Reversing privatization, rebalancing government reform: Markets, deliberation and planning

Policy and Society

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 163-174

  Warner, Mildred E ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56349164733     PISSN: 14494035     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abers R. From Clientelism to cooperation: Local government, participatory policy, and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society 26 4 (1998) 511-537
2. Allmendinger P., Tewdwr-Jones M., and Morphet J. Public scrutiny, standards and the planning system: Assessing professional values within a modernized local government. Public Administration 81 4 (2003) 761-780
3. Bel, Germà, & Warner, M. E. (2008a). Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, in press.
4. Bel G., and Warner M.E. Challenging issues in local privatization. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 1 (2008) 104-109
5. Bollens S. Concentrated poverty and metropolitan equity strategies. Stanford Law and Policy Review 8 2 (1997) 11-23
6. Boyne G.A. The determinants of variations in local service contracting-garbage in, garbage out?. Urban Affairs Review 34 1 (1998) 150-163
7. Bozeman B. Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review 62 2 (2002) 145-161
8. Bresette, P., & Kinsey, M. (2006). Public structures: A constructive model for government. Public Briefing No. 6., A network for ideas and action, New York, NY: Dēmos. http://demos.org/talkaboutgov/toolkit/docs/publicStructures_es.pdf.
9. Briffault R. Localism and regionalism. Buffalo Law Review 48 1 (2000) 1-30
10. Brown T., Potoski M., and van Slyke D. Trust and contract completeness in the public sector. Local Government Studies 33 4 (2007) 607-623
11. Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). (2001). Dollars and Democracy: Canadians Pay the Price of Privatization Annual Report on Privatization, Ottawa, Canada: CUPE. http://www.cupe.ca/issues/privatization/arp/default.asp.
12. Clark, H. (2005). Patterson oration: Helen Clark - Full transcript May 6, 2004. Australian and New Zealand School of Government. ANZSOG, Carlton, Victoria Australia http://www.anzsog.edu.au/images/docs/news/Patterson_Oration.pdf.
13. Clavel P. The progressive city: Planning and participation, 1969-1984 (1986), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ
14. Coase R.H. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1960) 1-44
15. deLeon L., and Denhardt R.B. The political theory of reinvention. Public Administration Review 60 2 (2000) 89-97
16. Denhardt J.V., and Denhardt R.B. The new public service: Serving, not steering (2003), M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY
17. Denhardt R.B., and Denhardt J.V. The new public management: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review 60 6 (2000) 549-559
18. Entwistle T. Why are local authorities reluctant to externalise and do they have good reason?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23 2 (2005) 191-206
19. Entwistle T., and Martin S. From competition to collaboration in public service delivery: A new agenda for research. Public Administration 83 1 (2005) 233-242
20. Forester J. Planning in the public domain (1989), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
21. Forester J. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
22. Frug G.E. City making: Building communities without building walls (1999), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
23. Frug G.R. Beyond regional government. Harvard Law Review 117 7 (2002) 1766-1836
24. Gaventa J. Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities. In: Hickey S., and Mohan G. (Eds). Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? (2004), Zed Books, London
25. Gilbert A. The Latin American City (1998), Latin America Bureau, New York, NY
26. Goldsmith S., and Eggers W. Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector (2004), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
27. Graham C. Private markets for public goods (1998), The Brooking Institution Press, Washington, DC
28. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 34 2 (1985) 481-510
29. Hayes B. Follow the money. American Scientist 90 (2002) 400-405
30. Healey P. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23 2 (1996) 217-234
31. Healey P. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (1997), UBC Press, Vancouver
32. Hebdon R., and Jalette P. The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada - United States comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 1 (2008) 144-158
33. Hefetz A., and Warner M.E. Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 2 (2004) 171-190
34. Hefetz A., and Warner M.E. Beyond the market vs. planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in US cities. Local Government Studies 33 4 (2007) 555-572
35. Hipp M., and Warner M. Market forces for the unemployed? Training vouchers in Germany and the U.S. Social Policy and Administration 42 1 (2007) 77-101
36. Hirsch W.Z. Contracting out by urban governments-a review. Urban Affairs Review 30 3 (1995) 458-472
37. Hodge G.A. Privatization: An international review of performance (2000), Westview Press, Boulder, Colo
38. Holstrom N., and Smith R. The necessity of gangster capitalism: Primitive accumulation in Russia and China. Monthly Review (February 2000) 1-15
39. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, Spring, 3-19.
40. Innes J. Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (1995) 183-191
41. Kelly R.M. An inclusive democratic polity, representative bureaucracies, and the new public management. Public Administration Review 58 8 (1998) 201-208
42. Kodrzycki Y.K. Privatization of local public services: Lessons for New England. New England Economic Review (1994) 31-46
43. Kohl B. Privatization Bolivian style: A cautionary tale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 4 (2004) 893-908
44. Krumholz N., and Clavel P. Reinventing cities: Equity planners tell their stories (1994), Temple University Press, Philadelphia
45. Local Government New Zealand. The Local Government Act of 2002: An overview (2003), LGNZ, Wellington, NZ
46. Logan J.R., and Molotch H.L. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place (1987), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
