A heuristic personality-based bilateral multi-issue bargaining model in electronic commerce

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-35

  Nassiri Mofakham, Faria ^a   Nematbakhsh, Mohammad Ali ^a   Ghasem Aghaee, Nasser ^a   Baraani Dastjerdi, Ahmad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Conflict prevention; Decision making; E commerce; Five factor model of personality; Fuzzy inference; Intelligent agents; Multi criteria two person bargaining

Indexed keywords

AGENTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMERCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; FUZZY INFERENCE; HEURISTIC METHODS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STAGES;

CONFLICT PREVENTION; DECISION-MAKING; E-COMMERCE; FIVE-FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY; MULTI-CRITERIA TWO-PERSON BARGAINING;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 56349123019     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Acton, G.S., 2001. Five-Factor Model. URL 〈http://www.personalityresearch.org/bigfive.html〉, accessed December 06, 2005.
2. Allbeck, J., Badler, N., 2002. Toward representing agent behaviors modified by personality and emotion. Paper presented at Embodied Conversational Agents at AAMAS'02, July 15-19, Bologna, Italy.
3. André E., Rist T., Mulken S.V., and Klesen M. The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In: Cassell J., Sullivan J., Prevost S., and Churchill E. (Eds). Embodied Conversational Agents (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 220-255
4. Barber, K.S., Liu, T.H., Ramaswamy, S., 1998. Conflict management in sensible agent-based systems. Technical Report: The Laboratory for Intelligent Processes and Systems.
5. Barrett L.F., and Pietromonaco P.R. Accuracy of the five-factor model in predicting perceptions of daily social interactions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 23 11 (1997) 1173(15)
6. Bates J. The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM 37 7 (1994) 122-125
7. Block J. Millennial contrarianism: the five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality 35 (2001) 98-107
8. Borgotta E.F. The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science 12 (1964) 8-17
9. Costa Jr. P.T., and McCrae R.R. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality & Individual Differences 13 (1992) 653-665
10. Costa Jr. P.T., and McCrae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) (1992), Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL
11. Costa Jr. P.T., and McCrae R.R. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO inventory. Psychological Assessment 4 (1992) 5-13
12. Costa Jr. P.T., and McCrae R.R. Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 64 (1995) 21-50
13. Deschner D., Lang F., and Bodendorf F. Strategies for software agent based multiple issue negotiations. In: Bauknecht K., Madria S.K., and Pernul G. (Eds). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2001), LNCS 2115 (2001), Springer 206-215
14. Faratin P., Sierra C., and Jennings N.R. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International of Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24 3-4 (1998) 159-182
15. Fasli M. Agent Technology for e-Commerce (2007), Wiley, New York
16. Fatima S.S., Wooldridge M., and Jennings N.R. Bargaining with incomplete information. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 44 3 (2005) 207-232
17. Fiske D.W. Consistency of the factorial structures of personality rating from different sources. Abnormal and Social Psychology 44 (1949) 329-344
18. Gal, Y., Pfeffer, A., 2006. Predicting people's bidding behavior in negotiation. In: Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Hakodate, Japan, May 2006.
19. Gal, Y., Pfeffer, A., 2007. Modeling reciprocity in human bilateral negotiation. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2007, Vancouver, British Columbia.
20. Ghasem-Aghaee, N., Ören, T.I., 2004. Effects of cognitive complexity in agent simulation: basics. In: SCSC '04, pp. 15-19.
21. Gratch, J., Marsella, S., 2001. Modeling emotions in the mission rehearsal exercise. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, pp. 457-465.
22. Gratch J., and Marsella S. A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 5 4 (2004) 269-306
23. Gulley N., and Jang J.S.R. Fuzzy Logic Toolbox User's Guide (1995), The Math Works Inc
