Modeling oral rat chronic toxicity

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1949-1954

  Mazzatorta, Paolo ^a   Estevez, Manuel Dominguez ^a   Coulet, Myriam ^a   Schilter, Benoit ^a  

^a NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; CHEMICAL DESCRIPTORS; EXPERIMENTAL VALUES; LEAVE-ONE-OUT CROSS VALIDATIONS; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE MODELING; ROOT MEAN SQUARED ERRORS; TOXICOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT;

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; FACTUAL DATABASE; FORECASTING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RAT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TOXICOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FORECASTING; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RATS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 56449087299     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci8001974     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kroes, R.; Galli, C.; Munro, I.; Schilter, B.; Tran, L.-A.; Walker, R.; Würtzen, G. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: A practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 255-312.
2. Cronin, M. T. D.; Walker, J. D.; Jaworska, J. S.; Comber, M. H. I.; Watts, C. D.; Worth, A. P. Use of QSARs in International Decision-Making Frameworks to Predict Ecologic Effects and Environmental Fate of Chemical Substances Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003; Vol. 111.
3. Walker, J. D.; Carlsen, L.; Hulzebos, E.; Simon-Hettich, B. Global government applications of analogues, SARs and QSARs to predict aquatic toxicity, chemical or physical properties, environmental fate parameters and health effects of organic chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2002, 13, 607-616.
4. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science: May 7, 2007; 532 pp.
5. Munro, I. C.; Ford, R. A.; Kennepohl, E.; Sprenger, J. G. Correlation of Structural Class with No-Observed-Effect Levels: A Proposal for Establishing a Threshold of Concern. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1996, 34, 829-867.
6. Mumtaz, M. M.; Knauf, L. A.; Reisman, D. J.; Peirano, W. B.; DeRosa, C. T.; Gombar, V. K.; Enslein, K.; Carter, J. R.; Blake, B. W.; Huque, K. I.; Ramanujam, V. M. S. Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed- adverse-effect level (LOAEL). Toxicol. Lett. 1995, 79, 131-143.
7. Venkatapathy, R.; Moudgal, C. J.; Bruce, R. M. Assessment of the Otal Rat Chronic Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level Model in TOPKAT, a QSAR Software Package for Toxicity Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1623-1629.
8. Final Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Cincinnati, OH, in fulfillment of Contract No. 68-C4-0006; HDi Inc.: Rochester, NY, 1995.
9. Ensle, K. In Advances in Molecular Toxicology; Reiss, C., Labbe, G., Parvez H., Eds.; VSP: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp 141-164.
10. Tilaoui, L.; Schilter, B.; Tran, L.-A.; Mazzatorta, P.; Grigorov, M. Intergrated Computational Methods for Prediction of Lo west Observable Adverse Effect Level of Food-Borne Molecules. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2007, 26, 102-108.
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ECOTOX User Guide: ECOTOXicology Database System. Version 4.0; 2006. www.epa.gov/ecotox/(accessed Dec 12, 2006).
12. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors; Mannhold, R., Kubinyi, H., Timmerman, H., Eds.; VCH: 2000.
13. DRAGON for Windows (Software for Molecular Descriptor Calculations), version 5.4-2006; Talete srl.
14. Leardi, R.; Lupiáñez, A. Genetic algorithms applied to feature selection in PLS regression: how and when to use them. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 41, 195-207.
15. Van de Voet, H. Comparing the predictive accuracy of models using a simple randomization test. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994, 25, 313-323.
16. Lipnick, R. L. Base-line toxicity predicted by qualitative structure-activity relationships as a probe for molecular mechanism of toxicity. In Probing Bioactive Mechanisms; Magee, P. S., Henry, D. R., Block, J. H., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1989; Vol. 413, pp 366-389.
17. Öberg, T. A QSAR for Baseline Toxicity: Validation, Domain of Application, and Prediction. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17, 1630-1637.
18. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
19. Martin, Y. C. A bioavailability score. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3164-3170.
20. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H. Y.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615-2623.
21. Yoshida, F.; Topliss, J. G. QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2575-2585.
22. Lu, J. J.; Crimin, K.; Goodwin, J. T.; Crivori, P.; Orrenius, C.; Xing, L.; Tandler, P. J.; Vidmar, T. J.; Amore, B. M.; Wilson, A. G. E.; Stouten, P. F. W.; Burton, P. S. Influence of molecular flexibility and polar surface area metrics on oral bioavailability in rat. J. Med Chem. 2004, 47, 6104-6107.
23. Kitagawa, S.; Li, H.; Sato, S. Skin permeation of parabens in excised guinea pig dorsal skin, its modification by penetration enhancers and their relationship with n-octanol/water partition coefficients. Chem. Pharm. Bull 1997, 45, 1354-57.
24. Potts, R. O.; Guy, R. H. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm. Res. 1992, 9, 663-69.
25. Siegel, I. A. Effect of chemical structure on nonelectrolyte penetration of oral mucosa. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1981, 76, 137-40.
26. Siegel, I. A. Permeability of the rat oral mucosa to organic solutes measured in vivo. Arch. Oral. Biol. 1984, 29, 13-16.
27. Dopp, E.; Hartmann, L. M.; Florea, A. M.; Rettenmeier, A. W.; Hinter, A. V. Environmental distribution, analysis, and toxicity of organometal(loid) compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2004, 34, 301-333.
28. Florea, A.-M.; Bilsselberg, D. Occurrence, use and potential toxic effects of metals and metal compounds. BioMetals 2006, 19, 419-427.
29. Costa, L. G. Current issues in organophosphate toxicology. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 366, 1-13.
30. Kroes, R.; Renwick, A. G.; Cheeseman, M.; Kleiner, J.; Mangelsdorf, I.; Piersma, A.; Schilter, B.; Schlatter, J.; van Schothorst, F. G.; Vos, J.; Wtlrtzen, G. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2004, 42, 65-83.
31. Hansch, C.; Steinmetz, W. E.; Leo, A. J.; Mekapati, S. B.; Kurup, A.; Hoekman, D. On the Role of Polarizability in Chemical-Biological Interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 120-125.
32. Verma, R. P.; Hansch, C. A. comparison between two polarizability parameters in chemical-biological interactions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 2355-2372.
33. Hotelling, H. The generalization of Student's ratio. Ann. Math. Statist. 1931, 2, 360-378.
34. Eriksson, L.; Jaworska, J.; Worth, A.; Cronin, M. T. D.; McDowell, R. M.; Gramatica, P. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification and regression-based QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1351-1375.
35. Silverman, B. W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, U.S.A., 1986; 176 pp.
36. Jaworska, J.; Nikolova-Jeliazkova, N.; Aldenberg, T. QSAR Applicability Domain Estimation by Projection of the Training Set in Descriptor Space: A Review. ATLA 2005, 33, 445-459.