-413.
44. Scotti ML, Foster SA. 2007. Phenotypic plasticity and the ecotypic differentiation of aggressive behavior in threespine stickleback. Ethology. 113:190-198.
45. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:372-378.
46. Thompson CE, Taylor EB, McPhail JD. 1997. Parallel evolution of lake-stream pairs of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) inferred from mitochondrial DNA variation. Evolution. 51:1955-1965.
47. van Iersel JJA. 1953. An analysis of the parental behaviour of the male three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour. 3 (Suppl):1-159.
48. Vines TH, Schluter D. 2006. Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 273:911-916.
49. Wood CC, Foote CJ. 1996. Evidence for sympatric genetic divergence of anadromous and nonanadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhyncus nerka). Evolution. 50:1265-1279.