24. Heinström J. Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behaviour. Information Research 9 1 (2003). Paper 165. URL 〈http://InformationR.net/ir/9-1/paper165.html〉 accessed January 20, 2007
25. Howard P.J., and Howard J.M. The BIG FIVE Quickstart: An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model of Personality for Human Resource Professionals (2004), Center for Applied Cognitive Studies (CentACS), Charlotte, North Carolina. URL 〈http://www.centacs.com/quickstart.htm〉 accessed December 06, 2005
26. Hudlicka E. To feel or not to feel: the role of affect in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (2003) 1-2
27. Hudlicka E. Modeling effects of emotion and personality on political decision-making. In: Trappl R. (Ed). Programming for Peace: Computer-Aided Methods for International Conflict Resolution and Prevention, Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation Book Series (2) (2006), Springer, Netherlands 355-411
28. IBM Aglet Home Page, 2005. URL 〈http://www.trl.ibm.co.jp/aglets〉, accessed July 17, 2005.
29. Jennings N.R., Faratin P., Lomuscio A.R., Parsons S., Sierra C., and Wooldrige M. Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10 2 (2001) 199-215
30. Korothov D., and Hannah T.E. The five-factor model of personality: strengths and limitations in predicting health status, sick-role and illness behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences 36 (2004) 187-199
31. Kraus S. Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence 94 (1997) 79-97
32. Landers R.N., and Lounsbury J.W. An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior 22 2 (2006) 283-293
33. Lewicki R.J., Saunders D.M., and Barry B. Negotiation. fifth ed (2006), McGraw-Hill/Irwin
34. Liebert R.M., and Speigler M.D. Personality: Strategies and Issues. sixth ed (1990), Brooks/Cole Publishing Co
35. Lin R., Kraus S., Wilkenfeld J., and Barry J. Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Artificial Intelligence 172 6-7 (2008) 823-851
36. Martínez-Miranda J., and Aldea A. Emotions in human and artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 323-341
37. McAdams D.P. The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. Journal of Personality 60 (1992) 329-361
38. McCrae R.R., and Costa Jr. P.T. Updating Norman's "Adequate Taxonomy": intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 3 (1985) 710-721
39. McCrae R.R., and Costa Jr. P.T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1987) 81-90
40. McCrae R.R., and Costa Jr. P.T. A five-factor theory of personality. In: Pervin A., and John O.P. (Eds). Handbook of Personality (1999), Guilford, New York 139-153
41. Nash J.F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18 2 (1950) 155-162
42. Nassiri-Mofakham F., Nematbakhsh M.A., Ghasem-Aghaee N., and Baraani-Dastjerdi A. A simple semi-dynamic cooperative bargaining approach. Iranian Journal of Information Science and Technology 4 2 (2006) 15-38
43. Norman W.T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66 (1963) 574-583
44. Ören, T.I., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., 2003. Personality representation processable in fuzzy logic for human behavior simulation. In: SCSC '03, pp. 11-18.
45. Pfeffer, A., Gal, Y., 2007. On Reasoning Processes in Games National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Vancouver, British Columbia.
46. Reilly W.S., and Bates J. Building emotional agents. Technical Report CMU-CS-92-143: School of Computer Science (1992), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
47. Shedler J., and Westen D. Dimensions of personality pathology: an alternative to the five-factor model. American Journal of Psychiatry 161 (2004) 1743-1754
48. Sloman A. Prospects for AI as the general science of intelligence. In: Sloman A., Hogg D., Humphreys G., Partridge D., and Ramsay A. (Eds). Prospects for Artificial Intelligence (1993), IOS Press, Amsterdam 1-10
49. Smith G.M. Usefulness of peer ratings of personality in educational research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement 27 (1967) 967-984
50. Talman, S., 2004. The adaptive multi-personality agent. Master's Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
51. In: Weiss G. (Ed). Multiagent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
52. Zadeh L.A.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 (1965) 338-353
53. Zadeh, L.A.A., Fu, K.S., Tanaha, K., Shimura, M., 1975. Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Process. New York, London.