Bone reaction to nano hydroxyapatite modified titanium implants placed in a gap-healing model

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 624-631

  Meirelles, Luiz ^a   Albrektsson, Tomas ^a   Kjellin, Per ^b   Arvidsson, Anna ^a   Franke Stenport, Victoria ^a   Andersson, Martin ^b   Currie, Fredrik ^b   Wennerberg, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone defect; Hydroxyapatite; In vivo test; Nanostructures; Nanotopography; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

APATITE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; BONE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; GALLIUM ALLOYS; HYDROXYAPATITE; HYDROXYLATION; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; PHOSPHATE MINERALS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACES; TITANIUM; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

AFM MEASUREMENTS; BONE APATITES; BONE DEFECT; BONE FILLINGS; BONE FORMATIONS; ELECTROPOLISHED; HIGHER RESOLUTIONS; HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS; IMPLANT STABILITIES; IN VIVO TEST; NANO ROUGHNESSES; NANO TOPOGRAPHIES; NANO-HA; NANOHYDROXYAPATITE; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OPTICAL INTERFEROMETERS; OPTIMAL ACTIVITIES; OPTIMAL PARAMETERS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SMOOTH SURFACES; SURFACE MODIFICATIONS; SURFACE PORES; SURFACE POROSITIES; SYNERGIC EFFECTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BIOMATERIAL; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM; NANOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BONE DEFECT; BONE PLATE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREW; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FRACTURE HEALING; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; INTERFEROMETER; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; POROSITY; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; HEALING; ANIMAL; BONE REMODELING; INTERFEROMETRY; MATERIALS TESTING;

ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; INTERFEROMETRY; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

EID: 56349089575     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31736     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
2. Clemens JA, Klein CP, Sakkers RJ, Dhert WJ, de Groot K, Rozing PM. Healing of gaps around calcium phosphate-coated implants in trabecular bone of the goat. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:55-64.
3. Clemens JA, Klein CP, Vriesde RC, Rozing PM, de Groot K. Healing of large (2 mm) gaps around calcium phosphate-coated bone implants: A study in goats with a follow-up of 6 months. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:341-349.
4. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Hjortdal VE, Juhl GI, Pedersen CM, Hvid I, Bunger C. Gap healing enhanced by hydroxyapatite coating in dogs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991:300-307.
5. Albee F, Morrison H. Studies in bone growth, triple calcium phosphate as a stimulus to osteogenesis. Ann Surg 1920;71: 32-37.
6. Hench LL. Bioceramics - From concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:1487-1510.
7. Jarcho M, Kay JF, Gumaer KI, Doremus RH, Drobeck HP. Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface. J Bioeng 1977;1:79-92.
8. Ducheyne P, Qiu Q. Bioactive ceramics: The effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. Biomaterials 1999;20:2287-2303.
9. Bloebaum RD, Beeks D, Dorr LD, Savory CG, DuPont JA, Hofmann AA. Complications with hydroxyapatite particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994:19-26.
10. Bloebaum RD, Zou L, Bachus KN, Shea KG, Hofmann AA, Dunn HK. Analysis of particles in acetabular components from patients with osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997: 109-118.
11. Morscher EW, Hefti A, Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:267-272.
12. Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. PhD thesis, Biomaterials Science/ Handicap Research. Göteborg: Göteborg University; 1996.
13. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces, Part 1: Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
14. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. Submitted for publication.
15. Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B. Microcirculation in grafted bone. A chamber technique for vital microscopy of rabbit bone transplants. Acta Orthop Scand 1978;49:1-7.
16. Piotrowski O, Madore C, Landolt D. The mechanism of electropolishing of titanium in methanol-sulfuric acid electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 1998;145:2362-2369.
17. Kjellin P, Andersson M; SE-0401524-4, assignee. Synthetic nano-sized crystalline calcium phosphate and method of production. Patent SE527610. 2006.
18. Stout K-J, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, Mainsah E, Luo N, Mathia T, Zahouani H. The development of methods for characterization of roughness in three dimensions. EUR 15178 EN of Commission of the European Communities, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 1993.
19. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Implant fixation improved by close fit. Cylindrical implant-bone interface studied in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59:272-275.
20. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Increased bone formation to nano rough unstable implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming.
21. Donath K. Preparation of histologic sections by cutting-grinding technique for hard tissue and other materials not suitable to be sectioned by routine methods. Exakt-Kulzer; 1993.
22. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-588.
23. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 1997;18:1573-1583.
24. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. New depths in cell behaviour: Reactions of cells to nanotopography. Biochem Soc Symp 1999; 65:15-26.
25. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997;276: 1425-1428.
26. Oakley C, Brunette DM. The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. J Cell Sci 1993;106(Pt 1):343-354.
27. Wojciak-Stothard B, Curtis A, Monaghan W, MacDonald K, Wilkinson C. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. Exp Cell Res 1996; 223:426-435.
28. Brunette DM. Fibroblasts on micromachined substrata orient hierarchically to grooves of different dimensions. Exp Cell Res 1986;164:11-26.
29. Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmen A, Ellingsen JE. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006;27:926-936.
30. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, Wennerberg A. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: An in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;57:485-496.
31. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A. An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials 2003;24: 701-710.
32. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-1227.
33. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:475-483.
34. Zhu XL, Eibl O, Berthold C, Scheideier L, Geis-Gerstrofer J. Structural characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and adhesion of pre-osteoblast cells. Nanotechnology 2006;17: 2711-2721.
35. de Oliveira PT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2004; 25:403-413.
36. Jager C, Welzel T, Meyer-Zaika W, Epple M. A solid-state NMR investigation of the structure of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. Magn Reson Chem 2006;44:573-580.
37. Zhu X, Eibl O, Scheideier L, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Characterization of nano hydroxyapatite/collagen surfaces and cellular behaviors. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:114-127.
38. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontal 2005;32:448-155.
39. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-392.
40. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:622-633.
41. Hayakawa T, Yoshinari M, Nemoto K, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Effect of surface roughness and calcium phosphate coating on the implant/bone response. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:296-304.
42. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. Aqueous mediated synthesis of bioresorbable nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. J Cryst Growth 2005;274:209-213.
43. Oonishi H, Hench LL, Wilson J, Sugihara F, Tsuji E, Kushitani S, Iwaki H. Comparative bone growth behavior in granules of bioceramic materials of various sizes. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;44:31-43.