Temporal and spatial scaling from individual trees to plantations: A modeling strategy

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 233-243

  Host, G E ^a   Isebrands, J G ^b   Theseira, G W ^a   Kiniry, J R ^c   Graham, R L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^b USFS Forest Science Laboratory   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

plantation; poplar; process modeling; scaling; Short rotation woody crops

Indexed keywords

CROPS; EROSION; FORESTRY; GROWTH KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; SOILS; WOOD;

FIBER PRODUCTION; HYBRID POPLAR; INDIVIDUAL TREES; SHORT ROTATION WOODY CROP PLANTATIONS; SOIL PRODUCTIVITY;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

POPULUS BEROLINENSIS;

EID: 0030483340     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00012-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. 1. R. L. Graham and M. Downing, Renewable biomass energy: understanding regional scale environmental impacts. First Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy, Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, pp. 1566-1581. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO (1993).
2. 2. R.L. Graham, An analysis of the potential land base for energy crops in the conterminous United States. Biomass and Bioenergy 6, 175-189 (1994).
3. 3. J. J. Landsberg, M. R. Kaufmann, D. Binkley, J. G. Isebrands and P. G. Jarvis, Evaluating progress toward closed forest models based on fluxes of carbon, water, and nutrients. Tree Phys. 9, 1-15 (1991).
4. 4. J. J. Landsberg, Physiological Ecology of Forest Production. Academic Press, London (1986).
5. 5. J. G. Isebrands, H. M. Rauscher, T. R. Crow and D. I. Dickmann, Whole-tree growth process models based on structural-functional relationships, in R. K. Dixon, R. S. Meldahl, G. A. Ruark and W. G. Warren (Eds), Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress, pp. 96-112. Timber Press, Portland, OR (1990).
6. 6. J. G. Isebrands and T. E. Burk, Ecophysiological growth process models of short rotation forest crops, in C. P. Mitchell, J. B. Ford-Robertson, T. Hinckley and L. Sennerby-Forsse (Eds), Ecophysiology of Short Rotation Forest Crops, pp. 231-266. Elsevier Applied Science, London (1992).
7. 7. J. F. Reynolds, D. W. Hubert and P. R. Kemp, Scaling ecophysiology from the plant the ecosystem: a conceptual framework, in J. R. Ehleringer and C. B. Field (Eds), Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe, pp. 127-140. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1993).
8. 8. F. A. Bazzaz, Scaling in biological systems: population and community perspectives, in J. R. Ehleringer and C. B. Field (Eds), Scaling Physiological Processes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1993).
9. 9. T. M. Smith, R. Leemans and H. H. Shugart, The Application of Patch Models of Vegetation Dynamics to Global Change Issues. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994).
10. 10. H. M. Rauscher, J. G. Isebrands, G. E. Host, R. E. Dickson, D. I. Dickmann, T. R. Crow and D. A. Michael, ECOPHYS: an ecophysiological growth process model of poplar. Tree Phys. 7, 255-281 (1990).
11. 11. J. R. Williams, C. Jones, A. J. R. Kiniry and D. A. Spanel, The EPIC crop growth model. Transactions of the ASAE 32, 497-511 (1989).
12. 12. R. Ceulemans, I. Impens and V. Steenackers, Variations in photosynthetic, anatomical, and enzymatic leaf traits and correlations with growth in recently selected Populus hybrids. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 273-283 (1987).
13. 13. G.E. Host, H. M. Rauscher, J. G. Isebrands and D. A. Michael, Validation of photosynthate production in ECOPHYS, an ecophysiological growth process model of Populus. Tree Phys. 7, 283-296 (1990).
14. 14. G. E. Host and J. G. Isebrands, An interregional validation of ECOPHYS, a growth process model of juvenile poplar clones. Tree Phys. 14, 933-945 (1994).
15. 15. C. O. Stockle and J. R. Kiniry, Variability in crop radiation-use efficiency associated with vapor-pressure deficit. Field Crops Research 25, 171-181 (1990).
16. 16. J. R. Williams, The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 329, 421-428 (1990).
17. 17. H. Vaisanen, H. Strandman and S. Kellomaki, A model for simulating the effects of changing climate on the functioning and structure of the boreal forest ecosystem: an approach based on object-oriented design. Tree Phys. 14, 1081-1095 (1994).
18. 18. R. A. Sequiera, P. J. Sharpe, N. D. Stone, K. M. El-Zik and M. E. Makela, Object-oriented simulation: plant growth and discrete organ to organ interactions. Ecol. Model. 58, 55-89 (1991).
19. 19. L. J. Folse, J. M. Packard and W. E. Grant, AI modeling of animal movement in heterogeneous habitat. Ecol. Model. 46, 57-72 (1989).
20. 20. J. G. Isebrands, N. D. Nelson, D. I. Dickmann and D. A. Michael, Yield physiology of short rotation intensively cultured poplars. North Central Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NC-91, pp. 77-93 (1983).
21. 21. J. G. Isebrands, Toward a physiological basis of intensive culture of poplar. Proc. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry, pp. 81-90. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA (1982).
22. 22. R. E. Dickson, Carbon and nitrogen allocation in trees. Ann. Sci. For. 46, 631-647 (1989).
23. 23. D. G. Sprugel, T. M. Hinckley and W. Schaap, The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22, 309-334 (1991).
