Understanding applicant reactions to credit checks: Uncertainty, information effects and individual differences

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 307-320

  Kuhn, Kristine M ^a   Nielsen, Marsha L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56349167183     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00437.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alge, B.J., Ballinger, G.A., Tangirala, S. Oakley, J.L. (2006) Information Privacy in Organizations: Empowering creativity and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 221 232.
2. Anderson, N. (2004) Editorial - The Dark Side of the Moon: Applicant perspectives, negative psychological effects (NPEs), and candidate decision making in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 1 8.
3. Anderson, N. Goltsi, V. (2006) Negative Psychological Effects of Selection Methods: Construct formulation and an empirical investigation into an assessment center. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 236 255.
4. Arnoldy, B. (2007). The Spread of the Credit Check as Civil Rights Issue, Christian Science Monitor, January 18, 2007.
5. Arvey, R.D. Sackett, P.R. (1993) Fairness in Selection: Current developments and perspectives. In : Schmitt, N. Borman, W. (eds), Personnel Selection. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, pp. 171 202.
6. Avery, R.B., Calem, P.S. Canner, G.B. (2004). Credit Accuracy and Access to Credit. Federal Reserve Bulletin, Summer 2004.
7. Babcock, P. (2003) Spotting Lies. HRMagazine, 48, 46 52.
8. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Sanchez, R.J., Craig, J.M., Ferrara, P. Campion, M.A. (2001) Applicant Reactions to Selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387 419.
9. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Tucker, J.S., Weathers, V., Bertolino, M., Erdogan, B. Campion, M.A. (2006) Selection in the Information Age: The impact of privacy concerns and computer experience on applicant reactions. Journal of Management, 32, 501 621.
10. Berry, C.M., Sackett, P.R. Wiemann, S. (2007) A Review of Recent Developments in Integrity Test Research. Personnel Psychology, 60, 271 301.
11. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G. Fairchild, G. (2001) When do Elements of Procedural Fairness Make a Difference? A Classification of Moderating Influences. In : Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 179 212). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
12. Burns, G.N., Siers, B.P. Christiansen, N.D. (2008) Effects of Providing Pre-Test Information and Preparation Materials on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 73 77.
13. Bushnell, D. (2004). Firms' Use of Credit Checks Grows, Boston Globe, May 2, 2004, p. G1.
14. Cadrain, D. (2004) HR Professionals Stymied by Vanishing Job References. HRMagazine, 49, 31 32.
15. Cassady, A. Mierzwinski, B. (2004) Mistakes Do Happen: A look at credit report errors. Washington, D. C. : National Association of State PIRGs.
16. Chan, D. Schmitt, N. (2004) An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9 23.
17. Conkey, C. (2005). Increasingly, Employers, Others Check Your Ranking: Do you really need that store card? Wall Street Journal, November 19: B1.
18. Consumer Federation of America 2007). Consumer understanding of credit scores remains poor. on (accessed 30 July 2007).
19. Cummins, H.J. (2004). Want a Job? Get Ready for a Credit Check. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, October 3, 2004, 1A
20. Der Hovavanesian, M., Palmeri, C., Byrnes, N. Silver-Greenberg, J. (2008). Over the Limit. BusinessWeek, February 18, 2008.
21. Eddy, E., Stone-Romero, E.F. Stone, D.L. (1999) Effects of Information Management Policies on Reactions to Human Resource Information Systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52, 335 358.
22. EEOC 2007). Equal Employment Opportunity Commission meeting of May 16, 2007. Transcript. (accessed 15 June 2008).
23. Federal Trade Commission 2007). Credit-Based Insurance Scores: Impacts on consumers of automobile insurance.
24. Flahardy, C. (2005). Applicants Cry Foul Over Employment Credit Checks. InsideCounsel, January 2005.
25. Gallagher, K. (2006) Rethinking the Fair Credit Reporting Act: When requesting credit reports for 'employment purposes' goes too far. Iowa Law Review, 91, 1593.
26. Gilliland, S.W. (1993) The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694 734.
27. Gilliland, S.W. (1994) Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 691 701.
28. Gilliland, S.W., Groth, M., Baker, R.C., Dew, A.F., Polly, L.M. Langdon, J.C. (2001) Improving Applicants' Reactions to Rejection Letters: An application of fairness theory. Personnel Psychology, 54, 669 703.
29. Harris, M.M., Van Hoye, G. Lievens, F. (2003) Privacy and Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Selection Systems: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 230 236.
30. Hausknecht, J.P., Day, D.V. Thomas, S.C. (2004) Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639 683.
31. Hawkins, A. (2006). Refusal to Comply with Background Check Grounds for Firing. The Legal Intelligencer, January 25, 2006
32. Highhouse, S., Lievens, F. Sinar, E.F. (2003) Measuring Attraction to Organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986 1001.
