Genetic diversity and relationships among Prunus cerasifera (cherry plum) clones

Botany

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1311-1318

  Horvath, Aniko ^a   Christmann, Hélène ^a   Laigret, Frédéric ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Chloroplastic DNA; Genetic resources; Genetic variability; Microsatellites; Prunus cerasifera Ehrh

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; CULTIVAR; DICOTYLEDON; DNA; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC RESOURCE; HORTICULTURE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; ROOTSTOCK; TAXONOMY;

PRUNUS; PRUNUS CERASIFERA; PRUNUS DOMESTICA;

EID: 56049095055     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B08-097     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Badenes, M.L., and Parfitt, D.E. 1985. Phylogenetic relationships of cultivated Prunus species from an analysis of chloroplast DNA variation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 1035-1041.
2. Bajashvili, E.I. 1991. Studies of some species of Prunus Mill. genus. Acta Hortic. 283: 31-34.
3. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N., and Bonhomme, F. 2004. Genetix 4.05.2, Logiciel sous Windows™ pour la Génétique des Populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
4. Beridze, R.K., and Kvatchadze, M.V. 1981. Origin and evaluation of cultivated plums of Georgia. Kulturpflanze, 29: 147-150. doi:10.1007/BF02014745.
5. Bernhard, R., and Claverie, J. 2005. La botanique des Prunus. Leur utilisation comme variétés et porte-greffe. In De la taille à la conduite des arbres fruitiers. Edited by J.-M. Lespinasse and E. Leterme. Editions du Rouergue, Rodez, France. pp. 296-299.
6. Bortiri, P.E., Oh, S.-H., Gao, F.-Y., and Potter, D. 2002. The phylogenetic utility of nucleotide sequences of sorbitol 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in Prunus (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89: 1697-1708. doi:10.3732/ajb.89.10.1697.
7. Cipriani, G., Lot, G., Huang, W.-G., Marrazzo, M.T., Peterlunger, E., and Testolin, R. 1999. AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]: isolation, characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 65-72. doi:10.1007/s001220051209.
8. Clegg, M.T., Gaut, B.S., Learn, G.H., and Morton, B.R. 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 6795-6801. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.15.6795. PMID:8041699.
9. Clement, M., Posada, D., and Crandall, K.A. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1660. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x. PMID:11050560.
10. Crane, M.B., and Lawrence, W.J. 1952. The genetics of garden plants. Macmillan, London, UK.
11. Demesure, B., Sodzi, N., and Petit, R.J. 1995. A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mithocondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol. Ecol. 4: 129-131. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 294X.1995.tb00201.x. PMID:7711952.
12. Dirlewanger, E., Cosson, P., Tavaud, M., Aranzana, M.J., Poizat, C., Zanetto, A., Arus, P., and Laigret, F. 2002. Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 127-138. doi:10.1007/s00122-002-0867-7. PMID:12582570.
13. Downey, S.L., and Iezzoni, A.F. 2000. Polymorphic DNA markers in Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 125: 76-80.
14. Dumolin-Lapegue, S., Pemonge, M.-H., and Petit, R.J. 1997. An enlarged set of concensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Mol. Ecol. 6: 393-397. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00193.x. PMID:9131816.
15. Eremin, V.G. 1978. Genetic potential of species Prunus cerasifera Ehrh., and its use in breeding. Acta Hortic. 74: 61-65.
16. Faust, M., and Suranyi, D. 1999. Origin and dissemination of plums. Hortic. Rev. 23: 179-231. Felsenstein, J. 2004. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
17. Hancock, J.F. 2003. Plant evolution and the origin of crop species. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Kovalev, N.V. 1939. Ecological differentiation of Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. DAN URSS, 23: 285-288.
19. Kovalev, N.V. 1941. Genus plum - Prunus Mill. In Flora URSS. Edited by AN URSS. Academia Scienterium URSS, Moscow & Leningrad, USSR. pp. 510-521.
20. Krussmann, G. 1986. Cultivated broad-leaved trees and shrubs. BT Batsford Ltd, London, UK.
21. Luneva, N.N. 1985. On the taxonomic position of Prunus caspica (Rosaceae) from the Eastern Zakavkazye. Bot. Zh. 70: 1487-1491.
