Modeling reciprocal behavior in human bilateral negotiation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 815-820

  Gal, Ya'akov ^a   Pfeffer, Avi ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AGENTS; MULTIPLE BILATERAL ROUNDS; PREDICTIVE POWER;

GAME THEORY; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 36348956129     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press, chapter 2.
2. Das, R.; Hanson, J. E.; Kephart, J. O.; and Tesauro, G. 2001. Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. In Nebel (2001).
3. Falk, A., and Fischbacher, U. 2006. A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behvior 54(2):293-315.
4. Gal, Y., and Pfeffer, A. 2006. Predicting people's bidding behavior in negotiation. In Stone, P., and Weiss, G., eds., Proc. 5th International Joint Conference on Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'06).
5. Gal, Y.; Pfeffer, A.; Marzo, F.; and Grosz, B. 2004. Learning social preferences in games. In Proc. 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'04).
6. Grosz, B.; Kraus, S.; Talman, S.; and Stossel, B. 2004. The influence of social dependencies on decision-making. Initial investigations with a new game. In Proc. 3rd International Joint Conference on Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS'04).
7. J.Nash. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155-162.
8. Koller, D., and Milch, B. 2001. Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. In Nebel (2001).
9. Kreps, D., and Wilson, R. 1982. Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory 27:253-279.
10. Littman, M., and Stone, P. 2005. A polynomial-time Nash equilibrium algorithm for repeated games. Decision Support Systems, repeated games, nash bargaining.
11. Nebel, B., ed. 2001. Proc. 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'01).
12. Pollack, M. 2006. Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI Magazine 26(9).
13. Rabin, M. 1993. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83:1281-1302.
14. Tesauro, G. 2002. Efficient search techniques for multi-attribute bilateral negotiation strategies. In Third International Symposium on Electronic Commerce.