33. Hollinger, R.C. Adams, A. (2007) 2006 National Retail Security Survey Final Report. Gainesville, FL : University of Florida.
34. Holtz, B.C., Ployhart, R.E. Dominguez, A. (2005) Testing the Rules of Justice: The effects of frame-of-reference and pre-test validity information on personality test responses and test perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 75 86.
35. Horvath, M., Ryan, A.M. Stierwalt, S. (2000) Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability and Self-Efficacy: What influences test-taker perceptions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 310 330.
36. Konig, C.J., Melchers, K.G., Kleinman, M., Richter, G.M. Klehe, U. (2007) Candidates' Ability to Identify Criteria in Nontransparent Selection Procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 283 292.
37. Kroll 2007). 2006 Background screening hit ratio report.
38. Lewis, D. (2006) Qualification: Must have a clean credit history. The Boston Globe, September 5, 2006.
39. Lievens, F., De Corte, W. Brysse, K. (2003) Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 67 77.
40. Murphy, K.R. Tam, A.P. (2004) The Decisions Job Applicants Must Make: Insights from a Bayesian perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 66 73.
41. Nielsen, M.L. Kuhn, K.M. (in press) Late Payments and Leery Applicants: Credit checks as a selection test. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal.
42. Oppler, E.S., Lyons, B.D., Ricks, D.A. Oppler, S.H. (2004) The Relationship Between Financial History and Counterproductive Work Behavior. Chicago : Presented at Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
43. Palmer, J.K. Koppes, L.L. (2004) Investigation of Credit History Validity at Predicting Performance and Turnover. Chicago : Presented at Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
44. Pennington-Cross, A. (2003) Credit History and the Performance of Prime and Non-Prime Mortgages. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 27, 279 301.
45. Ployhart, R.E., Ryan, A.M. Bennett, M. (1999) Explanations for Selection Decisions: Applicants' reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 87 106.
46. Reeve, C.L. Schultz, L. (2004) Job-Seeker Reactions to Selection Process Information in Job Ads. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 343 355.
47. Reid, L.D., Murphy, K.R. Reynolds, H.D. (1990) Drug Abuse and Drug Testing in the Workplace. In : Murphy, K.R. Saul, F.E. (eds), Psychology in Organizations: Integrating science and practice. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Rosse, J.G., Miller, J.L. Ringer, R.C. (1996) The Deterrent Value of Drug and Integrity Testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 477 485.
49. Ryan, A.M. Ployhart, R.E. (2000) Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565 606.
50. Sackett, P.R. Lievens, F. (2008) Personnel Selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 16.1 16.32.
51. Schwarz, A. (2007). Baseball and Umpires Clash Over Background Checks. New York Times, August 7, 2007.
52. Simon, S. (2005). Bad Credit Can Cost you a Job. Houston Chronicle, March 20, 1.
53. Smith, A. (2007). Unnecessary Credit Checks Challenged. HRMagazine, May 2007, p. 22.
54. Society for Human Resource Management (2004). SHRM Workplace Violence Survey Report. Alexandria, VA : Society for Human Resource Management.
55. Stone, E.F. Stone, D.L. (1990) Privacy in Organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, and protection strategies. In : Ferris, G.R. Rowland, K.M. (eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press, pp. 349 411.
56. Stone-Romero, E.F., Stone, D.L. Hyatt, D. (2003) Personnel Selection Procedures and Invasion of Privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 343 368.
57. Tepper, B.J. Braun, C.K. (1995) Does the Experience of Organizational Justice Mitigate the Invasion of Privacy Engendered by Random Drug Testing? An Experimental Investigation. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 211 225.
58. Truxillo, D.M., Bauer, T.N, Campion, M.A. Paronto, M.E. (2002) Selection Fairness Information and Applicant Reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1020 1031.
59. Truxillo, D.M., Steiner, D.D. Gilliland, S.W. (2004) The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining when selection fairness really matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39 53.
60. Tunick, B.E. (2003) Squeak E. Clean? Then go to Goldman. Investment Dealers' Digest, 69, 34 36.
61. Van den Bos, K. Lind, E.A. (2002) Uncertainty Management by Means of Fairness Judgments. In : Zanna, M.P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 34. San Diego : Academic Press, pp. 1 60.
62. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R. Wilke, H.A.M. (1997) Procedural and Distributive Justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95 104.
63. Visa USA (2007). Americans Unaware that Employers Can Legally Refuse to Hire Job Applicants with Low Credit Scores. Press release of September 13, 2007. Available