47. Lowery D. Consumer overeignty and quasi-market failure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 2 (1998) 137-172
48. Lowery D. A transactions costs model of metropolitan governance: Allocation versus redistribution in urban America. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 1 (2000) 49-78
49. Martin S. The modernization of UK local government: Markets, managers monitors and mixed fortunes. Public Management Review 4 3 (2002) 291-307
50. McGuirk P.M. Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A 33 2 (2001) 195-217
51. Miraftab F. Neoliberalism and casualization of public sector services: The case of waste collection services in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 4 (2004) 874-892
52. Meyers M., and Jordan L. Choice and accommodation in parental child care decisions. Community Development: The Journal of the Community Development Society 37 2 (2006) 53-70
53. Moore M.H. Creating public value: Strategic management in government (1995), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MS
54. Nalbandian J. Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review 59 3 (1999) 187-197
55. Nalbandian J. Professionals and the conflicting forces of administrative modernization and civic engagement. American Review of Public Administration 35 4 (2005) 311-326
56. Nee V. The role of the state in making a market economy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 156 (2000) 64-68
57. North D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (1990), Cambridge Univ. Press, New York
58. Osborne D.E., and Gaebler T. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector (1992), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
59. Osborne D.E., and Plastrick P. Banishing bureaucracy (1997), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
60. Pack J.R. Privatization and cost reduction. Policy Sciences 11 2 (1989) 1-25
61. Polanyi K. The great transformation (1944), Beacon Press, Boston
62. Potapchuck W., Crocker J., and Schechter W. The transformative power of governance (1998), Program for Community Problem Solving, Washington, DC
63. Prager J. Contracting out government services: Lessons from the private sector. Public Administration Review 54 2 (1994) 176-184
64. Przeworski A. Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
65. Reardon K.M. Promoting community development through empowerment planning in East St. Louis, Illinois. In: Keating W.D., and Krumholz N. (Eds). America's poorest urban neighborhoods: Urban policy and planning (1999), Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oak, CA 124-139
66. Sager T. Positive theory of planning: The social choice approach. Environment and Planning A 33 4 (2001) 629-647
67. Sager T. Democratic planning and social choice dilemmas: Prelude to institutional planning theory (2002), Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire, England; Burlington, VT
68. Sager T. Deliberative planning and decision making: An impossibility result. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 4 (2002) 367-378
69. Salamon L. The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York pp. 1-47
70. Savas E.S. Privatization: The key to better government (1987), Chatham House Publishers, Chatham, NJ
71. Schamis H.E. Re-forming the state: The politics of privatization in Latin America and Europe (2002), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
72. Sclar E. You don't always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization (2000), Cornell University Press, Ithaca
73. Starr P. The limits of privatization (1987), Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC
74. Szymanski S. The Impact of compulsory competitive tendering on refuse collection services. Fiscal Studies 17 3 (1996) 1-19
75. Szymanski S., and Wilkins S. Cheap rubbish? Competitive tendering and contracting out in refuse collection. Fiscal Studies 14 3 (1993) 109-130
76. Tiebout C.M. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 5 (1956) 416-424
77. Troutt D.D. Ghettoes made easy: The metamarket/antimarket dichotomy and the legal challenges of inner-city economic development. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 35 2 (2000) 427-507
78. Warner M.E. Market-based governance and the challenge for rural governments: U.S. trends. Social Policy and Administration: An International Journal of Policy and Research 40 6 (2006) 612-631
79. Warner, M. E. (2006b). Inter-municipal cooperation in the U.S: A regional governance solution? Urban Public Economics Review/Revista de Economia Pública Urbana, 7, 132-151. http://government.cce.cornell.edu/doc/pdf/UPER6artWARNER.pdf.
80. Warner M.E., and Bel G. Competition or monopoly? Comparing US and Spanish privatization. Public Administration: An International Quarterly 86 3 (2008) 723-725
81. Warner M.E., and Daugherty C.W. Promoting the 'civic' in entrepreneurship: The case of rural Slovakia. Journal of the Community Development Society 35 1 (2004) 117-134
82. Warner M.E., and Hebdon R. Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 2 (2001) 315-336
83. Warner M.E., and Hefetz A. Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity and voice. Urban Affairs Review 38 1 (2002) 70-89
84. Warner M.E., and Hefetz A. Rural-urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 5 (2003) 703-718
85. Warner M.E., and Hefetz A. Pragmatism over politics: Alternative service delivery in local government, 1992-2002. The Municipal Yearbook 2004 (2004), International City County Management Association, Washington, DC pp. 8-16
86. Warner M.E., and Hefetz A. Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public/private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review 68 1 (2008) 150-161
87. Warner M.E., and Pratt J.E. Spatial diversity in local government revenue effort under decentralization: A neural network approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23 5 (2005) 657-677
88. Webster C.J. Public choice, Pigouvian and Coasian planning theory. Urban Studies 35 1 (1998) 53-75
89. Webster C.J., and Lai L.W.C. Property rights, planning and markets: Managing spontaneous cities (2003), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, MA