24. 24. T. M. Hinckley and P. J. Schulte, Stems in the biology of the tissue, organism, stand, and ecosystem, in B. L. Gartner (Ed.), Plant Stems: Physiology and Functional Morphology, pp. 409-428. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1995).
25. 25. M. D. Coleman, J. G. Isebrands, R. E. Dickson and D. F. Karnosky, Photosynthetic productivity of aspen clones varying in sensitivity to tropospheric ozone. Tree Phys. 16, 585-592 (1995).
26. 26. A. L. Friend, M. D. Coleman and J. G. Isebrands, Carbon allocation to root and shoot systems of woody plants. Proc. First Int. Symp. on the Biology of Adventitious Root Formation, pp. 1-35 (1993).
27. 27. R. E. Dickson, Assimilate distribution and storage, in A. S. Raghavendra (Ed.), Physiology of Trees, pp. 51-85. Wiley, New York (1991).
28. 28. T. A. Villiers, Dormancy and the Survival of Plants. Edward Arnold, London (1975).
29. 29. T. T. Kozlowski, Growth and Development of Trees. Vol. I: Seed Germination, Ontogeny, and Shoot Growth. Academic Press, New York (1971).
30. 30. J. A. Romberger, Meristems, Growth and Development in Woody Plants. Technical Bulletin No. 1293, pp. 1-214, USDA Forest Service, Beltsville, MD (1963).
31. 31. F. T. Addicott, Abscission. University of California Press, Berkeley (1982).
32. 32. J. G. Isebrands and R. E. Dickson. Biology and silviculture of northern red oak in the North Central region: a synopsis. North Central Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NC-173, pp. 1-9 (1994).
33. 33. J. G. Isebrands, N. D. Nelson, D. I. Dickmann and D. A. Michael, Yield physiology of short rotation intensively cultured poplars. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. NC-91198377-93.
34. 34. J. G. Isebrands and N. D. Nelson, Crown architecture of short-rotation, intensively cultured Populus. II. Branch morphology and distribution of leaves within the crown of Populus 'Tristis' as related to biomass production. Can. J. For. Res. 12, 853-864 (1982).
35. 14C distribution. Tree Phys. 8, 109-119 (1991).
36. 36. K. S. Pregitzer, D. I. Dickmann, R. Hendrick and P. V. Nguyen, Whole-tree carbon and nitrogen partitioning in young hybrid poplars. Tree Phys. 7, 79-93 (1990).
37. 37. P. E. Heilman, G. Ekuan and D. B. Fogle, First-order root development from cuttings of Populus trichocarpa x P.deltoides hybrids. Tree Phys. 14, 911-920 (1994).
38. 38. J. H. Richards and P. R. Larson, Morphology and development of Populus deltoides branches in different environments. Bot. Gaz. 142, 382-393 (1981).
39. 39. R. E. Dickson, Carbon fixation and distribution in young Populus trees, in T. Fujimore and D. Whitehead (Eds), Crown and Canopy Structure in Relation to Productivity, pp. 409-426. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Ikaraka, Japan (1986).
40. 40. R. Ceulemans, R. F. Stettier, T. M. Hinckley, J. G. Isebrands and P. E. Heilman, Crown architecture of Populus clones as determined by branch orientation and branch characteristics. Tree Phys. 7, 157-167 (1990).
41. 41. T. M. Hinckley, R. Ceulemans, J. M. Dunlap, A. Figiola, P. E. Heilman, J. G. Isebrands, G. Scarascia-Mugnozza, P. J. Schulte, B. Smit, R. F. Stettier, E. Van Volkenburgh and B. Wiard, Physiological, morphological and anatomical components of hybrid vigor, in K. H. Kreeb, H. Richter and T. Hinckley (Eds), Populus. Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses, pp. 199-217. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague (1989).
42. 42. N. D. Nelson, T. E. Burk and J. G. Isebrands, Crown architecture of short-rotation, intensively cultured Populus, I. Effects of clone and spacing on first-order branch characteristics. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 73-81 (1995).
43. 43. T. E. Burk, N. D. Nelson and J. G. Isebrands, Crown architecture of short-rotation, intensively cultured Populus. III. A model of first-order branch architecture. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 1107-1116 (1995).
44. 44. P. W. Prusinkiewicz, C. G. Davidson and M. S. Hammel, Modeling the architecture of expanding Fraxinus pennsylvanica shoots using L-systems. Can. J. Bot. 72, 701-714 (1994).
45. 45. S. G. Chen, R. Ceulemans and I. Impens, A fractal-based Populus canopy structure model for the calculation of light interception. For. Ecol. Mgmt 69, 97-110 (1994).
46. 2, ozone and climate change on tree growth, in J. Hom, R. Birdsey and K. O'Brian (Eds), Proceedings 1995 Meeting of the Northern Global Change Program, pp. 33-37. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-214, Radnor, PA (1996).
47. 47. E. A. Hansen, Root length in young hybrid Populus plantations: its implication for border width of research plots. For. Sci. 27, 808-812 (1981).
48. 48. H. B. Granberg, A forest shading model using bitmapped graphics. Agric. For. Meteorol. 43, 225-234 (1988).
49. 49. J. Zavitkovski, Small plots with unplanted plot border can distort data in biomass production studies. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 9-12 (1981).
50. 50. J. Pastor and W. M. Post, Influence of climate, soil moisture and succession on forest carbon and nitrogen cycles. Biogeochem. 2, 3-27 (1986).
51. 51. A. D. Nicks, Stochastic generation of the occurrence, pattern, and location of maximum amount of daily rainfall, in Proc. Symp. on Statistical Hydrology, pp. 154-171, Tucson, AZ (1995).
52. 52. C. W. Richardson, Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Wat. Res. Res. 17, 182-190 (1981).