22. Mnejja, M., Garcia-Mas, J., Howad, W., Badenes, M.L., and Arus, P. 2004. Simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers of Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) are highly polymorphic and transferable to peach and almond. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4: 163-166. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00603.x.
23. Mohanty, A., Martin, J.P., and Aguinagalde, I. 2000. Chloroplast DNA diversity within and among populations of the allotetraploid Prunus spinosa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 1304-1310. doi:10.1007/ s001220051439.
24. Mohanty, A., Martin, J.P., and Aguinagalde, I. 2002. Population genetic analysis of European Prunus spinosa (Rosaceae) using chloroplast DNA markers. Am. J. Bot. 89: 1223-1228. doi:10.3732/ajb.89.8.1223.
25. Mohanty, A., Martin, J.P., Gonzalez, L.M., and Aguinagalde, I. 2003. Association between chloroplast DNA and mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Prunus spinosa L. (Rosaceae) populations across Europe. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 92: 749-755. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg198. PMID:14534199.
26. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivised populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70: 3321-3323. doi:10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321. PMID:4519626.
27. Peakall, R., and Smouse, P.E. 2005. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (anu.edu.au/BoZo/GenAlEx).
28. Potter, D., Gao, F., Bortiri, P.E., Oh, S.-H., and Baggett, S. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 231: 77-89. doi:10.1007/s006060200012.
29. Ramsey, J., and Schemske, D.W. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 467-501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467.
30. Rehder, A. 1947. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. The Macmillan Company, New York, N.Y.
31. Rhoads, D.D., and Roufa, D.J. 1990. SEQAID II, Version 3.8. Molecular Genetics Laboratory. Center for Basic Cancer Research. Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kans.
32. Salesses, G. 1970. Etudes cytologiques chez les Prunus I. Espèces de la section Euprunus. Ann. Amélior. Plantes, 20: 469-483.
33. Schueler, S., Tusch, A., Schuster, M., and Ziegenhagen, B. 2003. Characterization of microsatellites in wild and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) - markers for individual identification and reproductive processes. Genome, 46: 95-102. doi:10.1139/g02-107. PMID:12669801.
34. Shaw, J., and Small, R.L. 2004. Addressing the "hardest puzzle in American pomology:" phylogeny of Prunus sect. Prunocerasus (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions. Am. J. Bot. 91: 985-996. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.6.985.
35. Smouse, P.E., and Peakall, R. 1999. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity, 82: 561-573. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180. PMID:10383677.
36. Struss, D., Ahmad, R., and Southwick, S.M. 2003. Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 128: 904-909.
37. Testolin, R., Marrazzo, T., Cipriani, G., Quarta, R., Verde, I., Dettori, M.T., Pancaldi, M., and Sansavini, S. 2000. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome, 43: 512-520. doi:10.1139/gen-43-3- 512. PMID:10902716.
38. Tounissoux, D. 2000. Wad: analyse des données, version 2.10.0. Université Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France.
39. Valiere, N. 2002. GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2: 377-379. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00228.x.
40. Waits, L.P., Luikart, G., and Taberlet, P. 2001. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol. Ecol. 10: 249-256. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x. PMID:11251803.
41. Wunsch, A., and Hormaza, J.L. 2002a. Cultivar identification and genetic fingerprinting of temperate fruit tree species using DNA markers. Euphytica, 125: 59-67. doi:10.1023/A:1015723805293.
42. Wünsch, A., and Hormaza, J.L. 2002b. Molecular characterisation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] SSR sequences. Heredity, 89: 56-63. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800101. PMID:12080370.
43. Xu, Y., Ma, R.-C., Xie, H., Liu, J.-T., and Cao, M.-Q. 2004. Development of SSR markers for the phylogenetic analysis of almond trees from China and the Mediterranean region. Genome, 47: 1091-1104. doi:10.1139/g04-058. PMID:15644967.
44. Zohary, D. 1992. Is the Europaean plum, Prunus domestica L., a P. cerasifera Ehrh. x P. spinosa L. allo-polyploid? Euphytica, 60: 75-77.
45. Zohary, D., and Hopf, M. 2000. Domestication of plants in the old world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.